These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

542 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18490093)

  • 1. The challenge of reproductive and developmental toxicology under REACH.
    Scialli AR
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2008 Jul; 51(2):244-50. PubMed ID: 18490093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. REACH and reproductive and developmental toxicology: still questions.
    Scialli AR; Guikema AJ
    Syst Biol Reprod Med; 2012 Feb; 58(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 22239083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Animal testing and alternative approaches for the human health risk assessment under the proposed new European chemicals regulation.
    Höfer T; Gerner I; Gundert-Remy U; Liebsch M; Schulte A; Spielmann H; Vogel R; Wettig K
    Arch Toxicol; 2004 Oct; 78(10):549-64. PubMed ID: 15170526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Alternative test methods in inhalation toxicology: challenges and opportunities.
    Costa DL
    Exp Toxicol Pathol; 2008 Jun; 60(2-3):105-9. PubMed ID: 18486462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Strengths and limitations of using repeat-dose toxicity studies to predict effects on fertility.
    Dent MP
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2007 Aug; 48(3):241-58. PubMed ID: 17512650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Integrated decision-tree testing strategies for developmental and reproductive toxicity with respect to the requirements of the EU REACH legislation.
    Grindon C; Combes R; Cronin MT; Roberts DW; Garrod JF
    Altern Lab Anim; 2008 Feb; 36(1):65-80. PubMed ID: 18333715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Alternative methods to safety studies in experimental animals: role in the risk assessment of chemicals under the new European Chemicals Legislation (REACH).
    Lilienblum W; Dekant W; Foth H; Gebel T; Hengstler JG; Kahl R; Kramer PJ; Schweinfurth H; Wollin KM
    Arch Toxicol; 2008 Apr; 82(4):211-36. PubMed ID: 18322675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A modular one-generation reproduction study as a flexible testing system for regulatory safety assessment.
    Vogel R; Seidle T; Spielmann H
    Reprod Toxicol; 2010 Apr; 29(2):242-5. PubMed ID: 19808091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The European Union's REACH regulation: a review of its history and requirements.
    Williams ES; Panko J; Paustenbach DJ
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2009; 39(7):553-75. PubMed ID: 19650717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The integrated project ReProTect: a novel approach in reproductive toxicity hazard assessment.
    Hareng L; Pellizzer C; Bremer S; Schwarz M; Hartung T
    Reprod Toxicol; 2005; 20(3):441-52. PubMed ID: 15899576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A category approach for reproductive effects of phthalates.
    Fabjan E; Hulzebos E; Mennes W; Piersma AH
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2006 Oct; 36(9):695-726. PubMed ID: 17050082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Re-evaluation of animal numbers and costs for in vivo tests to accomplish REACH legislation requirements for chemicals - a report by the transatlantic think tank for toxicology (t(4)).
    Rovida C; Hartung T
    ALTEX; 2009; 26(3):187-208. PubMed ID: 19907906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A review of the status of alternative approaches to animal testing and the development of integrated testing strategies for assessing the toxicity of chemicals under REACH--a summary of a DEFRA-funded project conducted by Liverpool John Moores University and FRAME.
    Grindon C; Combes R; Cronin MT; Roberts DW; Garrod J
    Altern Lab Anim; 2006 Mar; 34 Suppl 1():149-58. PubMed ID: 16555968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of reproductive toxicity under REACH.
    Aulmann W
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2012 Jul; 63(2):286-90. PubMed ID: 22475931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inhalation toxicity studies: OECD guidelines in relation to REACH and scientific developments.
    Arts JH; Muijser H; Jonker D; van de Sandt JJ; Bos PM; Feron VJ
    Exp Toxicol Pathol; 2008 Jun; 60(2-3):125-33. PubMed ID: 18455380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. REACH, non-testing approaches and the urgent need for a change in mind set.
    Schaafsma G; Kroese ED; Tielemans EL; Van de Sandt JJ; Van Leeuwen CJ
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2009 Feb; 53(1):70-80. PubMed ID: 19061930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Developmental toxicity testing from animal towards embryonic stem cells.
    Pellizzer C; Bremer S; Hartung T
    ALTEX; 2005; 22(2):47-57. PubMed ID: 15953962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Integrated decision-tree testing strategies for skin corrosion and irritation with respect to the requirements of the EU REACH legislation.
    Grindon C; Combes R; Cronin MT; Roberts DW; Garrod JF
    Altern Lab Anim; 2008 Oct; 36 Suppl 1():65-74. PubMed ID: 19025332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Critical aspects in reproductive and developmental toxicity testing of environmental chemicals.
    Buschmann J
    Reprod Toxicol; 2006 Aug; 22(2):157-63. PubMed ID: 16782303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Non-testing approaches under REACH--help or hindrance? Perspectives from a practitioner within industry.
    Patlewicz G; Chen MW; Bellin CA
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2011 Mar; 22(1-2):67-88. PubMed ID: 21391142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.