These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18490482)

  • 1. A mathematical proof and example that Bayes's Theorem is fundamental to actuarial estimates of sexual recidivism risk.
    Donaldson T; Wollert R
    Sex Abuse; 2008 Jun; 20(2):206-17. PubMed ID: 18490482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Actuarial risk assessment: commentary on Berlin et al.
    Hart SD
    Sex Abuse; 2003 Oct; 15(4):383-8. PubMed ID: 14571542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Violent sex offenses: how are they best measured from official records?
    Rice ME; Harris GT; Lang C; Cormier C
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Aug; 30(4):525-41. PubMed ID: 16770703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Men in his category have a 50% likelihood, but which half is he in? Comments on Berlin, Galbreath, Geary, and McGlone.
    Harris G
    Sex Abuse; 2003 Oct; 15(4):389-92. PubMed ID: 14571543
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Long-term predictive validity of the risk matrix 2000: a comparison with the static-99 and the sex offender risk appraisal guide.
    Kingston DA; Yates PM; Firestone P; Babchishin K; Bradford JM
    Sex Abuse; 2008 Dec; 20(4):466-84. PubMed ID: 18840901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sexual offenders: a meta-analysis of 118 prediction studies.
    Hanson RK; Morton-Bourgon KE
    Psychol Assess; 2009 Mar; 21(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 19290762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sex offenders and actuarial risk assessments: ethical considerations.
    Campbell TW
    Behav Sci Law; 2003; 21(2):269-79. PubMed ID: 12645049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bayesian statistical inference in psychology: comment on Trafimow (2003).
    Lee MD; Wagenmakers EJ
    Psychol Rev; 2005 Jul; 112(3):662-668. PubMed ID: 16060758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The use of actuarials at civil commitment hearings to predict the likelihood of future sexual violence.
    Berlin FS; Galbreath NW; Geary B; McGlone G
    Sex Abuse; 2003 Oct; 15(4):377-82. PubMed ID: 14571541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The sex offender treatment intervention and progress scale (SOTIPS): psychometric properties and incremental predictive validity with static-99R.
    McGrath RJ; Lasher MP; Cumming GF
    Sex Abuse; 2012 Oct; 24(5):431-58. PubMed ID: 22368161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hypothesis testing and theory evaluation at the boundaries: surprising insights from Bayes's theorem.
    Trafimow D
    Psychol Rev; 2003 Jul; 110(3):526-35. PubMed ID: 12885113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hearing discordant voices: some notes on using Bayes's theorem in interpretive inquiry.
    Miller SI; Fredericks M
    Qual Health Res; 1998 May; 8(3):393-8. PubMed ID: 10558338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Enabling a powerful marine and offshore decision-support solution through Bayesian network technique.
    Eleye-Datubo AG; Wall A; Saajedi A; Wang J
    Risk Anal; 2006 Jun; 26(3):695-721. PubMed ID: 16834628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The impact of surgical castration on sexual recidivism risk among sexually violent predatory offenders.
    Weinberger LE; Sreenivasan S; Garrick T; Osran H
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(1):16-36. PubMed ID: 15809235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sexually violent predator risk assessments with the violence risk appraisal guide-revised: A shaky practice.
    Abbott BR
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2017; 52():62-73. PubMed ID: 28400064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Bayesian approach to the group versus individual prediction controversy in actuarial risk assessment.
    Scurich N; John RS
    Law Hum Behav; 2012 Jun; 36(3):237-46. PubMed ID: 22667813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predictor combination in binary decision-making situations.
    McGrath RE
    Psychol Assess; 2008 Sep; 20(3):195-205. PubMed ID: 18778156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Alice in actuarial-land: through the looking glass of changing Static-99 norms.
    Sreenivasan S; Weinberger LE; Frances A; Cusworth-Walker S
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2010; 38(3):400-6. PubMed ID: 20852227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Risk and the preventive detention of sex offenders in Australia and the United States.
    Mercado CC; Ogloff JR
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2007; 30(1):49-59. PubMed ID: 17157911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Actuarial risk assessment models: a review of critical issues related to violence and sex-offender recidivism assessments.
    Sreenivasan S; Kirkish P; Garrick T; Weinberger LE; Phenix A
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2000; 28(4):438-48. PubMed ID: 11196254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.