These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18489183)

  • 1. Limitations of maximum likelihood estimation procedures when a majority of the observations are below the limit of detection.
    Jain RB; Wang RY
    Anal Chem; 2008 Jun; 80(12):4767-72. PubMed ID: 18489183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of maximum likelihood procedures to estimate left censored observations.
    Jain RB; Caudill SP; Wang RY; Monsell E
    Anal Chem; 2008 Feb; 80(4):1124-32. PubMed ID: 18197633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Imputation of data values that are less than a detection limit.
    Succop PA; Clark S; Chen M; Galke W
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2004 Jul; 1(7):436-41. PubMed ID: 15238313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimating mean exposures from censored data: exposure to benzene in the Australian petroleum industry.
    Glass DC; Gray CN
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2001 Jun; 45(4):275-82. PubMed ID: 11378148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Geometric mean estimation from pooled samples.
    Caudill SP; Turner WE; Patterson DG
    Chemosphere; 2007 Sep; 69(3):371-80. PubMed ID: 17618673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of techniques for assessing central tendency in left-censored data using PCB and p,p'DDE contaminant concentrations from Michigan's Bald Eagle Biosentinel Program.
    Leith KF; Bowerman WW; Wierda MR; Best DA; Grubb TG; Sikarske JG
    Chemosphere; 2010 Jun; 80(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 20416924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantification of variability and uncertainty for censored data sets and application to air toxic emission factors.
    Zhao Y; Frey HC
    Risk Anal; 2004 Aug; 24(4):1019-34. PubMed ID: 15357825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of several methods for analyzing censored data.
    Hewett P; Ganser GH
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2007 Oct; 51(7):611-32. PubMed ID: 17940277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Maximum likelihood estimates of mean and variance of occupation radiation doses subjected to minimum detection levels.
    Datta D; Singh S; Johnson BE; Kushwaha HS
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(4):411-8. PubMed ID: 18083720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Model-based imputation approach for data analysis in the presence of non-detects.
    Krishnamoorthy K; Mallick A; Mathew T
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2009 Apr; 53(3):249-63. PubMed ID: 19181626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An accurate substitution method for analyzing censored data.
    Ganser GH; Hewett P
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2010 Apr; 7(4):233-44. PubMed ID: 20169489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of the Gould-Shih procedure for sample size re-estimation.
    Waksman JA
    Pharm Stat; 2007; 6(1):53-65. PubMed ID: 17133631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The maximally exposed individual--comparison of maximum likelihood estimation of high quantiles to an extreme value estimate.
    Wilson MD; McCormick WP; Hinton TG
    Risk Anal; 2004 Oct; 24(5):1143-51. PubMed ID: 15563284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On the consequence of substituting maximum likelihood estimates for the observations below the limit of detection.
    Jain RB
    Chemosphere; 2016 Feb; 144():2044-51. PubMed ID: 26580720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of lognormally distributed exposure data with repeated measures and values below the limit of detection using SAS.
    Jin Y; Hein MJ; Deddens JA; Hines CJ
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2011 Jan; 55(1):97-112. PubMed ID: 21177260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nearly unbiased estimators for the three-parameter Weibull distribution with greater efficiency than the iterative likelihood method.
    Cousineau D
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Feb; 62(Pt 1):167-91. PubMed ID: 18177546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. About estimating the limit of detection of heteroscedastic analytical systems.
    Desimoni E; Brunetti B
    Anal Chim Acta; 2009 Nov; 655(1-2):30-7. PubMed ID: 19925912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A restricted maximum likelihood estimator for truncated height samples.
    A'Hearn B
    Econ Hum Biol; 2004 Mar; 2(1):5-19. PubMed ID: 15463990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Maximum-likelihood estimation: a mathematical model for quantitation in nuclear medicine.
    Müller SP; Kijewski MF; Moore SC; Holman BL
    J Nucl Med; 1990 Oct; 31(10):1693-701. PubMed ID: 2213195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nonparametric methods for measurements below detection limit.
    Zhang D; Fan C; Zhang J; Zhang CH
    Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(4):700-15. PubMed ID: 19035469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.