47 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18489478)
1. Fracture strength of tooth fragment reattachments with postpone bevel and overcontour reconstruction.
Stellini E; Stomaci D; Stomaci M; Petrone N; Favero L
Dent Traumatol; 2008 Jun; 24(3):283-8. PubMed ID: 18489478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparing fracture resistance on bovine incisors restored by tooth fragment reattachment versus direct composite restoration techniques.
Aharonian S; Schachter AD; Masri M; Tunis TS; Blumer S; Brosh T; Ratson T
Dent Traumatol; 2024 Jun; 40(3):298-305. PubMed ID: 37997669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative evaluation of three materials used for fragment reattachment in uncomplicated crown fracture-An in vitro study using bovine teeth.
Jhunjhunwala G; Tewari N; Atif M; Morankar R; Mathur VP; Bansal K
Dent Traumatol; 2024 Feb; 40(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 37731287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Analyzing the Impact of Different Bonding Protocol Strategies to Improve the Fracture Resistance of Uncomplicated Crown Fractures on Tooth Fracture Reattachment in Permanent Anterior Teeth: An In-vitro Study.
Mahale VD; Solete P; Priscilla Antony D; Adimulapu HS; M H; Sambandam V
Cureus; 2024 Mar; 16(3):e56127. PubMed ID: 38618357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A biological approach to crown fracture: Fracture reattachment: A report of two cases.
Vijayaprabha K; Marwah N; Dutta S
Contemp Clin Dent; 2012 Sep; 3(Suppl 2):S194-8. PubMed ID: 23230362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Case report. Elbow monoarthritis revealing B cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Neri R; Giorgetti M; Zampa V; Iacopetti V; Vannucci P; Tognetti A; Bombardieri S
Clin Rheumatol; 2013 Mar; 32 Suppl 1():S111-4. PubMed ID: 20941518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. AGE AND REASONS OF THE FIRST DENTAL VISIT OF CHILDREN IN LEBANON.
Daou MH; Eden E; El Osta N
J Med Liban; 2016; 64(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 27169161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Myopia Control: A Review.
Walline JJ
Eye Contact Lens; 2016 Jan; 42(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 26513719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The impact of stage, grade, and mucinous histology on the efficacy of systemic chemotherapy in adenocarcinomas of the appendix: Analysis of the National Cancer Data Base.
Asare EA; Compton CC; Hanna NN; Kosinski LA; Washington MK; Kakar S; Weiser MR; Overman MJ
Cancer; 2016 Jan; 122(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 26506400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prevention of gastrointestinal events in patients on antithrombotic therapy in the peri-endoscopy period: review of new evidence and recommendations from recent guidelines.
Tang RS; Chan FK
Dig Endosc; 2015 Jul; 27(5):562-71. PubMed ID: 25819537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Antituberculosis drug-induced liver injury in chronic hepatitis and cirrhosis.
Park WB; Kim W; Lee KL; Yim JJ; Kim M; Jung YJ; Kim NJ; Kim DH; Kim YJ; Yoon JH; Oh MD; Lee HS
J Infect; 2010 Oct; 61(4):323-9. PubMed ID: 20670648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The treatment of unreduced dislocation of the shoulder. A review of 12 cases.
Postacchini F; Facchini M
Ital J Orthop Traumatol; 1987 Mar; 13(1):15-26. PubMed ID: 3692794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fracture resistance of tooth fragment reattachment: effects of different preparation techniques and adhesive materials.
Pusman E; Cehreli ZC; Altay N; Unver B; Saracbasi O; Ozgun G
Dent Traumatol; 2010 Feb; 26(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 20089057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Long-term survival of fragment bonding in the treatment of fractured crowns: a multicenter clinical study.
Andreasen FM; Norén JG; Andreasen JO; Engelhardtsen S; Lindh-Strömberg U
Quintessence Int; 1995 Oct; 26(10):669-81. PubMed ID: 8935108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reattachment of Fractured Tooth: A Comprehensive Review.
Rathod P; Mankar N; Nikhade P; Chandak M; Patel A; Ikhar A
Cureus; 2024 Apr; 16(4):e57715. PubMed ID: 38711713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effects of different cavity disinfectants on fracture resistance of tooth fragment reattachments.
Gonulol N; Sen Tunc E; Kalyoncuoglu E; Ozcelik S; Gokturk H
Eur Oral Res; 2023 Jan; 57(1):10-15. PubMed ID: 37020635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of different tooth preparation and bonding techniques on the fracture resistance of tooth fragment reattachment.
Nagi SM; Khadr SM
Biomater Investig Dent; 2021; 8(1):112-118. PubMed ID: 34350419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative Evaluation of the Fracture Resistance of Two Different Fiber-reinforced Composite Restorations with Particulate Filler Composite Restorations.
Patnana AK; Narasimha Rao VV; Chandrabhatla SK; Rajasekhar VR
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2018; 11(4):277-282. PubMed ID: 30397370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Efficacy of Palatal Applications on Fracture Resistance of Reattached Maxillary Central Incisors: An
Yikilgan İ; Guven N; Kedıcı Alp C; Tokar E; Topuz O; Kamak H
Appl Bionics Biomech; 2017; 2017():9124545. PubMed ID: 29440865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fracture resistance of reattached fragments using three different techniques with emphasis on vertical grooves and fiber-reinforced composite post: A novel technique.
Karre D; Muppa R; Duddu MK; Nallachakrava S
J Conserv Dent; 2017; 20(6):474-478. PubMed ID: 29430104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
