290 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18489778)
1. A comparison of machine learning algorithms for chemical toxicity classification using a simulated multi-scale data model.
Judson R; Elloumi F; Setzer RW; Li Z; Shah I
BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 May; 9():241. PubMed ID: 18489778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predicting hepatotoxicity using ToxCast in vitro bioactivity and chemical structure.
Liu J; Mansouri K; Judson RS; Martin MT; Hong H; Chen M; Xu X; Thomas RS; Shah I
Chem Res Toxicol; 2015 Apr; 28(4):738-51. PubMed ID: 25697799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of finite sample size on feature selection and classification: a simulation study.
Way TW; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Chan HP
Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):907-20. PubMed ID: 20229900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Automated classification of neurological disorders of gait using spatio-temporal gait parameters.
Pradhan C; Wuehr M; Akrami F; Neuhaeusser M; Huth S; Brandt T; Jahn K; Schniepp R
J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2015 Apr; 25(2):413-22. PubMed ID: 25725811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Computer-assisted lip diagnosis on Traditional Chinese Medicine using multi-class support vector machines.
Li F; Zhao C; Xia Z; Wang Y; Zhou X; Li GZ
BMC Complement Altern Med; 2012 Aug; 12():127. PubMed ID: 22898352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improving performance of computer-aided detection scheme by combining results from two machine learning classifiers.
Park SC; Pu J; Zheng B
Acad Radiol; 2009 Mar; 16(3):266-74. PubMed ID: 19201355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Top scoring pairs for feature selection in machine learning and applications to cancer outcome prediction.
Shi P; Ray S; Zhu Q; Kon MA
BMC Bioinformatics; 2011 Sep; 12():375. PubMed ID: 21939564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Application of supervised machine learning algorithms in the classification of sagittal gait patterns of cerebral palsy children with spastic diplegia.
Zhang Y; Ma Y
Comput Biol Med; 2019 Mar; 106():33-39. PubMed ID: 30665140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Application of genetic algorithms and constructive neural networks for the analysis of microarray cancer data.
Luque-Baena RM; Urda D; Subirats JL; Franco L; Jerez JM
Theor Biol Med Model; 2014 May; 11 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S7. PubMed ID: 25077572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Feature weight estimation for gene selection: a local hyperlinear learning approach.
Cai H; Ruan P; Ng M; Akutsu T
BMC Bioinformatics; 2014 Mar; 15():70. PubMed ID: 24625071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Context based mixture model for cell phase identification in automated fluorescence microscopy.
Wang M; Zhou X; King RW; Wong ST
BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Jan; 8():32. PubMed ID: 17263881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of feature selection and classification for MALDI-MS data.
Liu Q; Sung AH; Qiao M; Chen Z; Yang JY; Yang MQ; Huang X; Deng Y
BMC Genomics; 2009 Jul; 10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S3. PubMed ID: 19594880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Recursive SVM feature selection and sample classification for mass-spectrometry and microarray data.
Zhang X; Lu X; Shi Q; Xu XQ; Leung HC; Harris LN; Iglehart JD; Miron A; Liu JS; Wong WH
BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Apr; 7():197. PubMed ID: 16606446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Machine learning-based monosaccharide profiling for tissue-specific classification of Wolfiporia extensa samples.
Hsiung SY; Deng SX; Li J; Huang SY; Liaw CK; Huang SY; Wang CC; Hsieh YSY
Carbohydr Polym; 2023 Dec; 322():121338. PubMed ID: 37839831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A stacking ensemble deep learning approach to cancer type classification based on TCGA data.
Mohammed M; Mwambi H; Mboya IB; Elbashir MK; Omolo B
Sci Rep; 2021 Aug; 11(1):15626. PubMed ID: 34341396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comprehensive evaluation of multicategory classification methods for microarray gene expression cancer diagnosis.
Statnikov A; Aliferis CF; Tsamardinos I; Hardin D; Levy S
Bioinformatics; 2005 Mar; 21(5):631-43. PubMed ID: 15374862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Recursive gene selection based on maximum margin criterion: a comparison with SVM-RFE.
Niijima S; Kuhara S
BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Dec; 7():543. PubMed ID: 17187691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18.
Raeisi Shahraki H; Pourahmad S; Zare N
Biomed Res Int; 2017; 2017():7560807. PubMed ID: 29376076
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of different chemometrics approaches for the robust classification of electronic nose data.
Gromski PS; Correa E; Vaughan AA; Wedge DC; Turner ML; Goodacre R
Anal Bioanal Chem; 2014 Nov; 406(29):7581-90. PubMed ID: 25286877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Classification complexity in myoelectric pattern recognition.
Nilsson N; Håkansson B; Ortiz-Catalan M
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2017 Jul; 14(1):68. PubMed ID: 28693533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
