These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

287 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18488618)

  • 1. Multiple data sources improve DNA-based mark-recapture population estimates of grizzly bears.
    Boulanger J; Kendall KC; Stetz JB; Roon DA; Waits LP; Paetkau D
    Ecol Appl; 2008 Apr; 18(3):577-89. PubMed ID: 18488618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimating grizzly and black bear population abundance and trend in Banff National Park using noninvasive genetic sampling.
    Sawaya MA; Stetz JB; Clevenger AP; Gibeau ML; Kalinowski ST
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(5):e34777. PubMed ID: 22567089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using bear rub data and spatial capture-recapture models to estimate trend in a brown bear population.
    Kendall KC; Graves TA; Royle JA; Macleod AC; McKelvey KS; Boulanger J; Waller JS
    Sci Rep; 2019 Nov; 9(1):16804. PubMed ID: 31727927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hierarchical models for estimating density from DNA mark-recapture studies.
    Gardner B; Royle JA; Wegan MT
    Ecology; 2009 Apr; 90(4):1106-15. PubMed ID: 19449704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Grizzly Bear Noninvasive Genetic Tagging Surveys: Estimating the Magnitude of Missed Detections.
    Fisher JT; Heim N; Code S; Paczkowski J
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(9):e0161055. PubMed ID: 27603134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Comparison of Grizzly Bear Demographic Parameters Estimated from Non-Spatial and Spatial Open Population Capture-Recapture Models.
    Whittington J; Sawaya MA
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0134446. PubMed ID: 26230262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Demographic connectivity for ursid populations at wildlife crossing structures in Banff National Park.
    Sawaya MA; Clevenger AP; Kalinowski ST
    Conserv Biol; 2013 Aug; 27(4):721-30. PubMed ID: 23758532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating density-weighted connectivity of black bears (Ursus americanus) in Glacier National Park with spatial capture-recapture models.
    Carroll SL; Schmidt GM; Waller JS; Graves TA
    Mov Ecol; 2024 Jan; 12(1):8. PubMed ID: 38263096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sampling designs matching species biology produce accurate and affordable abundance indices.
    Harris G; Farley S; Russell GJ; Butler MJ; Selinger J
    PeerJ; 2013; 1():e227. PubMed ID: 24392290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A new method for estimating the size of small populations from genetic mark-recapture data.
    Miller CR; Joyce P; Waits LP
    Mol Ecol; 2005 Jun; 14(7):1991-2005. PubMed ID: 15910321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Precision and bias of spatial capture-recapture estimates: A multi-site, multi-year Utah black bear case study.
    Schmidt GM; Graves TA; Pederson JC; Carroll SL
    Ecol Appl; 2022 Jul; 32(5):e2618. PubMed ID: 35368131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An empirical exploration of data quality in DNA-based population inventories.
    Paetkau D
    Mol Ecol; 2003 Jun; 12(6):1375-87. PubMed ID: 12755868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluating noninvasive genetic sampling techniques to estimate large carnivore abundance.
    Mumma MA; Zieminski C; Fuller TK; Mahoney SP; Waits LP
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2015 Sep; 15(5):1133-44. PubMed ID: 25693632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using spatial mark-recapture for conservation monitoring of grizzly bear populations in Alberta.
    Boulanger J; Nielsen SE; Stenhouse GB
    Sci Rep; 2018 Mar; 8(1):5204. PubMed ID: 29581471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimating animal abundance at multiple scales by spatially explicit capture-recapture.
    Howe EJ; Potter D; Beauclerc KB; Jackson KE; Northrup JM
    Ecol Appl; 2022 Oct; 32(7):e2638. PubMed ID: 35441452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multiple estimates of effective population size for monitoring a long-lived vertebrate: an application to Yellowstone grizzly bears.
    Kamath PL; Haroldson MA; Luikart G; Paetkau D; Whitman C; van Manen FT
    Mol Ecol; 2015 Nov; 24(22):5507-21. PubMed ID: 26510936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Consequences of severe habitat fragmentation on density, genetics, and spatial capture-recapture analysis of a small bear population.
    Murphy SM; Augustine BC; Ulrey WA; Guthrie JM; Scheick BK; McCown JW; Cox JJ
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0181849. PubMed ID: 28738077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Compensatory heterogeneity in spatially explicit capture-recapture data.
    Efford MG; Mowat G
    Ecology; 2014 May; 95(5):1341-8. PubMed ID: 25000765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The smell of success: Reproductive success related to rub behavior in brown bears.
    Morehouse AT; Loosen AE; Graves TA; Boyce MS
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(3):e0247964. PubMed ID: 33657186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of sulfur and hair growth on stable isotope diet estimates for grizzly bears.
    Mowat G; Curtis PJ; Lafferty DJ
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0172194. PubMed ID: 28248995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.