105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18492919)
1. MDCT of the breast.
Perrone A; Lo Mele L; Sassi S; Marini M; Testaverde L; Izzo L; Marini M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jun; 190(6):1644-51. PubMed ID: 18492919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dynamic multidetector CT of breast tumors: diagnostic features and comparison with conventional techniques.
Inoue M; Sano T; Watai R; Ashikaga R; Ueda K; Watatani M; Nishimura Y
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Sep; 181(3):679-86. PubMed ID: 12933459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Benign or malignant?: differentiating breast lesions with computed tomography attenuation values on dynamic computed tomography mammography.
Miyake K; Hayakawa K; Nishino M; Nakamura Y; Morimoto T; Urata Y; Ueda H; Tanikake M; Kanao S; Shiozaki T; Yamamoto A
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2005; 29(6):772-9. PubMed ID: 16272850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Contrast-enhanced MR mammography for evaluation of the contralateral breast in patients with diagnosed unilateral breast cancer or high-risk lesions.
Pediconi F; Catalano C; Roselli A; Padula S; Altomari F; Moriconi E; Pronio AM; Kirchin MA; Passariello R
Radiology; 2007 Jun; 243(3):670-80. PubMed ID: 17446524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Value of contrast-enhanced power Doppler sonography using a microbubble echo-enhancing agent in evaluation of small breast lesions.
Kook SH; Kwag HJ
J Clin Ultrasound; 2003 Jun; 31(5):227-38. PubMed ID: 12767017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Do mammography, sonography, and MR mammography have a diagnostic benefit compared with mammography and sonography?
Müller-Schimpfle M; Stoll P; Stern W; Kurz S; Dammann F; Claussen CD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 May; 168(5):1323-9. PubMed ID: 9129436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Breast multidetector-row CT with histopathologic correlation].
Takeuchi M; Yamashita A; Ohgi K; Kobori K; Furukawa T
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 2004 Nov; 64(8):557-63. PubMed ID: 15651361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of ultrasound elastography, mammography, and sonography in the diagnosis of solid breast lesions.
Zhi H; Ou B; Luo BM; Feng X; Wen YL; Yang HY
J Ultrasound Med; 2007 Jun; 26(6):807-15. PubMed ID: 17526612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging, multidetector row computed tomography, ultrasonography, and mammography for tumor extension of breast cancer.
Uematsu T; Yuen S; Kasami M; Uchida Y
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2008 Dec; 112(3):461-74. PubMed ID: 18193352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Value of dual-time-point (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose integrated positron emission and computed tomography in differentiation of malignant from benign gastrointestinal diseases].
Xu XX; Cheng J; Xu WG; Dai D; Song XY; Ma WC; Zhu L; Zhu X
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2012 May; 34(5):364-8. PubMed ID: 22883458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Breast lesion detection and characterization at contrast-enhanced MR mammography: gadobenate dimeglumine versus gadopentetate dimeglumine.
Pediconi F; Catalano C; Occhiato R; Venditti F; Fraioli F; Napoli A; Kirchin MA; Passariello R
Radiology; 2005 Oct; 237(1):45-56. PubMed ID: 16126926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Is breast MRI helpful in the evaluation of inconclusive mammographic findings?
Moy L; Elias K; Patel V; Lee J; Babb JS; Toth HK; Mercado CL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Oct; 193(4):986-93. PubMed ID: 19770320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Automated mammary sonography and mammography: the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions].
Richter K; Hamm B; Heywang-Köbrunner SH; Fobbe F; Prihoda H; Schmitt KJ; Frohberg HD; Winzer KJ; Aldinger HU; Guski H; Döinghaus K; Löhr G
Rofo; 1998 Sep; 169(3):245-52. PubMed ID: 9779063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intramammary incidental findings on staging computer tomography.
Surov A; Fiedler E; Wienke A; Holzhausen HJ; Spielmann RP; Behrmann C
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81(9):2174-8. PubMed ID: 21742452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ultrasonography as adjunct to mammography in the evaluation of breast tumors.
Skaane P
Acta Radiol Suppl; 1999; 420():1-47. PubMed ID: 10693544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The challenge of imaging dense breast parenchyma: is magnetic resonance mammography the technique of choice? A comparative study with x-ray mammography and whole-breast ultrasound.
Pediconi F; Catalano C; Roselli A; Dominelli V; Cagioli S; Karatasiou A; Pronio A; Kirchin MA; Passariello R
Invest Radiol; 2009 Jul; 44(7):412-21. PubMed ID: 19448554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in screening detected microcalcification lesions of the breast: is there any value?
Uematsu T; Yuen S; Kasami M; Uchida Y
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Jul; 103(3):269-81. PubMed ID: 17063274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Detection of primary breast carcinoma with a dedicated, large-field-of-view FDG PET mammography device: initial experience.
Rosen EL; Turkington TG; Soo MS; Baker JA; Coleman RE
Radiology; 2005 Feb; 234(2):527-34. PubMed ID: 15671006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prediction of the usefulness of combined mammography and scintimammography in suspected primary breast cancer using ROC curves.
Buscombe JR; Cwikla JB; Holloway B; Hilson AJ
J Nucl Med; 2001 Jan; 42(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 11197976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dual-time-point 18F-FDG PET/CT versus dynamic breast MRI of suspicious breast lesions.
Imbriaco M; Caprio MG; Limite G; Pace L; De Falco T; Capuano E; Salvatore M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Nov; 191(5):1323-30. PubMed ID: 18941064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
