These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Consider the source. Mason DJ Am J Nurs; 2009 Apr; 109(4):7. PubMed ID: 19325281 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. On cloning research, peer review and the possibility of fraud. CarriĆ³ I Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2006 Mar; 33(3):235-6. PubMed ID: 16477432 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Being critical and constructive: a guide to peer reviewing for librarians. Akers KG J Med Libr Assoc; 2017 Jan; 105(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 28096739 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Medical journals and the science of peer review: raising the standard. Callaham ML; Waeckerle JF Ann Emerg Med; 1996 Jul; 28(1):75-7. PubMed ID: 8669742 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. On peer review. Schuklenk U Bioethics; 2015 Feb; 29(2):ii-iii. PubMed ID: 25586285 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Publish or perish: easier said than done. Tintinalli J Emerg Med (Fremantle); 2001 Dec; 13(4):407-8. PubMed ID: 11903424 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Peer review: recognition via year-end statements. van Loon AJ Nature; 2003 May; 423(6936):116. PubMed ID: 12736656 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [On rejection of papers submitted for publication]. Bicas HE Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2005; 68(3):283-4. PubMed ID: 16059554 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [How to reward and stimulate the task of reviewing scientific articles?]. Muccioli C; Campos M; Goldchmit M; Dantas PE; Bechara SJ; Costa VP Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2007; 70(1):5. PubMed ID: 17505710 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. When the blind lead the blind: In the pit of peer review. Rossdale PD Equine Vet J; 2010 May; 42(4):283. PubMed ID: 20525041 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]