These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18486968)
21. [Criteria for evaluating the performance and utility of a diagnostic test]. Mancini J; Gaudart J; Giorgi R Med Trop (Mars); 2009 Feb; 69(1):78-82. PubMed ID: 19499742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Weighted 2 x 2 kappa coefficients: recommended indices of diagnostic accuracy for evidence-based practice. Gilchrist JM J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Oct; 62(10):1045-53. PubMed ID: 19278830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Performance and costs of a rapid syphilis test in an urban population at high risk for sexually transmitted infections. Gianino MM; Dal Conte I; Sciolè K; Galzerano M; Castelli L; Zerbi R; Arnaudo I; Di Perri G; Renga G J Prev Med Hyg; 2007 Dec; 48(4):118-22. PubMed ID: 18557305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Bayesian estimation of Tritrichomonas foetus diagnostic test sensitivity and specificity in range beef bulls. Perez A; Cobo E; Martínez A; Campero C; Späth E Vet Parasitol; 2006 Nov; 142(1-2):159-62. PubMed ID: 16876951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies accounting for disease prevalence: alternative parameterizations and model selection. Chu H; Nie L; Cole SR; Poole C Stat Med; 2009 Aug; 28(18):2384-99. PubMed ID: 19499551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Evaluation of the diagnostic value of plasma copper levels in cattle. Minatel L; Carfagnini JC Prev Vet Med; 2002 Feb; 53(1-2):1-5. PubMed ID: 11821132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Differential diagnostic test technology: sensitivity and specificity, an OIE validation perspective. Schmitt B Biologicals; 2005 Dec; 33(4):211-3. PubMed ID: 16289686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Evaluating the use of packed cell volume as an indicator of trypanosomal infections in cattle in eastern Zambia. Marcotty T; Simukoko H; Berkvens D; Vercruysse J; Praet N; Van den Bossche P Prev Vet Med; 2008 Nov; 87(3-4):288-300. PubMed ID: 18586340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Good interpretation of the results of a diagnostic test. Veziris N; Jarlier V Clin Infect Dis; 2003 Oct; 37(8):1143; author reply 1143-4. PubMed ID: 14523783 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Determinants of the accuracy of rapid diagnostic tests in malaria case management: evidence from low and moderate transmission settings in the East African highlands. Abeku TA; Kristan M; Jones C; Beard J; Mueller DH; Okia M; Rapuoda B; Greenwood B; Cox J Malar J; 2008 Oct; 7():202. PubMed ID: 18834523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A clinical, evidence-based approach to infectious causes of infertility in beef cattle. Givens MD Theriogenology; 2006 Aug; 66(3):648-54. PubMed ID: 16725187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Accuracy of diagnostic test interpretations. Atwell R Aust Vet J; 2012; 90(1-2):4. PubMed ID: 22256976 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Decision analysis: dealing with uncertainty in diagnostic testing. Smith RD; Slenning BD Prev Vet Med; 2000 May; 45(1-2):139-62. PubMed ID: 10802338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Evaluation of a training program for device operators in the Australian Government's Point of Care Testing in General Practice Trial: issues and implications for rural and remote practices. Shephard MD; Mazzachi BC; Watkinson L; Shephard AK; Laurence C; Gialamas A; Bubner T Rural Remote Health; 2009; 9(3):1189. PubMed ID: 19689171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Sample collection and handling: getting accurate results. Meinkoth JH; Allison RW Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract; 2007 Mar; 37(2):203-19, v. PubMed ID: 17336671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. Scales CD; Dahm P; Sultan S; Campbell-Scherer D; Devereaux PJ J Urol; 2008 Aug; 180(2):469-76. PubMed ID: 18550109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Using indirect ELISA to assess different antigens for the serodiagnosis of Fasciola gigantica infection in cattle, sheep and donkeys. Awad WS; Ibrahim AK; Salib FA Res Vet Sci; 2009 Jun; 86(3):466-71. PubMed ID: 18947842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of two methods of detecting purulent vaginal discharge in postpartum dairy cows and effect of intrauterine cephapirin on reproductive performance. Runciman DJ; Anderson GA; Malmo J Aust Vet J; 2009 Sep; 87(9):369-78. PubMed ID: 19703140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]