These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18488641)

  • 1. Frequency interpretation of ambiguous statistical information facilitates Bayesian reasoning.
    Brase GL
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Apr; 15(2):284-9. PubMed ID: 18488641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Another chance for good reasoning.
    Pighin S; Tentori K; Girotto V
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Dec; 24(6):1995-2002. PubMed ID: 28265865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Now you Bayes, now you don't: effects of set-problem and frequency-format mental representations on statistical reasoning.
    Sirota M; Kostovičová L; Vallée-Tourangeau F
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Oct; 22(5):1465-73. PubMed ID: 25711182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Children's quantitative Bayesian inferences from natural frequencies and number of chances.
    Pighin S; Girotto V; Tentori K
    Cognition; 2017 Nov; 168():164-175. PubMed ID: 28692831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adding up to good Bayesian reasoning: Problem format manipulations and individual skill differences.
    Brase GL; Hill WT
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2017 Apr; 146(4):577-591. PubMed ID: 28383994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How to train your Bayesian: a problem-representation transfer rather than a format-representation shift explains training effects.
    Sirota M; Kostovičová L; Vallée-Tourangeau F
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 25283723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Boosting for insight and/or boosting for agency? How to maximize accurate test interpretation with natural frequencies.
    Feufel MA; Keller N; Kendel F; Spies CD
    BMC Med Educ; 2023 Feb; 23(1):75. PubMed ID: 36747214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Representation facilitates reasoning: what natural frequencies are and what they are not.
    Hoffrage U; Gigerenzer G; Krauss S; Martignon L
    Cognition; 2002 Jul; 84(3):343-52. PubMed ID: 12044739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measures of Bayesian Reasoning Performance on 'Normal' and 'Natural' Frequency Tasks.
    Stock R; Fisk JE; Montgomery C
    J Gen Psychol; 2016; 143(3):185-214. PubMed ID: 27410053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Structural mapping in statistical word problems: A relational reasoning approach to Bayesian inference.
    Johnson ED; Tubau E
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Jun; 24(3):964-971. PubMed ID: 27678378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Chances and frequencies in probabilistic reasoning: rejoinder to Hoffrage, Gigerenzer, Krauss, and Martignon.
    Girotto V; Gonzalez M
    Cognition; 2002 Jul; 84(3):353-9. PubMed ID: 12044740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What facilitates Bayesian reasoning? A crucial test of ecological rationality versus nested sets hypotheses.
    Brase G
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Apr; 28(2):703-709. PubMed ID: 32885405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Good fences make for good neighbors but bad science: a review of what improves Bayesian reasoning and why.
    Brase GL; Hill WT
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():340. PubMed ID: 25873904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Natural frequency trees improve diagnostic efficiency in Bayesian reasoning.
    Binder K; Krauss S; Schmidmaier R; Braun LT
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2021 Aug; 26(3):847-863. PubMed ID: 33599875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Meta-analysis of the effect of natural frequencies on Bayesian reasoning.
    McDowell M; Jacobs P
    Psychol Bull; 2017 Dec; 143(12):1273-1312. PubMed ID: 29048176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interactivity fosters Bayesian reasoning without instruction.
    Vallée-Tourangeau G; Abadie M; Vallée-Tourangeau F
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2015 Jun; 144(3):581-603. PubMed ID: 26030173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improving Diagnostic Efficiency with Frequency Double-Trees and Frequency Nets in Bayesian Reasoning.
    Kunzelmann AK; Binder K; Fischer MR; Reincke M; Braun LT; Schmidmaier R
    MDM Policy Pract; 2022; 7(1):23814683221086623. PubMed ID: 35321028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Asking better questions: How presentation formats influence information search.
    Wu CM; Meder B; Filimon F; Nelson JD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Aug; 43(8):1274-1297. PubMed ID: 28318286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Within-subject consistency and between-subject variability in Bayesian reasoning strategies.
    Cohen AL; Staub A
    Cogn Psychol; 2015 Sep; 81():26-47. PubMed ID: 26354671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Why Can Only 24% Solve Bayesian Reasoning Problems in Natural Frequencies: Frequency Phobia in Spite of Probability Blindness.
    Weber P; Binder K; Krauss S
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1833. PubMed ID: 30369891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.