These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18490090)
1. Geometric accuracy of digital volume tomography and conventional computed tomography. Eggers G; Klein J; Welzel T; Mühling J Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Dec; 46(8):639-44. PubMed ID: 18490090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Investigation on the 3 D geometric accuracy and on the image quality (MTF, SNR and NPS) of volume tomography units (CT, CBCT and DVT)]. Blendl C; Fiebich M; Voigt JM; Selbach M; Uphoff C Rofo; 2012 Jan; 184(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 22076796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The expanding influence of computed tomography and the application of computer-guided implantology. Mandelaris GA; Rosenfeld AL Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2008 Jun; 20(5):297-305; quiz 306. PubMed ID: 18649832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Megavoltage cone beam digital tomosynthesis (MV-CBDT) for image-guided radiotherapy: a clinical investigational system. Pang G; Bani-Hashemi A; Au P; O'Brien PF; Rowlands JA; Morton G; Lim T; Cheung P; Loblaw A Phys Med Biol; 2008 Feb; 53(4):999-1013. PubMed ID: 18263954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quality assurance for the geometric accuracy of cone-beam CT guidance in radiation therapy. Bissonnette JP; Moseley D; White E; Sharpe M; Purdie T; Jaffray DA Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008; 71(1 Suppl):S57-61. PubMed ID: 18406939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Image distortion and spatial resolution of a commercially available cone-beam computed tomography machine. Ballrick JW; Palomo JM; Ruch E; Amberman BD; Hans MG Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Oct; 134(4):573-82. PubMed ID: 18929276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Increase of accuracy in intraoperative navigation through high-resolution flat-panel volume computed tomography: experimental comparison with multislice computed tomography-based navigation. Bartling SH; Leinung M; Graute J; Rodt T; Dullin C; Becker H; Lenarz T; Stover T; Majdani O Otol Neurotol; 2007 Jan; 28(1):129-34. PubMed ID: 17195752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The adaptation of megavoltage cone beam CT for use in standard radiotherapy treatment planning. Thomas TH; Devakumar D; Purnima S; Ravindran BP Phys Med Biol; 2009 Apr; 54(7):2067-77. PubMed ID: 19287087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative study of image quality for MSCT and CBCT scanners for dentomaxillofacial radiology applications. Loubele M; Maes F; Jacobs R; van Steenberghe D; White SC; Suetens P Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):222-6. PubMed ID: 18583372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical indications and perspectives for intraoperative cone-beam computed tomography in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Pohlenz P; Blessmann M; Blake F; Heinrich S; Schmelzle R; Heiland M Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Mar; 103(3):412-7. PubMed ID: 17321455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A cone-beam computed tomography triple scan procedure to obtain a three-dimensional augmented virtual skull model appropriate for orthognathic surgery planning. Swennen GR; Mollemans W; De Clercq C; Abeloos J; Lamoral P; Lippens F; Neyt N; Casselman J; Schutyser F J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Mar; 20(2):297-307. PubMed ID: 19276829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of similarity measures for reconstruction-based registration in image-guided radiotherapy and surgery. Skerl D; Tomazevic D; Likar B; Pernus F Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jul; 65(3):943-53. PubMed ID: 16751077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Manufacturing splints for orthognathic surgery using a three-dimensional printer. Metzger MC; Hohlweg-Majert B; Schwarz U; Teschner M; Hammer B; Schmelzeisen R Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Feb; 105(2):e1-7. PubMed ID: 18230371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intraoperative navigation in the maxillofacial area based on 3D imaging obtained by a cone-beam device. Mischkowski RA; Zinser MJ; Ritter L; Neugebauer J; Keeve E; Zöller JE Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Aug; 36(8):687-94. PubMed ID: 17560082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Positioning accuracy in a registration-free CT-based navigation system. Brandenberger D; Birkfellner W; Baumann B; Messmer P; Huegli RW; Regazzoni P; Jacob AL Phys Med Biol; 2007 Dec; 52(23):7073-86. PubMed ID: 18029994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cone beam CT--anatomic assessment and legal issues: the new standards of care. Curley A; Hatcher DC Todays FDA; 2010; 22(4):52-5, 57-9, 61-3. PubMed ID: 20860345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An optimization-based method for geometrical calibration in cone-beam CT without dedicated phantoms. Panetta D; Belcari N; Del Guerra A; Moehrs S Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jul; 53(14):3841-61. PubMed ID: 18583729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the accuracy of cone beam computed tomography and medical computed tomography: implications for clinical diagnostics with guided surgery. Abboud M; Calvo-Guirado JL; Orentlicher G; Wahl G Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(2):536-42. PubMed ID: 23527357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The accuracy of image guided surgery based on cone beam computer tomography image data. Eggers G; Senoo H; Kane G; Mühling J Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Mar; 107(3):e41-8. PubMed ID: 19157914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice. Scarfe WC; Farman AG; Sukovic P J Can Dent Assoc; 2006 Feb; 72(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 16480609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]