These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18488518)

  • 41. An official American Thoracic Society policy statement: pay-for-performance in pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine.
    Kahn JM; Scales DC; Au DH; Carson SS; Curtis JR; Dudley RA; Iwashyna TJ; Krishnan JA; Maurer JR; Mularski R; Popovich J; Rubenfeld GD; Sinuff T; Heffner JE;
    Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 2010 Apr; 181(7):752-61. PubMed ID: 20335385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Variable pay plans raise the bar on performance.
    Strateg Healthc Excell; 2000 Jun; 13(6):9-12. PubMed ID: 11183057
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Ontario's primary care reforms have transformed the local care landscape, but a plan is needed for ongoing improvement.
    Hutchison B; Glazier R
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2013 Apr; 32(4):695-703. PubMed ID: 23569049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The unintended consequences of New Zealand's primary health care reforms.
    Gauld R
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 2008 Feb; 33(1):93-115. PubMed ID: 18252858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Lessons from eleven primary health care nursing innovations in New Zealand.
    Nelson K; Wright T; Connor M; Buckley S; Cumming J
    Int Nurs Rev; 2009 Sep; 56(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 19702801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Sharing in the gains: employees design their own incentive compensation program.
    Lipson F; Van Heininger B
    Strateg Healthc Excell; 1999 Aug; 12(8):7-12. PubMed ID: 10539427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. GP and staff evaluation of the maturity matrix as a tool to assess and improve organisational development in primary care.
    Loegstrup L; Edwards A; Waldorff FB; Siersma VD; Buch MS; Eriksson T
    Int J Health Care Qual Assur; 2009; 22(7):686-700. PubMed ID: 19957823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Comparing the implementation consequences of the immunisation and emergency department health targets in New Zealand.
    Tenbensel T; Chalmers L; Willing E
    J Health Organ Manag; 2016 Sep; 30(6):1009-24. PubMed ID: 27681030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Chronic Care Management evolves towards Integrated Care in Counties Manukau, New Zealand.
    Rea H; Kenealy T; Wellingham J; Moffitt A; Sinclair G; McAuley S; Goodman M; Arcus K
    N Z Med J; 2007 Apr; 120(1252):U2489. PubMed ID: 17460739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Lessons from major initiatives to improve primary care in the United Kingdom.
    Doran T; Roland M
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2010 May; 29(5):1023-9. PubMed ID: 20439901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Change of heart. How a team of North Kirklees primary care trust clinicians used performance management principles to improve coronary heart disease services.
    Jackson S; Morgan G
    Int J Health Care Qual Assur; 2007; 20(1):61-76. PubMed ID: 18240509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Lessons from Albion: Can Australia learn from England's approach to primary healthcare funding?
    Norman R; Robinson S
    J Health Organ Manag; 2015; 29(7):925-32. PubMed ID: 26556159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Measuring and managing health system performance: An update from New Zealand.
    Chalmers LM; Ashton T; Tenbensel T
    Health Policy; 2017 Aug; 121(8):831-835. PubMed ID: 28610840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Understanding performance management in primary care.
    Rogan L; Boaden R
    Int J Health Care Qual Assur; 2017 Feb; 30(1):4-15. PubMed ID: 28105878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Valuing and rewarding employees in the changed health service.
    Wright V; Murlis H; Patterson D
    Health Serv Manage; 1991 Apr; 87(2):74-7. PubMed ID: 10110420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Possibilities and limitations of results-based management, pay-for-performance and the redesign of incentives. 2008 SESPAS Report].
    Peiró S; García-Altés A
    Gac Sanit; 2008 Apr; 22 Suppl 1():143-55. PubMed ID: 18405564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Swedish healthcare management practices and quality improvement work: development trends.
    Elg M; Stenberg J; Kammerlind P; Tullberg S; Olsson J
    Int J Health Care Qual Assur; 2011; 24(2):101-23. PubMed ID: 21456487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Using quality and cost for employee incentives in a reengineered hospital setting.
    Nash IS; Coughlin C; Caine CC
    Am J Med Qual; 1997; 12(2):130-4. PubMed ID: 9161060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Healthcare system performance improvement: a comparison of key policies in seven high-income countries.
    Gauld R; Burgers J; Dobrow M; Minhas R; Wendt C; Cohen AB; Luxford K
    J Health Organ Manag; 2014; 28(1):2-20. PubMed ID: 24783663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Assessing and developing community participation in primary health care in Aotearoa New Zealand: a national study.
    Neuwelt P; Crampton P; Crengle S; Dew K; Dowell A; Kearns R; Thomas DR
    N Z Med J; 2005 Jul; 118(1218):U1562. PubMed ID: 16027751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.