These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
43. African and North American populations of Drosophila melanogaster are very different at the DNA level. Begun DJ; Aquadro CF Nature; 1993 Oct; 365(6446):548-50. PubMed ID: 8413609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Assortative mating in Drosophila adapted to a microsite ecological gradient. Singh SR; Rashkovetsky E; Iliadi K; Nevo E; Korol A Behav Genet; 2005 Nov; 35(6):753-64. PubMed ID: 16273320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Effect of bottlenecks on incipient sexual isolation, mating activity and fertility in Drosophila malerkotliana. Hegde SN; Krishna MS Indian J Exp Biol; 1996 May; 34(5):440-3. PubMed ID: 9063077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Genetics of Drosophila simulans male mating discrimination in crosses with D. melanogaster. Carracedo MC; Asenjo A; Casares P Heredity (Edinb); 2003 Sep; 91(3):202-7. PubMed ID: 12939619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Mating propensity of Indian Drosophila melanogaster populations with D. simulans: a nonadaptive latitudinal cline. Das A; Mohanty S; Capy P; David JR Heredity (Edinb); 1995 May; 74 ( Pt 5)():562-6. PubMed ID: 7759292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Mating-induced recombination in fruit flies. Priest NK; Roach DA; Galloway LF Evolution; 2007 Jan; 61(1):160-7. PubMed ID: 17300435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Sexual selection and immune function in Drosophila melanogaster. McKean KA; Nunney L Evolution; 2008 Feb; 62(2):386-400. PubMed ID: 18070086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Female mating experience and genetic background independently influence male mating success in fruit flies. Filice DCS; Bhargava R; Dukas R J Evol Biol; 2021 Feb; 34(2):309-318. PubMed ID: 33128417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Inheritance mode of Drosophila simulans female mating propensity with D. melanogaster males. Carracedo MC; Asenjo A; Casares P J Hered; 1998; 89(1):101-4. PubMed ID: 9487683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Sexual isolation among isofemale strains within a population of Drosophila immigrans. Ehrman L; Parsons PA Behav Genet; 1981 Mar; 11(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 7271678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Effect of chromosome arrangements on mate recognition system leading to behavioral isolation in Drosophila ananassae. Nanda P; Singh BN Genetica; 2011 Feb; 139(2):273-9. PubMed ID: 21234646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Impact of experimental design on Drosophila sexual isolation studies: direct effects and comparison to field hybridization data. Coyne JA; Elwyn S; Rolán-Alvarez E Evolution; 2005 Dec; 59(12):2588-601. PubMed ID: 16526506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Natural genetic variation in complex mating behaviors of male Drosophila melanogaster. Ruedi EA; Hughes KA Behav Genet; 2008 Jul; 38(4):424-36. PubMed ID: 18369720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Sexual isolation between Drosophila melanogaster females and D. simulans males. Male mating propensities versus success in hybridization. Jamart JA; Carracedo MC; Casares P Experientia; 1993 Jul; 49(6-7):596-8. PubMed ID: 8335085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Evolution of mating isolation between populations of Drosophila ananassae. Schug MD; Baines JF; Killon-Atwood A; Mohanty S; Das A; Grath S; Smith SG; Zargham S; McEvey SF; Stephan W Mol Ecol; 2008 Jun; 17(11):2706-21. PubMed ID: 18466237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]