These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
287 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18488618)
1. Multiple data sources improve DNA-based mark-recapture population estimates of grizzly bears. Boulanger J; Kendall KC; Stetz JB; Roon DA; Waits LP; Paetkau D Ecol Appl; 2008 Apr; 18(3):577-89. PubMed ID: 18488618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimating grizzly and black bear population abundance and trend in Banff National Park using noninvasive genetic sampling. Sawaya MA; Stetz JB; Clevenger AP; Gibeau ML; Kalinowski ST PLoS One; 2012; 7(5):e34777. PubMed ID: 22567089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Using bear rub data and spatial capture-recapture models to estimate trend in a brown bear population. Kendall KC; Graves TA; Royle JA; Macleod AC; McKelvey KS; Boulanger J; Waller JS Sci Rep; 2019 Nov; 9(1):16804. PubMed ID: 31727927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hierarchical models for estimating density from DNA mark-recapture studies. Gardner B; Royle JA; Wegan MT Ecology; 2009 Apr; 90(4):1106-15. PubMed ID: 19449704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Comparison of Grizzly Bear Demographic Parameters Estimated from Non-Spatial and Spatial Open Population Capture-Recapture Models. Whittington J; Sawaya MA PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0134446. PubMed ID: 26230262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Demographic connectivity for ursid populations at wildlife crossing structures in Banff National Park. Sawaya MA; Clevenger AP; Kalinowski ST Conserv Biol; 2013 Aug; 27(4):721-30. PubMed ID: 23758532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluating density-weighted connectivity of black bears (Ursus americanus) in Glacier National Park with spatial capture-recapture models. Carroll SL; Schmidt GM; Waller JS; Graves TA Mov Ecol; 2024 Jan; 12(1):8. PubMed ID: 38263096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sampling designs matching species biology produce accurate and affordable abundance indices. Harris G; Farley S; Russell GJ; Butler MJ; Selinger J PeerJ; 2013; 1():e227. PubMed ID: 24392290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A new method for estimating the size of small populations from genetic mark-recapture data. Miller CR; Joyce P; Waits LP Mol Ecol; 2005 Jun; 14(7):1991-2005. PubMed ID: 15910321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Precision and bias of spatial capture-recapture estimates: A multi-site, multi-year Utah black bear case study. Schmidt GM; Graves TA; Pederson JC; Carroll SL Ecol Appl; 2022 Jul; 32(5):e2618. PubMed ID: 35368131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An empirical exploration of data quality in DNA-based population inventories. Paetkau D Mol Ecol; 2003 Jun; 12(6):1375-87. PubMed ID: 12755868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The smell of success: Reproductive success related to rub behavior in brown bears. Morehouse AT; Loosen AE; Graves TA; Boyce MS PLoS One; 2021; 16(3):e0247964. PubMed ID: 33657186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The influence of sulfur and hair growth on stable isotope diet estimates for grizzly bears. Mowat G; Curtis PJ; Lafferty DJ PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0172194. PubMed ID: 28248995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]