These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18491142)

  • 81. Combining genetic association study designs: a GWAS case study.
    Estus JL; ; Fardo DW
    Front Genet; 2013; 4():186. PubMed ID: 24098305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 82. Development and application of genomic control methods for genome-wide association studies using non-additive models.
    Tsepilov YA; Ried JS; Strauch K; Grallert H; van Duijn CM; Axenovich TI; Aulchenko YS
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(12):e81431. PubMed ID: 24358113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 83. Calculation of exact p-values when SNPs are tested using multiple genetic models.
    Talluri R; Wang J; Shete S
    BMC Genet; 2014 Jun; 15():75. PubMed ID: 24950707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 84. SNP selection in genome-wide association studies via penalized support vector machine with MAX test.
    Kim J; Sohn I; Kim DD; Jung SH
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2013; 2013():340678. PubMed ID: 24174989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 85. Pathway-based identification of SNPs predictive of survival.
    Pang H; Hauser M; Minvielle S
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2011 Jun; 19(6):704-9. PubMed ID: 21368918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 86. Testing calibration of risk models at extremes of disease risk.
    Song M; Kraft P; Joshi AD; Barrdahl M; Chatterjee N
    Biostatistics; 2015 Jan; 16(1):143-54. PubMed ID: 25027274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 87. Correction for multiple testing in a gene region.
    Hendricks AE; Dupuis J; Logue MW; Myers RH; Lunetta KL
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2014 Mar; 22(3):414-8. PubMed ID: 23838599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 88. Efficient adaptively weighted analysis of secondary phenotypes in case-control genome-wide association studies.
    Li H; Gail MH
    Hum Hered; 2012; 73(3):159-73. PubMed ID: 22710642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 89. Sample size requirements to detect gene-environment interactions in genome-wide association studies.
    Murcray CE; Lewinger JP; Conti DV; Thomas DC; Gauderman WJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 2011 Apr; 35(3):201-10. PubMed ID: 21308767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 90. Application of the optimal discovery procedure to genetic case-control studies: comparison with p values and asymptotic Bayes factors.
    Tachmazidou I; De Iorio M; Dudbridge F
    Hum Hered; 2011; 71(1):37-49. PubMed ID: 21389730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 91. CMAX3: A Robust Statistical Test for Genetic Association Accounting for Covariates.
    Chen Z; Zang Y
    Genes (Basel); 2021 Oct; 12(11):. PubMed ID: 34828328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 92. Identification of SNP markers for canine mammary gland tumours in females based on a genome-wide association study - preliminary results.
    Mucha A; Nowak B; Dzimira S; Liszka B; Zatoń-Dobrowolska M
    J Vet Res; 2023 Sep; 67(3):427-436. PubMed ID: 37786854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 93. Pearson's test, trend test, and MAX are all trend tests with different types of scores.
    Zheng G; Joo J; Yang Y
    Ann Hum Genet; 2009 Mar; 73(2):133-40. PubMed ID: 19183346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 94. Programs for calculating the statistical powers of detecting susceptibility genes in case-control studies based on multistage designs.
    Kitamura N; Akazawa K; Miyashita A; Kuwano R; Toyabe S; Nakamura J; Nakamura N; Sato T; Hoque MA
    Bioinformatics; 2009 Jan; 25(2):272-3. PubMed ID: 19043077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 95. Rapid simulation of P values for product methods and multiple-testing adjustment in association studies.
    Seaman SR; Müller-Myhsok B
    Am J Hum Genet; 2005 Mar; 76(3):399-408. PubMed ID: 15645388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 96. A comparison of Cox and logistic regression for use in genome-wide association studies of cohort and case-cohort design.
    Staley JR; Jones E; Kaptoge S; Butterworth AS; Sweeting MJ; Wood AM; Howson JMM
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2017 Jun; 25(7):854-862. PubMed ID: 28594416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 97. Robust tests for single-marker analysis in case-control genetic association studies.
    Li Q; Zheng G; Liang X; Yu K
    Ann Hum Genet; 2009 Mar; 73(2):245-52. PubMed ID: 19208106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 98. Increasing the power of identifying gene x gene interactions in genome-wide association studies.
    Kooperberg C; Leblanc M
    Genet Epidemiol; 2008 Apr; 32(3):255-63. PubMed ID: 18200600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 99. Genome-wide association mapping with longitudinal data.
    Furlotte NA; Eskin E; Eyheramendy S
    Genet Epidemiol; 2012 Jul; 36(5):463-71. PubMed ID: 22581622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 100. A note on generalized Genome Scan Meta-Analysis statistics.
    Koziol JA; Feng AC
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Feb; 6():32. PubMed ID: 15717930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.