These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18491389)
1. In vivo evaluation of bone-bonding ability of RGD-coated porous implant using layer-by-layer electrostatic self-assembly. Yang GL; He FM; Yang XF; Wang XX; Zhao SF J Biomed Mater Res A; 2009 Jul; 90(1):175-85. PubMed ID: 18491389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In vivo effects of RGD-coated titanium implants inserted in two bone-gap models. Elmengaard B; Bechtold JE; Søballe K J Biomed Mater Res A; 2005 Nov; 75(2):249-55. PubMed ID: 16106438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of magnesium-substituted nanohydroxyapatite coating on implant osseointegration. Zhao SF; Jiang QH; Peel S; Wang XX; He FM Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24 Suppl A100():34-41. PubMed ID: 22145854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bone response to the multilayer BMP-2 gene coated porous titanium implant surface. Jiang QH; Liu L; Peel S; Yang GL; Zhao SF; He FM Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24(8):853-61. PubMed ID: 22168601 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of chemically modified SLA implants (modSLA) biofunctionalized with integrin (RGD)- and heparin (KRSR)-binding peptides. Broggini N; Tosatti S; Ferguson SJ; Schuler M; Textor M; Bornstein MM; Bosshardt DD; Buser D J Biomed Mater Res A; 2012 Mar; 100(3):703-11. PubMed ID: 22213622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Which surface properties enhance bone response to implants? Comparison of oxidized magnesium, TiUnite, and Osseotite implant surfaces. Sul YT; Johansson C; Albrektsson T Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(4):319-28. PubMed ID: 16900812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. On-Growth and In-Growth Osseointegration Enhancement in PM Porous Ti-Scaffolds by Two Different Bioactivation Strategies: Alkali Thermochemical Treatment and RGD Peptide Coating. Rappe KS; Ortiz-Hernandez M; Punset M; Molmeneu M; Barba A; Mas-Moruno C; Guillem-Marti J; Caparrós C; Rupérez E; Calero J; Manzanares MC; Gil J; Franch J Int J Mol Sci; 2022 Feb; 23(3):. PubMed ID: 35163682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of thin nano-hydroxyapatite coating on implant osseointegration in ovariectomized rats. Cheng Z; Guo C; Dong W; He FM; Zhao SF; Yang GL Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2012 Mar; 113(3):e48-53. PubMed ID: 22669157 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of a novel calcium phosphate-coated titanium porous oxide implant surface: a study in rabbits. Poulos NM; Rodriguez NA; Lee J; Rueggeberg FA; Schüpbach P; Hall J; Susin C; Wikesjö UM Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):731-8. PubMed ID: 21841981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical comparison of biomimetically and electrochemically deposited hydroxyapatite-coated porous titanium implants. Yang GL; He FM; Hu JA; Wang XX; Zhao SF J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Feb; 68(2):420-7. PubMed ID: 20116717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of strontium-substituted nanohydroxyapatite coating of porous implant surfaces on implant osseointegration in a rabbit model. Yang GL; Song LN; Jiang QH; Wang XX; Zhao SF; He FM Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(6):1332-9. PubMed ID: 23189282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In Vivo Effect of Titanium Implants with Porous Zinc-Containing Coatings Prepared by Plasma Electrolytic Oxidation Method on Osseointegration in Rabbits. He J; Feng W; Zhao BH; Zhang W; Lin Z Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(2):298–310. PubMed ID: 29420672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Osseointegration of titanium implants with a roughened surface containing hydride ion in a rabbit model. Cheng Z; Zhang F; He F; Zhang L; Guo C; Zhao S; Yang G Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Jul; 110(1):e5-12. PubMed ID: 20610295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hydroxyapatite and collagen combination-coated dental implants display better bone formation in the peri-implant area than the same combination plus bone morphogenetic protein-2-coated implants, hydroxyapatite only coated implants, and uncoated implants. Lee SW; Hahn BD; Kang TY; Lee MJ; Choi JY; Kim MK; Kim SG J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Jan; 72(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 24331565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The bone response of oxidized bioactive and non-bioactive titanium implants. Sul YT; Johansson C; Byon E; Albrektsson T Biomaterials; 2005 Nov; 26(33):6720-30. PubMed ID: 15975649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of biomimetically and electrochemically deposited nano-hydroxyapatite coatings on osseointegration of porous titanium implants. Yang GL; He FM; Hu JA; Wang XX; Zhao SF Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jun; 107(6):782-9. PubMed ID: 19201624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bone responses to titanium implants surface-roughened by sandblasted and double etched treatments in a rabbit model. Yang GL; He FM; Yang XF; Wang XX; Zhao SF Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Oct; 106(4):516-24. PubMed ID: 18602288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Enhanced bone healing around nanohydroxyapatite-coated polyetheretherketone implants: An experimental study in rabbit bone. Barkarmo S; Andersson M; Currie F; Kjellin P; Jimbo R; Johansson CB; Stenport V J Biomater Appl; 2014 Nov; 29(5):737-47. PubMed ID: 25015653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of ion beam-assisted deposition of hydroxyapatite on the osseointegration of endosseous implants in rabbit tibiae. Jung YC; Han CH; Lee IS; Kim HE Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(6):809-18. PubMed ID: 11769831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vivo study of the effect of RGD treatment on bone ongrowth on press-fit titanium alloy implants. Elmengaard B; Bechtold JE; Søballe K Biomaterials; 2005 Jun; 26(17):3521-6. PubMed ID: 15621242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]