These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18486804)

  • 1. Modification of a distraction device.
    Levine MH; Super S
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jun; 66(6):1307-8. PubMed ID: 18486804
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Re: Reconstruction of curved mandibular angle defects using a new internal transport distraction device: an experiment in goats.
    McLeod NM
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 47(3):247-8. PubMed ID: 19124180
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bone anchored intraoral device for transmandibular distraction.
    Mommaerts MY
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Feb; 39(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 11178849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mandibular midline distraction using a simple device.
    Uckan S; Guler N; Arman A; Mutlu N
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Jun; 101(6):711-7. PubMed ID: 16731388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intraoral mandibular distraction osteogenesis in a patient with severe micrognathia secondary to TMJ ankylosis using a tooth and bone-anchored device (PIT device): a case report.
    Douglas LR; Douglass JB; Smith PJ
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2000 Dec; 58(12):1429-33. PubMed ID: 11117696
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Unexpected breakage of mandibular midline distraction device: case report.
    Uckan S; Veziroglu F; Arman A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Dec; 102(6):e21-5. PubMed ID: 17138160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. New internal transport distraction device for reconstructing segmental defects of the mandible.
    Hibi H; Ueda M
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Oct; 44(5):382-5. PubMed ID: 16236405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Distraction osteogenesis for mandibular widening.
    Epker BN
    Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 1999 Mar; 7(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 11905330
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of distraction forces and frequency of distraction on bony regeneration.
    Kessler P; Neukam FW; Wiltfang J
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Oct; 43(5):392-8. PubMed ID: 16026911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of mandibular symphyseal distraction osteogenesis on mandibular structures.
    Malkoç S; Işeri H; Karaman AI; Mutlu N; Küçükkolbaşi H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):603-11. PubMed ID: 17110257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Distraction of the mandibular ramus in hemifacial microsomia with a defect of the glenoid fossa.
    Patterson AR; Brady G; Loukota RA
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Oct; 45(7):599-600. PubMed ID: 17328993
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A new distraction device to compare continuous and discontinuous bone distraction in mini-pigs: a preliminary report.
    Kessler P; Wiltfang J; Neukam FW
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2000 Feb; 28(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 10851667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of a new semiburied curvilinear distraction device in dogs.
    Niu XG; Han XX
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jan; 46(1):61-3. PubMed ID: 17646039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mandibular widening by distraction osteogenesis.
    Contasti G; Guerrero C; Rodriguez AM; Legan HL
    J Clin Orthod; 2001 Mar; 35(3):165-73. PubMed ID: 11314596
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The results of using a compression-distraction method for eliminating mandibular defects and deformities].
    Shamsudinov AG; Rabukhina NA; Bukatina NV
    Stomatologiia (Mosk); 2000; 79(4):40-3. PubMed ID: 10961111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modified LEAD System distractor to prevent tilting during alveolar distraction in the mandibular symphyseal region.
    García-García A; Peñarrocha-Diago M; Somoza-Martín M; Gándara-Vila P; Camacho F
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Mar; 46(2):141-3. PubMed ID: 17197057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical controversies in oral and maxillofacial surgery: Part two. External versus internal distraction osteogenesis for the management of severe maxillary hypoplasia: external distraction.
    Figueroa AA; Polley JW
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Dec; 66(12):2598-604. PubMed ID: 19022141
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biodegradable screw fixation in maxillofacial distraction osteogenesis.
    Yamauchi K; Mitsugi M; Takahashi T
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Sep; 65(9):1859-61. PubMed ID: 17719414
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Vector guidance splint for internal maxillary distraction.
    Cheung LK; Chua HD; Lo J; Luk HW
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Sep; 65(9):1852-6. PubMed ID: 17719412
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical controversies in oral and maxillofacial surgery: Part one. Maxillary distraction osteogenesis for advancement in cleft patients, internal devices.
    Drew SJ
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Dec; 66(12):2592-7. PubMed ID: 19022140
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.