These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1848681)

  • 1. Scientific misconduct. Back to the drawing board.
    Anderson C
    Nature; 1991 Mar; 350(6314):100. PubMed ID: 1848681
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The federal research misconduct regulations as viewed from the research universities.
    Wright DE
    Centen Rev; 1994; 38(2):249-72. PubMed ID: 11656759
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. NIH office plans research on misconduct.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 1999 Jul; 400(6740):99. PubMed ID: 10408427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Definitions and boundaries of research misconduct: perspectives from a federal government viewpoint.
    Price AR
    J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):286-97. PubMed ID: 11653365
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Salem comes to the National Institutes of Health: notes from inside the crucible of scientific integrity.
    Needleman HL
    Pediatrics; 1992 Dec; 90(6):977-81. PubMed ID: 1331947
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Scientific misconduct. Ill-defined, redefined.
    Palca J
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1996; 26(5):4. PubMed ID: 8891701
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What to do about scientific misconduct.
    Nature; 1994 May; 369(6478):261-2. PubMed ID: 8183349
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Study proposed on integrity of published data.
    Gavaghan H
    Nature; 1994 Oct; 371(6500):733. PubMed ID: 7935825
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Federal actions against plagiarism in research.
    Price AR
    J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):34-51. PubMed ID: 11653389
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Giving scientists their due. The Imanishi-Kari decision.
    Dresser R
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1997; 27(3):26-8. PubMed ID: 9219021
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Baltimore case--in brief.
    Hamilton DP
    Science; 1991 Jul; 253(5015):24-5. PubMed ID: 1648263
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. 'Misconduct' dispute raises fears of litigation.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 1997 Jan; 385(6612):105. PubMed ID: 8990102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Baylor backed over 'falsified data' claims.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 1997 Apr; 386(6627):747. PubMed ID: 9126718
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluating the oversight of scientific misconduct.
    Redman BK; Merz JF
    Account Res; 2005; 12(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 16634167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Policing fraud and deceit: the legal aspects of misconduct in scientific inquiry.
    Protti M
    J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 11653390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. "Thank God for the lawyers": some thoughts on the (mis)regulation of scientific misconduct.
    Reynolds GH
    Tenn Law Rev; 1999; 66(3):801-18. PubMed ID: 12625356
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. 'Fraud police' face dilemma over warning medical boards.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 1996 Feb; 379(6565):480. PubMed ID: 8596620
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. ORI and misconduct investigations.
    Bivens LW
    Science; 1994 Feb; 263(5147):593. PubMed ID: 8303258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Appeals board exonerates Baltimore, Imanishi-Kari.
    Marwick C
    JAMA; 1996 Jul 24-31; 276(4):266. PubMed ID: 8656524
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improving the scientific misconduct hearing process.
    Parrish DM
    JAMA; 1997 Apr 23-30; 277(16):1315-9. PubMed ID: 9109472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.