388 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18486202)
1. Adnexal masses: accuracy of detection and differentiation with multidetector computed tomography.
Tsili AC; Tsampoulas C; Charisiadi A; Kalef-Ezra J; Dousias V; Paraskevaidis E; Efremidis SC
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Jul; 110(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 18486202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative evaluation of multidetector CT and MR imaging in the differentiation of adnexal masses.
Tsili AC; Tsampoulas C; Argyropoulou M; Navrozoglou I; Alamanos Y; Paraskevaidis E; Efremidis SC
Eur Radiol; 2008 May; 18(5):1049-57. PubMed ID: 18193235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Characterization of adnexal masses using feature analysis at contrast-enhanced helical computed tomography.
Zhang J; Mironov S; Hricak H; Ishill NM; Moskowitz CS; Soslow RA; Chi DS
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2008; 32(4):533-40. PubMed ID: 18664838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Characterization of adnexal mass lesions on MR imaging.
Sohaib SA; Sahdev A; Van Trappen P; Jacobs IJ; Reznek RH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 May; 180(5):1297-304. PubMed ID: 12704041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multi-detector CT features of benign adnexal lesions.
Tsili AC; Dalkalitsis N; Paraskevaidis E; Tsampoulas K
Acad Radiol; 2010 Jan; 17(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 19734064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Performance of three-dimensional power Doppler angiography as third-step assessment in differential diagnosis of adnexal masses.
Utrilla-Layna J; Alcázar JL; Aubá M; Laparte C; Olartecoechea B; Errasti T; Juez L; Mínguez JÁ; Guerriero S; Jurado M
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 May; 45(5):613-7. PubMed ID: 25270368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnosis and Management of Adnexal Masses.
Biggs WS; Marks ST
Am Fam Physician; 2016 Apr; 93(8):676-81. PubMed ID: 27175840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Differentiation between malignant and benign ovarian tumors by magnetic resonance imaging.
Chen M; Wang WC; Zhou C; Zhou NN; Cai K; Yang ZH; Zhao WF; Li SY; Li GZ
Chin Med Sci J; 2006 Dec; 21(4):270-5. PubMed ID: 17249204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Asymptomatic adnexal masses: correlation of FDG PET and histopathologic findings.
Fenchel S; Grab D; Nuessle K; Kotzerke J; Rieber A; Kreienberg R; Brambs HJ; Reske SN
Radiology; 2002 Jun; 223(3):780-8. PubMed ID: 12034950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Computed tomography adnexal mass score to estimate risk for ovarian cancer.
Santoso JT; Robinson A; Suganda S; Praservit S; Wan JY; Ueland F
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Mar; 289(3):595-600. PubMed ID: 23995674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Magnetic resonance evaluation of adnexal masses.
Guerra A; Cunha TM; Félix A
Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):700-9. PubMed ID: 18568564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Doppler sonography of adnexal masses: the predictive value of the pulsatility index in benign and malignant disease.
Salem S; White LM; Lai J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov; 163(5):1147-50. PubMed ID: 7976891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Does sphere volume affect the performance of three-dimensional power Doppler virtual vascular sampling for predicting malignancy in vascularized solid or cystic-solid adnexal masses?
Kudla MJ; Alcázar JL
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 May; 35(5):602-8. PubMed ID: 20183808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Lesion size affects diagnostic performance of IOTA logistic regression models, IOTA simple rules and risk of malignancy index in discriminating between benign and malignant adnexal masses.
Di Legge A; Testa AC; Ameye L; Van Calster B; Lissoni AA; Leone FP; Savelli L; Franchi D; Czekierdowski A; Trio D; Van Holsbeke C; Ferrazzi E; Scambia G; Timmerman D; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Sep; 40(3):345-54. PubMed ID: 22611001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prospective external validation of the 'ovarian crescent sign' as a single ultrasound parameter to distinguish between benign and malignant adnexal pathology.
Van Holsbeke C; Van Belle V; Leone FP; Guerriero S; Paladini D; Melis GB; Greggi S; Fischerova D; De Jonge E; Neven P; Bourne T; Valentin L; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Jul; 36(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 20217895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prediction of benignity of solid adnexal masses.
Wang S; Johnson S
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Mar; 285(3):721-6. PubMed ID: 21858439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sonographic discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses in premenopause.
Radosa MP; Vorwergk J; Fitzgerald J; Kaehler C; Schneider U; Camara O; Runnebaum IB; Schleußner E
Ultraschall Med; 2014 Aug; 35(4):339-44. PubMed ID: 23775448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic performance of the Gynecology Imaging Reporting and Data System for malignant adnexal masses.
Zhang T; Li F; Liu J; Zhang S
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2017 Jun; 137(3):325-331. PubMed ID: 28295272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of morphology to characterize and manage common adnexal masses.
Valentin L
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Feb; 18(1):71-89. PubMed ID: 15123059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The role of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound in patients with adnexal masses.
Sohaib SA; Mills TD; Sahdev A; Webb JA; Vantrappen PO; Jacobs IJ; Reznek RH
Clin Radiol; 2005 Mar; 60(3):340-8. PubMed ID: 15710137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
