These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

307 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18490863)

  • 1. Client-based adjustments of hearing aid gain: the effect of different control configurations.
    Dreschler WA; Keidser G; Convery E; Dillon H
    Ear Hear; 2008 Apr; 29(2):214-27. PubMed ID: 18490863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of the base line response on self-adjustments of hearing aid gain.
    Keidser G; Dillon H; Convery E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Sep; 124(3):1668-81. PubMed ID: 19045657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The design and evaluation of a hearing aid with trainable amplification parameters.
    Zakis JA; Dillon H; McDermott HJ
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):812-30. PubMed ID: 17982368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of different speech processor and hearing aid settings on speech perception outcomes in electric acoustic stimulation patients.
    Vermeire K; Anderson I; Flynn M; Van de Heyning P
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jan; 29(1):76-86. PubMed ID: 18091097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using genetic algorithms with subjective input from human subjects: implications for fitting hearing aids and cochlear implants.
    Başkent D; Eiler CL; Edwards B
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):370-80. PubMed ID: 17485986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of noise source configuration on directional benefit using symmetric and asymmetric directional hearing aid fittings.
    Hornsby BW; Ricketts TA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 17496669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Vibrant soundbridge versus conventional hearing aid in sensorineural high-frequency hearing loss: a prospective study.
    Truy E; Philibert B; Vesson JF; Labassi S; Collet L
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Aug; 29(5):684-7. PubMed ID: 18434928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Acclimatization in first-time hearing aid users using three different fitting protocols.
    Reber MB; Kompis M
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2005 Dec; 32(4):345-51. PubMed ID: 16039083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical evaluation of higher stimulation rates in the nucleus research platform 8 system.
    Plant K; Holden L; Skinner M; Arcaroli J; Whitford L; Law MA; Nel E
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):381-93. PubMed ID: 17485987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Real-ear measurement verification for open, non-occluding hearing instruments.
    Lantz J; Jensen OD; Haastrup A; Olsen SØ
    Int J Audiol; 2007 Jan; 46(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 17365050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Personality, hearing problems, and amplification characteristics: contributions to self-report hearing aid outcomes.
    Cox RM; Alexander GC; Gray GA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):141-62. PubMed ID: 17496667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Verification of improved patient outcomes with a partially implantable hearing aid, The SOUNDTEC direct hearing system.
    Roland PS; Shoup AG; Shea MC; Richey HS; Jones DB
    Laryngoscope; 2001 Oct; 111(10):1682-6. PubMed ID: 11801925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Frequency-compression outcomes in listeners with steeply sloping audiograms.
    Simpson A; Hersbach AA; McDermott HJ
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Nov; 45(11):619-29. PubMed ID: 17118905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Behavioral assessment of adaptive feedback equalization in a digital hearing aid.
    French-St George M; Wood DJ; Engebretson AM
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 8263825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Do experienced hearing aid users know how to use their hearing AIDS correctly?
    Desjardins JL; Doherty KA
    Am J Audiol; 2009 Jun; 18(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 19380509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of auditory steady-state responses and auditory brainstem responses in audiometric assessment of adults with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Lin YH; Ho HC; Wu HP
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2009 Apr; 36(2):140-5. PubMed ID: 18620826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Neuromonics Tinnitus Treatment: third clinical trial.
    Davis PB; Paki B; Hanley PJ
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):242-59. PubMed ID: 17496674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Real-life efficacy and reliability of training a hearing aid.
    Keidser G; Alamudi K
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):619-29. PubMed ID: 23575461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the desired sensation level [input/output] algorithm for adults with hearing loss: the acceptable range for amplified conversational speech.
    Jenstad LM; Bagatto MP; Seewald RC; Scollie SD; Cornelisse LE; Scicluna R
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):793-811. PubMed ID: 17982367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interpretation of pure-tone thresholds in sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL): a review of measurement variability and age-specific references.
    Lemkens N; Vermeire K; Brokx JP; Fransen E; Van Camp G; Van De Heyning PH
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 2002; 56(4):341-52. PubMed ID: 12528251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.