529 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18490862)
21. Speech-in-noise perception in high-functioning individuals with autism or Asperger's syndrome.
Alcántara JI; Weisblatt EJ; Moore BC; Bolton PF
J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 2004 Sep; 45(6):1107-14. PubMed ID: 15257667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The French digit triplet test: a hearing screening tool for speech intelligibility in noise.
Jansen S; Luts H; Wagener KC; Frachet B; Wouters J
Int J Audiol; 2010 May; 49(5):378-87. PubMed ID: 20380611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Revision, extension, and evaluation of a binaural speech intelligibility model.
Beutelmann R; Brand T; Kollmeier B
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Apr; 127(4):2479-97. PubMed ID: 20370031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The digits-in-noise test: assessing auditory speech recognition abilities in noise.
Smits C; Theo Goverts S; Festen JM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Mar; 133(3):1693-706. PubMed ID: 23464039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. On the limited transfer of information with noise-induced hearing loss.
Smoorenburg GF
Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():38-46. PubMed ID: 2356737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A Speech Intelligibility Index-based approach to predict the speech reception threshold for sentences in fluctuating noise for normal-hearing listeners.
Rhebergen KS; Versfeld NJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Apr; 117(4 Pt 1):2181-92. PubMed ID: 15898659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Some aspects of methodology in speech audiometry.
Hagerman B
Scand Audiol Suppl; 1984; 21():1-25. PubMed ID: 6589731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Speech reception thresholds in noise and self-reported hearing disability in a general adult population.
Smits C; Kramer SE; Houtgast T
Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):538-49. PubMed ID: 16957503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Speech-in-noise screening tests by internet, part 3: test sensitivity for uncontrolled parameters in domestic usage.
Leensen MC; Dreschler WA
Int J Audiol; 2013 Oct; 52(10):658-69. PubMed ID: 23819619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Relationship between masking release in fluctuating maskers and speech reception thresholds in stationary noise.
Christiansen C; Dau T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1655-66. PubMed ID: 22978894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The benefit obtained from visually displayed text from an automatic speech recognizer during listening to speech presented in noise.
Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Kessens JM; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):838-52. PubMed ID: 18633325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Polish sentence matrix test for speech intelligibility measurement in noise.
Ozimek E; Warzybok A; Kutzner D
Int J Audiol; 2010 Jun; 49(6):444-54. PubMed ID: 20482292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Speech intelligibility in background noise with ideal binary time-frequency masking.
Wang D; Kjems U; Pedersen MS; Boldt JB; Lunner T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Apr; 125(4):2336-47. PubMed ID: 19354408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A Spanish matrix sentence test for assessing speech reception thresholds in noise.
Hochmuth S; Brand T; Zokoll MA; Castro FZ; Wardenga N; Kollmeier B
Int J Audiol; 2012 Jul; 51(7):536-44. PubMed ID: 22537033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Development and evaluation of the Turkish matrix sentence test.
Zokoll MA; Fidan D; Türkyılmaz D; Hochmuth S; Ergenç İ; Sennaroğlu G; Kollmeier B
Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():51-61. PubMed ID: 26443486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Auditory models of suprathreshold distortion and speech intelligibility in persons with impaired hearing.
Bernstein JG; Summers V; Grassi E; Grant KW
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):307-28. PubMed ID: 23636211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Binaural speech intelligibility in rooms with variations in spatial location of sources and modulation depth of noise interferers.
Collin B; Lavandier M
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1146-59. PubMed ID: 23927114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Speech recognition with varying numbers and types of competing talkers by normal-hearing, cochlear-implant, and implant simulation subjects.
Cullington HE; Zeng FG
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jan; 123(1):450-61. PubMed ID: 18177173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [A recommendation for calibration and choice of masking noises used in speech audiometry].
Ingold L; Tschopp K
Laryngorhinootologie; 1992 Jun; 71(6):315-8. PubMed ID: 1637453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies III: Speech Intelligibility of Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
Völker C; Warzybok A; Ernst SM
Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
