150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18491217)
21. Insights Into Breast Cancer Screening: A Computer Simulation of Two Contemporary Screening Strategies.
Carter KJ; Castro F; Morcos RN
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Mar; 210(3):564-571. PubMed ID: 29323554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Quality-of-life effects of screening mammography in Norway.
Zahl PH; Kalager M; Suhrke P; Nord E
Int J Cancer; 2020 Apr; 146(8):2104-2112. PubMed ID: 31254388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Attitudes, beliefs, and knowledge as predictors of nonattendance in a Swedish population-based mammography screening program.
Lagerlund M; Hedin A; Sparén P; Thurfjell E; Lambe M
Prev Med; 2000 Oct; 31(4):417-28. PubMed ID: 11006068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Quality-of-life valuations of advanced breast cancer by New Zealand women.
Milne RJ; Heaton-Brown KH; Hansen P; Thomas D; Harvey V; Cubitt A
Pharmacoeconomics; 2006; 24(3):281-92. PubMed ID: 16519549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effect of false-positive mammograms on interval breast cancer screening in a health maintenance organization.
Burman ML; Taplin SH; Herta DF; Elmore JG
Ann Intern Med; 1999 Jul; 131(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 10391809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Cost-effectiveness of mammography screening for breast cancer in a low socioeconomic group of Iranian women.
Barfar E; Rashidian A; Hosseini H; Nosratnejad S; Barooti E; Zendehdel K
Arch Iran Med; 2014 Apr; 17(4):241-5. PubMed ID: 24724599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Benefits and costs of screening and treatment for early breast cancer. Development of a basic benefit package.
Kattlove H; Liberati A; Keeler E; Brook RH
JAMA; 1995 Jan; 273(2):142-8. PubMed ID: 7799495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Breast cancer survivors' risk of interval cancers and false positive results in organized mammography screening.
Njor SH; Vejborg I; Larsen MB
Cancer Med; 2020 Aug; 9(16):6042-6050. PubMed ID: 32608178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Increasing the use of mammography: a pilot program.
Reynolds KD; West SG; Aiken LS
Health Educ Q; 1990; 17(4):429-41. PubMed ID: 2262323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The influence of previous breast cancer upon mammography utilization.
Legg JS; Fauber TL; Ozcan YA
Womens Health Issues; 2003; 13(2):62-7. PubMed ID: 12732442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Framing and labelling effects in health descriptions: quality adjusted life years for treatment of breast cancer.
Gerard K; Dobson M; Hall J
J Clin Epidemiol; 1993 Jan; 46(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 8433117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Beliefs and attitudes of Samoan women toward early detection of breast cancer and mammography utilization.
Ishida DN; Toomata-Mayer TF; Braginsky NS
Cancer; 2001 Jan; 91(1 Suppl):262-6. PubMed ID: 11148591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Mammography screening from the perspective of quality of life: a review of the literature.
Hafslund B; Nortvedt MW
Scand J Caring Sci; 2009 Sep; 23(3):539-48. PubMed ID: 19170959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. News media coverage of screening mammography for women in their 40s and tamoxifen for primary prevention of breast cancer.
Schwartz LM; Woloshin S
JAMA; 2002 Jun; 287(23):3136-42. PubMed ID: 12069679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Health-related quality of life in early breast cancer.
Groenvold M
Dan Med Bull; 2010 Sep; 57(9):B4184. PubMed ID: 20816024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Knowledge, attitude and beliefs women attending mammography units have regarding breast cancer and early diagnosis.
Nergiz-Eroglu U; Kilic D
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(7):1855-60. PubMed ID: 22126579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Perceptions of screening mammography among women aged 40-49.
Cockburn J; Pit S; Redman S
Aust N Z J Public Health; 1999 Jun; 23(3):318-21. PubMed ID: 10388180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Assessment of mammography screening and its introduction in Germany in the Statutory Early Diagnosis Program].
von Fournier D
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1999; 121(3):159-65. PubMed ID: 10209861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Breast MRI screening for average-risk women: A monte carlo simulation cost-benefit analysis.
Mango VL; Goel A; Mema E; Kwak E; Ha R
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Jun; 49(7):e216-e221. PubMed ID: 30632645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Clinical Benefits, Harms, and Cost-Effectiveness of Breast Cancer Screening for Survivors of Childhood Cancer Treated With Chest Radiation : A Comparative Modeling Study.
Yeh JM; Lowry KP; Schechter CB; Diller LR; Alagoz O; Armstrong GT; Hampton JM; Leisenring W; Liu Q; Mandelblatt JS; Miglioretti DL; Moskowitz CS; Oeffinger KC; Trentham-Dietz A; Stout NK
Ann Intern Med; 2020 Sep; 173(5):331-341. PubMed ID: 32628531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
