These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18488618)

  • 21. Reliability of different mark-recapture methods for population size estimation tested against reference population sizes constructed from field data.
    Grimm A; Gruber B; Henle K
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(6):e98840. PubMed ID: 24896260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effects of social organization, trap arrangement and density, sampling scale, and population density on bias in population size estimation using some common mark-recapture estimators.
    Gupta M; Joshi A; Vidya TN
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0173609. PubMed ID: 28306735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Seasonal and individual variation in the use of rail-associated food attractants by grizzly bears (Ursus arctos) in a national park.
    Murray MH; Fassina S; Hopkins JB; Whittington J; St Clair CC
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0175658. PubMed ID: 28542218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Bias reduction for multiple-recapture estimators of closed population size.
    Evans MA; Bonett DG
    Biometrics; 1994 Jun; 50(2):388-95. PubMed ID: 8068839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluating and integrating spatial capture-recapture models with data of variable individual identifiability.
    Ruprecht JS; Eriksson CE; Forrester TD; Clark DA; Wisdom MJ; Rowland MM; Johnson BK; Levi T
    Ecol Appl; 2021 Oct; 31(7):e02405. PubMed ID: 34245619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Estimating population size with noninvasive capture-mark-recapture data.
    Petit E; Valiere N
    Conserv Biol; 2006 Aug; 20(4):1062-73. PubMed ID: 16922223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Integrating acoustic telemetry into mark-recapture models to improve the precision of apparent survival and abundance estimates.
    Dudgeon CL; Pollock KH; Braccini JM; Semmens JM; Barnett A
    Oecologia; 2015 Jul; 178(3):761-72. PubMed ID: 25740335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Reducing effects of dispersal on the bias of 2-sample mark-recapture estimators of stream fish abundance.
    McNair JN; Ruetz CR; Carlson A; Suh J
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0200733. PubMed ID: 30067773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cortisol levels in blood and hair of unanesthetized grizzly bears (Ursus arctos) following intravenous cosyntropin injection.
    Cattet M; Janz DM; Kapronczai L; Erlenbach JA; Jansen HT; Nelson OL; Robbins CT; Stenhouse GB
    Vet Med Sci; 2021 Sep; 7(5):2032-2038. PubMed ID: 33978314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Optimization of capture-recapture monitoring of elusive species illustrated with a threatened grasshopper.
    Bröder L; Tatin L; Hochkirch A; Schuld A; Pabst L; Besnard A
    Conserv Biol; 2020 Jun; 34(3):743-753. PubMed ID: 31825105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Trap configuration and spacing influences parameter estimates in spatial capture-recapture models.
    Sun CC; Fuller AK; Royle JA
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e88025. PubMed ID: 24505361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An empirical evaluation of camera trapping and spatially explicit capture-recapture models for estimating chimpanzee density.
    Després-Einspenner ML; Howe EJ; Drapeau P; Kühl HS
    Am J Primatol; 2017 Jul; 79(7):. PubMed ID: 28267880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Multiple observation processes in spatial capture-recapture models: How much do we gain?
    Tourani M; Dupont P; Nawaz MA; Bischof R
    Ecology; 2020 Jul; 101(7):e03030. PubMed ID: 32112415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparing capture-recapture methods for estimation of the size of small and medium-sized populations using empirical data on commercial turkey farms in Canada.
    El Allaki F; Christensen J; Vallières A
    Prev Vet Med; 2015 Jun; 120(1):86-95. PubMed ID: 25542525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Testing the precision and sensitivity of density estimates obtained with a camera-trap method revealed limitations and opportunities.
    Pettigrew P; Sigouin D; St-Laurent MH
    Ecol Evol; 2021 Jun; 11(12):7879-7889. PubMed ID: 34188858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. multimark: an R package for analysis of capture-recapture data consisting of multiple "noninvasive" marks.
    McClintock BT
    Ecol Evol; 2015 Nov; 5(21):4920-31. PubMed ID: 26640671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Modeling spatiotemporal abundance and movement dynamics using an integrated spatial capture-recapture movement model.
    Hostetter NJ; Regehr EV; Wilson RR; Royle JA; Converse SJ
    Ecology; 2022 Oct; 103(10):e3772. PubMed ID: 35633152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The Petersen-Lincoln estimator and its extension to estimate the size of a shared population.
    Chao A; Pan HY; Chiang SC
    Biom J; 2008 Dec; 50(6):957-70. PubMed ID: 19067330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Y-chromosomal testing of brown bears (Ursus arctos): Validation of a multiplex PCR-approach for nine STRs suitable for fecal and hair samples.
    Aarnes SG; Hagen SB; Andreassen R; Schregel J; Knappskog PM; Hailer F; Stenhouse G; Janke A; Eiken HG
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 Nov; 19():197-204. PubMed ID: 26264959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Explaining detection heterogeneity with finite mixture and non-Euclidean movement in spatially explicit capture-recapture models.
    Marrotte RR; Howe EJ; Beauclerc KB; Potter D; Northrup JM
    PeerJ; 2022; 10():e13490. PubMed ID: 35694380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.