80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1849300)
1. [The value of CT and MRT in assessing aortocoronary venous bypasses in comparison with coronary angiography].
Wicke K; Mühlberger V; Judmaier W; Moes N; zur Nedden D
Rofo; 1991 Mar; 154(3):306-9. PubMed ID: 1849300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predictive value of computed tomographic determination of the patency rate of aortocoronary venous bypasses in relation to angiographic results.
Mühlberger V; Knapp E; zur Nedden D
Eur Heart J; 1990 May; 11(5):380-8. PubMed ID: 2191862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Significance of electron-beam tomography in the evaluation of the patency of aortocoronary bypasses].
Knez A; Haberl R; Becker C; Becker A; Engelmann M; Brüning R; Reiser M; Steinbeck G
Radiologe; 1998 Dec; 38(12):1012-20. PubMed ID: 9931976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Comparison between angiographic and computed tomographic imaging of aortocoronary bypasses in 100 patients].
Mühlberger V; Knapp E; zur Nedden D; Braunsteiner H
Rofo; 1985 Apr; 142(4):406-10. PubMed ID: 2986217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Diagnosis of the aortocoronary bypass--a comparison of MRT and CT].
Sandring KH; Lüning M; Förster A; Müller C
Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1990; 31(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 2343087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Computed tomography angiography of coronary artery bypass grafts: robustness in emergency and clinical routine settings.
Heye T; Kauczor HU; Szabo G; Hosch W
Acta Radiol; 2014 Mar; 55(2):161-70. PubMed ID: 23908242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Patency of coronary bypass grafts: assessment with breath-hold contrast-enhanced MR angiography--value of a non-electrocardiographically triggered technique.
Wintersperger BJ; Engelmann MG; von Smekal A; Knez A; Penzkofer HV; Höfling B; Laub G; Reiser MF
Radiology; 1998 Aug; 208(2):345-51. PubMed ID: 9680557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [The value of spiral computed tomography in the imaging of aortocoronary bypass vessels].
Steiner P; Phillips F; Stiel G; Schuchert A; Rust C; Hauger B; Bücheler E
Rofo; 1994 Jan; 160(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 8305687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Imaging of aortocoronary bypasses with intravenous digital subtraction angiography].
Sievert H; Rauber K; Kunkel B; Schork A; Satter P; Riemann H; Kaltenbach M; Kober G
Z Kardiol; 1987 Dec; 76(12):733-6. PubMed ID: 3326312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [The value of nuclear magnetic resonance tomography in evaluating the patency of aortocoronary bypass grafts].
Knoll P; Bonatti G; Pitscheider W; Psenner K; Erlicher A; Zammarchi A; Crepaz R
Z Kardiol; 1994 Jun; 83(6):439-45. PubMed ID: 8067046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Evaluation of coronary artery graft patency by computed tomography. Comparison with coronary arteriography (author's transl)].
Mühlberger V; zur Nedden D; Knapp E; Unger F; Scharfetter H; Braunsteiner H
Z Kardiol; 1981 May; 70(5):377-9. PubMed ID: 6973900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Multi-slice CT of aortocoronary venous bypasses and mammary artery bypasses: evaluation of bypasses and their anastomoses].
Fröhner S; Wagner M; Schmitt R; Brunn J; Müller M; Christopoulos G; Coblenz G; Kerber S; Urbanski P
Rontgenpraxis; 2002; 54(5):163-73. PubMed ID: 12051077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Detection of coronary artery bypass graft patency as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging.
Jenkins JP; Love HG; Foster CJ; Isherwood I; Rowlands DJ
Br J Radiol; 1988 Jan; 61(721):2-4. PubMed ID: 3258170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Value of navigator echo magnetic resonance angiography in detecting occlusion/patency of arterial and venous, single and sequential coronary bypass grafts.
Molinari G; Sardanelli F; Zandrino F; Balbi M; Masperone MA
Int J Card Imaging; 2000 Jun; 16(3):149-60. PubMed ID: 11144768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting of the left internal thoracic artery by means of magnetic resonance imaging.
Stauder NI; Fenchel M; Stauder H; Küttner A; Scheule AM; Kramer U; Claussen CD; Miller S
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Mar; 129(3):607-14. PubMed ID: 15746745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of coronary artery bypass grafts: value of different breath-hold MR imaging techniques.
Kalden P; Kreitner KF; Wittlinger T; Voigtländer T; Krummenauer F; Kestel J; Thelen M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 May; 172(5):1359-64. PubMed ID: 10227517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Non-selective digital subtraction angiography of aortocoronary bypasses].
Harder T; Steudel A; Mohr F; Schüller J
Rofo; 1991 Jan; 154(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 1846686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [A comparison of ultrafast computed tomography, magnetic resonance angiography and selective angiography for the detection of coronary bypass patency].
von Smekal A; Knez A; Seelos KC; Haberl R; Spiegl F; Reichart B; Steinbeck G; Reiser M
Rofo; 1997 Mar; 166(3):185-91. PubMed ID: 9156587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Noninvasive assessment of aortocoronary bypass using magnetic resonance tomography].
Theissen P; Sechtem U; Langkamp S; Jungehülsing M; Hilger HH; Schicha H
Nuklearmedizin; 1989 Dec; 28(6):234-42. PubMed ID: 2608447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Coronary arteries and coronary artery bypass in CT: options, limitations and perspectives].
Steiner P
Aktuelle Radiol; 1995 Sep; 5(5):283-9. PubMed ID: 7495888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
