These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1849180)

  • 1. Robustness of maximum likelihood tree estimation against different patterns of base substitutions.
    Fukami-Kobayashi K; Tateno Y
    J Mol Evol; 1991 Jan; 32(1):79-91. PubMed ID: 1849180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of models for nucleotide substitution used in maximum-likelihood phylogenetic estimation.
    Yang Z; Goldman N; Friday A
    Mol Biol Evol; 1994 Mar; 11(2):316-24. PubMed ID: 8170371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony and likelihood methods.
    Yang Z
    J Mol Evol; 1996 Feb; 42(2):294-307. PubMed ID: 8919881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relative efficiencies of the maximum-likelihood, neighbor-joining, and maximum-parsimony methods when substitution rate varies with site.
    Tateno Y; Takezaki N; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1994 Mar; 11(2):261-77. PubMed ID: 8170367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Unbiased estimation of evolutionary distance between nucleotide sequences.
    Tajima F
    Mol Biol Evol; 1993 May; 10(3):677-88. PubMed ID: 8336549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data. II. Gene frequency data.
    Nei M; Tajima F; Tateno Y
    J Mol Evol; 1983; 19(2):153-70. PubMed ID: 6571220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Theoretical foundation to estimate the relative efficiencies of the Jukes-Cantor+gamma model and the Jukes-Cantor model in obtaining the correct phylogenetic tree.
    Som A
    Gene; 2006 Dec; 385():103-10. PubMed ID: 16979305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nonrandom amino acid substitution and estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in evolution.
    Nei M; Tateno Y
    J Mol Evol; 1978 Oct; 11(4):333-47. PubMed ID: 722807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Linear invariants under Jukes' and Cantor's one-parameter model.
    Fu YX
    J Theor Biol; 1995 Apr; 173(4):339-52. PubMed ID: 7783448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. When is it safe to use an oversimplified substitution model in tree-making?
    Rzhetsky A; Sitnikova T
    Mol Biol Evol; 1996 Nov; 13(9):1255-65. PubMed ID: 8896378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data. I. Distantly related species.
    Tateno Y; Nei M; Tajima F
    J Mol Evol; 1982; 18(6):387-404. PubMed ID: 7175956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimation of average number of nucleotide substitutions when the rate of substitution varies with nucleotide.
    Gojobori T; Ishii K; Nei M
    J Mol Evol; 1982; 18(6):414-23. PubMed ID: 7175958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bayesian coestimation of phylogeny and sequence alignment.
    Lunter G; Miklós I; Drummond A; Jensen JL; Hein J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Apr; 6():83. PubMed ID: 15804354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Maximum likelihood estimates of species trees: how accuracy of phylogenetic inference depends upon the divergence history and sampling design.
    McCormack JE; Huang H; Knowles LL
    Syst Biol; 2009 Oct; 58(5):501-8. PubMed ID: 20525604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evolutionary distances between nucleotide sequences based on the distribution of substitution rates among sites as estimated by parsimony.
    Tourasse NJ; Gouy M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1997 Mar; 14(3):287-98. PubMed ID: 9066796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The gene tree delusion.
    Springer MS; Gatesy J
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2016 Jan; 94(Pt A):1-33. PubMed ID: 26238460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relative efficiencies of the maximum parsimony and distance-matrix methods in obtaining the correct phylogenetic tree.
    Sourdis J; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1988 May; 5(3):298-311. PubMed ID: 3386530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nucleotide substitution models and estimation of phylogeny.
    Håstad O; Björklund M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1998 Nov; 15(11):1381-9. PubMed ID: 12572602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Large sample approximations of probabilities of correct evolutionary tree estimation and biases of maximum likelihood estimation.
    Susko E
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2011; 10():Article 10. PubMed ID: 21381435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimation of evolutionary distance for reconstructing molecular phylogenetic trees.
    Tajima F; Takezaki N
    Mol Biol Evol; 1994 Mar; 11(2):278-86. PubMed ID: 8170368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.