113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18488961)
21. IPEM code of practice for high-energy photon therapy dosimetry based on the NPL absorbed dose calibration service.
Eaton DJ; Bass G; Booker P; Byrne J; Duane S; Frame J; Grattan M; Thomas RA; Thorp N; Nisbet A
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Sep; 65(19):195006. PubMed ID: 32503026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Determination of consensus k
Andreo P; Burns DT; Kapsch RP; McEwen M; Vatnitsky S; Andersen CE; Ballester F; Borbinha J; Delaunay F; Francescon P; Hanlon MD; Mirzakhanian L; Muir B; Ojala J; Oliver CP; Pimpinella M; Pinto M; de Prez LA; Seuntjens J; Sommier L; Teles P; Tikkanen J; Vijande J; Zink K
Phys Med Biol; 2020 May; 65(9):095011. PubMed ID: 32182598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Measurement of peak correction factor of Farmer chamber for calibration of flattening filter free (FFF) clinical photon beams].
Kontra G; Major T; Polgár C
Magy Onkol; 2015 Jun; 59(2):119-23. PubMed ID: 26035159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of IPSM 1990 photon dosimetry code of practice with IAEA TRS-398 and AAPM TG-51.
Castrillón SV; Henríquez FC
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2009 Jan; 10(1):136-146. PubMed ID: 19223831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Ion recombination correction in the Clatterbridge Centre of Oncology clinical proton beam.
Palmans H; Thomas R; Kacperek A
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Feb; 51(4):903-17. PubMed ID: 16467586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. An absolute dose determination of helical tomotherapy accelerator, TomoTherapy High-Art II.
Bailat CJ; Buchillier T; Pachoud M; Moeckli R; Bochud FO
Med Phys; 2009 Sep; 36(9):3891-6. PubMed ID: 19810461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Which accelerator photon beams are "clinic-like" for reference dosimetry purposes?
Kalach NI; Rogers DW
Med Phys; 2003 Jul; 30(7):1546-55. PubMed ID: 12906172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Electron beam quality correction factors for plane-parallel ionization chambers: Monte Carlo calculations using the PENELOPE system.
Sempau J; Andreo P; Aldana J; Mazurier J; Salvat F
Phys Med Biol; 2004 Sep; 49(18):4427-44. PubMed ID: 15509075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Linear-accelerator X-ray output: a multicentre chamber-based intercomparison study in Australia and New Zealand.
Ebert MA; Howlett SJ; Harrison K; Cornes D; Hamilton CS; Denham JD
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2008 Dec; 31(4):268-79. PubMed ID: 19239053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Dosimetry of clinical neutron and proton beams: an overview of recommendations.
Vynckier S; ;
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 110(1-4):565-72. PubMed ID: 15353710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Ionization chamber dosimetry of small photon fields: a Monte Carlo study on stopping-power ratios for radiosurgery and IMRT beams.
Sánchez-Doblado F; Andreo P; Capote R; Leal A; Perucha M; Arráns R; Núñez L; Mainegra E; Lagares JI; Carrasco E
Phys Med Biol; 2003 Jul; 48(14):2081-99. PubMed ID: 12894972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Calculated absorbed-dose ratios, TG51/TG21, for most widely used cylindrical and parallel-plate ion chambers over a range of photon and electron energies.
Tailor RC; Hanson WF
Med Phys; 2002 Jul; 29(7):1464-72. PubMed ID: 12148727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Measurement of ionization chamber absorbed dose k(Q) factors in megavoltage photon beams.
McEwen MR
Med Phys; 2010 May; 37(5):2179-93. PubMed ID: 20527552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effective point of measurement of thimble ion chambers in megavoltage photon beams.
Tessier F; Kawrakow I
Med Phys; 2010 Jan; 37(1):96-107. PubMed ID: 20175470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Combining tissue-phantom ratios to provide a beam-quality specifier for flattening filter free photon beams.
Dalaryd M; Knöös T; Ceberg C
Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111716. PubMed ID: 25370630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Influence of initial electron beam parameters on Monte Carlo calculated absorbed dose distributions for radiotherapy photon beams.
Tzedakis A; Damilakis JE; Mazonakis M; Stratakis J; Varveris H; Gourtsoyiannis N
Med Phys; 2004 Apr; 31(4):907-13. PubMed ID: 15125009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Absorbed dose determination with plane-parallel chambers.
Austerlitz C
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2003; 106(3):273-6. PubMed ID: 14690331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Direct calibration in megavoltage photon beams using Monte Carlo conversion factor: validation and clinical implications.
Wright T; Lye JE; Ramanathan G; Harty PD; Oliver C; Webb DV; Butler DJ
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Jan; 60(2):883-904. PubMed ID: 25565406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Advantage and limitations of weighting factors and weighted dose quantities and their units in boron neutron capture therapy.
Rassow J; Sauerwein W; Wittig A; Bourhis-Martin E; Hideghéty K; Moss R
Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1128-34. PubMed ID: 15191301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Use of parallel-plate ionization chambers in reference dosimetry of NOVAC and LIAC
Scalchi P; Ciccotelli A; Felici G; Petrucci A; Massafra R; Piazzi V; D'Avenia P; Cavagnetto F; Cattani F; Romagnoli R; Soriani A
Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 44(1):321-332. PubMed ID: 28102948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
