312 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18492879)
1. 18F-FDG PET of common enhancing malignant brain tumors.
Kosaka N; Tsuchida T; Uematsu H; Kimura H; Okazawa H; Itoh H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jun; 190(6):W365-9. PubMed ID: 18492879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Role of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography scan in differentiating enhancing brain tumors.
Das K; Mittal BR; Vasistha RK; Singh P; Mathuriya SN
Indian J Nucl Med; 2011 Oct; 26(4):171-6. PubMed ID: 23559710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. 18F-FDOPA PET imaging of brain tumors: comparison study with 18F-FDG PET and evaluation of diagnostic accuracy.
Chen W; Silverman DH; Delaloye S; Czernin J; Kamdar N; Pope W; Satyamurthy N; Schiepers C; Cloughesy T
J Nucl Med; 2006 Jun; 47(6):904-11. PubMed ID: 16741298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. 18F-FDG PET of gliomas at delayed intervals: improved distinction between tumor and normal gray matter.
Spence AM; Muzi M; Mankoff DA; O'Sullivan SF; Link JM; Lewellen TK; Lewellen B; Pham P; Minoshima S; Swanson K; Krohn KA
J Nucl Med; 2004 Oct; 45(10):1653-9. PubMed ID: 15471829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Adrenal masses in patients with cancer: PET/CT characterization with combined CT histogram and standardized uptake value PET analysis.
Perri M; Erba P; Volterrani D; Guidoccio F; Lazzeri E; Caramella D; Mariani G
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Jul; 197(1):209-16. PubMed ID: 21701032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical implications of different image reconstruction parameters for interpretation of whole-body PET studies in cancer patients.
Schöder H; Erdi YE; Chao K; Gonen M; Larson SM; Yeung HW
J Nucl Med; 2004 Apr; 45(4):559-66. PubMed ID: 15073250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reliability of semiquantitative ¹⁸F-FDG PET parameters derived from simultaneous brain PET/MRI: a feasibility study.
Jena A; Taneja S; Goel R; Renjen P; Negi P
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Jul; 83(7):1269-1274. PubMed ID: 24813529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Imaging proliferation in brain tumors with 18F-FLT PET: comparison with 18F-FDG.
Chen W; Cloughesy T; Kamdar N; Satyamurthy N; Bergsneider M; Liau L; Mischel P; Czernin J; Phelps ME; Silverman DH
J Nucl Med; 2005 Jun; 46(6):945-52. PubMed ID: 15937304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of PET for diagnosis of solid pulmonary lesions with 18F-FDG uptake below the standardized uptake value of 2.5.
Hashimoto Y; Tsujikawa T; Kondo C; Maki M; Momose M; Nagai A; Ohnuki T; Nishikawa T; Kusakabe K
J Nucl Med; 2006 Mar; 47(3):426-31. PubMed ID: 16513611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Can the standardized uptake value characterize primary brain tumors on FDG-PET?
Hustinx R; Smith RJ; Benard F; Bhatnagar A; Alavi A
Eur J Nucl Med; 1999 Nov; 26(11):1501-9. PubMed ID: 10552096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. FDG-PET and CT characterization of adrenal lesions in cancer patients.
Jana S; Zhang T; Milstein DM; Isasi CR; Blaufox MD
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2006 Jan; 33(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 16193311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantitative studies using positron emission tomography (PET) for the diagnosis and therapy planning of oncological patients.
Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A; Strauss L
Hell J Nucl Med; 2006; 9(1):10-21. PubMed ID: 16617388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Differentiating radiation necrosis from tumor recurrence in high-grade gliomas: assessing the efficacy of 18F-FDG PET, 11C-methionine PET and perfusion MRI.
Kim YH; Oh SW; Lim YJ; Park CK; Lee SH; Kang KW; Jung HW; Chang KH
Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2010 Nov; 112(9):758-65. PubMed ID: 20619531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Analysis of 18F-FET PET for grading of recurrent gliomas: is evaluation of uptake kinetics superior to standard methods?
Pöpperl G; Kreth FW; Herms J; Koch W; Mehrkens JH; Gildehaus FJ; Kretzschmar HA; Tonn JC; Tatsch K
J Nucl Med; 2006 Mar; 47(3):393-403. PubMed ID: 16513607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Adrenal nodules at FDG PET/CT in patients known to have or suspected of having lung cancer: a proposal for an efficient diagnostic algorithm.
Brady MJ; Thomas J; Wong TZ; Franklin KM; Ho LM; Paulson EK
Radiology; 2009 Feb; 250(2):523-30. PubMed ID: 19188319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The use of 18F-FDG PET ratios in the differential diagnosis of common malignant brain tumors.
Meric K; Killeen RP; Abi-Ghanem AS; Soliman F; Novruzov F; Cakan E; Cayci Z
Clin Imaging; 2015; 39(6):970-4. PubMed ID: 26259864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of effects of 18F-FDG PET-CT and MRI in identifying and grading gliomas.
Song PJ; Lu QY; Li MY; Li X; Shen F
J Biol Regul Homeost Agents; 2016; 30(3):833-838. PubMed ID: 27655507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optimization of semi-quantification in metabolic PET studies with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose and 11C-methionine in the determination of malignancy of gliomas.
Borbély K; Nyáry I; Tóth M; Ericson K; Gulyás B
J Neurol Sci; 2006 Jul; 246(1-2):85-94. PubMed ID: 16603193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dual-time-point 18F-FDG PET/CT versus dynamic breast MRI of suspicious breast lesions.
Imbriaco M; Caprio MG; Limite G; Pace L; De Falco T; Capuano E; Salvatore M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Nov; 191(5):1323-30. PubMed ID: 18941064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Grading of brain glioma with 1-11C-acetate PET: comparison with 18F-FDG PET.
Tsuchida T; Takeuchi H; Okazawa H; Tsujikawa T; Fujibayashi Y
Nucl Med Biol; 2008 Feb; 35(2):171-6. PubMed ID: 18312826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
