These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18489557)

  • 1. Meta-analytically quantifying the reliability and biasability of forensic experts.
    Dror I; Rosenthal R
    J Forensic Sci; 2008 Jul; 53(4):900-3. PubMed ID: 18489557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contextual information renders experts vulnerable to making erroneous identifications.
    Dror IE; Charlton D; Péron AE
    Forensic Sci Int; 2006 Jan; 156(1):74-8. PubMed ID: 16325362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Expertise in fingerprint identification.
    Thompson MB; Tangen JM; McCarthy DJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2013 Nov; 58(6):1519-30. PubMed ID: 23786258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Will the introduction of an emotional context affect fingerprint analysis and decision-making?
    Hall LJ; Player E
    Forensic Sci Int; 2008 Oct; 181(1-3):36-9. PubMed ID: 18849126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Nature of expert knowledge--psychological research].
    Vizek Vidović V; Rovan D
    Lijec Vjesn; 2006; 128(1-2):56-60. PubMed ID: 16640229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Discrepancies in expert decision-making in forensic fingerprint examination.
    Mustonen V; Hakkarainen K; Tuunainen J; Pohjola P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Sep; 254():215-26. PubMed ID: 26254629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The impact of human-technology cooperation and distributed cognition in forensic science: biasing effects of AFIS contextual information on human experts.
    Dror IE; Wertheim K; Fraser-Mackenzie P; Walajtys J
    J Forensic Sci; 2012 Mar; 57(2):343-52. PubMed ID: 22212067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biasability and reliability of expert forensic document examiners.
    Dror IE; Scherr KC; Mohammed LA; MacLean CL; Cunningham L
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Jan; 318():110610. PubMed ID: 33358191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Subjectivity and bias in forensic DNA mixture interpretation.
    Dror IE; Hampikian G
    Sci Justice; 2011 Dec; 51(4):204-8. PubMed ID: 22137054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Testing for potential contextual bias effects during the verification stage of the ACE-V methodology when conducting fingerprint comparisons.
    Langenburg G; Champod C; Wertheim P
    J Forensic Sci; 2009 May; 54(3):571-82. PubMed ID: 19432737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cognitive issues in fingerprint analysis: inter- and intra-expert consistency and the effect of a 'target' comparison.
    Dror IE; Champod C; Langenburg G; Charlton D; Hunt H; Rosenthal R
    Forensic Sci Int; 2011 May; 208(1-3):10-7. PubMed ID: 21129867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Informing the judgments of fingerprint analysts using quality metric and statistical assessment tools.
    Langenburg G; Champod C; Genessay T
    Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Jun; 219(1-3):183-98. PubMed ID: 22269131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of contextual information on professional judgment: Reliability and biasability of expert workplace safety inspectors.
    MacLean CL; Dror IE
    J Safety Res; 2021 Jun; 77():13-22. PubMed ID: 34092303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A hierarchy of expert performance as applied to forensic anthropology.
    Hartley S; Winburn AP
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 Sep; 66(5):1617-1626. PubMed ID: 34180547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Judicial gatekeeping and the social construction of the admissibility of expert testimony.
    Merlino ML; Murray CI; Richardson JT
    Behav Sci Law; 2008; 26(2):187-206. PubMed ID: 18344168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The power of contextual effects in forensic anthropology: a study of biasability in the visual interpretations of trauma analysis on skeletal remains.
    Nakhaeizadeh S; Hanson I; Dozzi N
    J Forensic Sci; 2014 Sep; 59(5):1177-83. PubMed ID: 24666192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Human matching performance of genuine crime scene latent fingerprints.
    Thompson MB; Tangen JM; McCarthy DJ
    Law Hum Behav; 2014 Feb; 38(1):84-93. PubMed ID: 23876092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Expert systems in pulmonology].
    Masić I; Ridanović Z; Pandza H
    Med Arh; 1999; 53(3 Suppl 1):39-42. PubMed ID: 10546467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of novice and expert nurses' cue collection during clinical decision-making: verbal protocol analysis.
    Hoffman KA; Aitken LM; Duffield C
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Oct; 46(10):1335-44. PubMed ID: 19555954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Combining experts' judgments: comparison of algorithmic methods using synthetic data.
    Hammitt JK; Zhang Y
    Risk Anal; 2013 Jan; 33(1):109-20. PubMed ID: 22583060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.