312 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18486750)
1. Intertester reliability and diagnostic validity of the cervical flexion-rotation test.
Hall TM; Robinson KW; Fujinawa O; Akasaka K; Pyne EA
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2008 May; 31(4):293-300. PubMed ID: 18486750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The diagnostic validity of the cervical flexion-rotation test in C1/2-related cervicogenic headache.
Ogince M; Hall T; Robinson K; Blackmore AM
Man Ther; 2007 Aug; 12(3):256-62. PubMed ID: 17112768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Long-term stability and minimal detectable change of the cervical flexion-rotation test.
Hall T; Briffa K; Hopper D; Robinson K
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2010 Apr; 40(4):225-9. PubMed ID: 20357415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of age, gender, lifestyle factors and sub-clinical neck pain on the cervical flexion-rotation test and cervical range of motion.
Smith K; Hall T; Robinson K
Man Ther; 2008 Dec; 13(6):552-9. PubMed ID: 17945529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The relationship between cervicogenic headache and impairment determined by the flexion-rotation test.
Hall TM; Briffa K; Hopper D; Robinson KW
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2010; 33(9):666-71. PubMed ID: 21109057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validity of eyeball estimation for range of motion during the cervical flexion rotation test compared to an ultrasound-based movement analysis system.
Schäfer A; Lüdtke K; Breuel F; Gerloff N; Knust M; Kollitsch C; Laukart A; Matej L; Müller A; Schöttker-Königer T; Hall T
Physiother Theory Pract; 2018 Aug; 34(8):622-628. PubMed ID: 29308957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reliability of manual examination and frequency of symptomatic cervical motion segment dysfunction in cervicogenic headache.
Hall T; Briffa K; Hopper D; Robinson K
Man Ther; 2010 Dec; 15(6):542-6. PubMed ID: 20609613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The flexion-rotation test and active cervical mobility--a comparative measurement study in cervicogenic headache.
Hall T; Robinson K
Man Ther; 2004 Nov; 9(4):197-202. PubMed ID: 15522644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Measuring passive cervical motion: a study of reliability.
Nilsson N
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1995 Jun; 18(5):293-7. PubMed ID: 7673795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is there a difference in the reliable measurement of temporomandibular disorder signs between experienced and inexperienced examiners?
Leher A; Graf K; PhoDuc JM; Rammelsberg P
J Orofac Pain; 2005; 19(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 15779540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The C0-C2 axial rotation test: normal values, intra- and inter-rater reliability and correlation with the flexion rotation test in normal subjects.
Satpute K; Nalband S; Hall T
J Man Manip Ther; 2019 May; 27(2):92-98. PubMed ID: 30935342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Normal kinematics of the upper cervical spine during the Flexion-Rotation Test - In vivo measurements using magnetic resonance imaging.
Takasaki H; Hall T; Oshiro S; Kaneko S; Ikemoto Y; Jull G
Man Ther; 2011 Apr; 16(2):167-71. PubMed ID: 21055995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Upper cervical range of motion is impaired in patients with temporomandibular disorders.
Grondin F; Hall T; Laurentjoye M; Ella B
Cranio; 2015 Apr; 33(2):91-9. PubMed ID: 25919749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reliability of the spin-T cervical goniometer in measuring cervical range of motion in an asymptomatic Indian population.
Agarwal S; Allison GT; Singer KP
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2005 Sep; 28(7):487-92. PubMed ID: 16182022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reliability and diagnostic accuracy of 5 physical examination tests and combination of tests for subacromial impingement.
Michener LA; Walsworth MK; Doukas WC; Murphy KP
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2009 Nov; 90(11):1898-903. PubMed ID: 19887215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reproducibility of cervical range of motion in patients with neck pain.
Hoving JL; Pool JJ; van Mameren H; Devillé WJ; Assendelft WJ; de Vet HC; de Winter AF; Koes BW; Bouter LM
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2005 Dec; 6():59. PubMed ID: 16351719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reliability of cervical range of motion using the OSI CA 6000 spine motion analyser on asymptomatic and symptomatic subjects.
Petersen CM; Johnson RD; Schuit D
Man Ther; 2000 May; 5(2):82-8. PubMed ID: 10903583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The interexaminer reproducibility of physical examination of the cervical spine.
Pool JJ; Hoving JL; de Vet HC; van Mameren H; Bouter LM
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2004 Feb; 27(2):84-90. PubMed ID: 14970808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of range of motion during the cervical flexion rotation versus the side-bending rotation test in individuals with and without hyperlaxity.
Swanson BT; Craven AB; Jordan J; Martin R
J Man Manip Ther; 2019 Feb; 27(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 30692840
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical tests of musculoskeletal dysfunction in the diagnosis of cervicogenic headache.
Zito G; Jull G; Story I
Man Ther; 2006 May; 11(2):118-29. PubMed ID: 16027027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
