80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1849300)
21. [Late results of coronary heart surgery. Late graft patency in coronary bypass procedure].
Kito Y; Fujita T; Ohara T; Kosakai Y; Kawazoe K; Hayashi K; Ego Y; Fujii H; Kozuka T; Naito H
Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1983 Sep; 84(9):851-4. PubMed ID: 6610101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Noninvasive evaluation of aortocoronary bypass graft patency with tomodensitometry and exercise myocardial scintigraphy].
Usdin JP; Vasile N; Cinotti L; Meignan M; Legendre T; Larde P; Szwarc G; Vernant P
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1983 Feb; 76(2):183-92. PubMed ID: 6407426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Value and limitations of computed tomography in assessing aortocoronary bypass graft patency.
Daniel WG; Döhring W; Stender HS; Lichtlen PR
Circulation; 1983 May; 67(5):983-7. PubMed ID: 6600986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Diameter changes of occluded venous coronary artery bypass grafts in electron beam tomography: preliminary findings.
Enzweiler CN; Wiese TH; Petersein J; Lembcke AE; Borges AC; Dohmen P; Hoffmann U; Hamm B
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2003 Mar; 23(3):347-53. PubMed ID: 12614805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Quantitative computed tomographic flow measurements of aortocoronary venous bypass grafts. II. Correlation with angiographic measurements].
Mühlberger V; Moes N; zur Nedden D; Knapp E
Rofo; 1989 Sep; 151(3):278-83. PubMed ID: 2552518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Coronary artery bypass graft patency: noninvasive evaluation with MR imaging.
White RD; Caputo GR; Mark AS; Modin GW; Higgins CB
Radiology; 1987 Sep; 164(3):681-6. PubMed ID: 3497409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [2D-phase contrast flow evaluation and contrast-enhanced MR angiography for perioperative assessment of internal mammary artery grafts].
Stauder NI; Miller S; Scheule AM; Brechtel K; Eckstein FS; Hahn U; Kramer U; Duda SH; Claussen CD
Rofo; 2001 Sep; 173(9):790-7. PubMed ID: 11582557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Magnetic resonance assessment of coronary artery bypass grafts.
Molinari G; Sardanelli F; Zandrino F; Balzan C; Masperone MA
Rays; 1999; 24(1):131-9. PubMed ID: 10358390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Clinical value of coronary bypass graft evaluation with CT.
Godwin JD; Califf RM; Korobkin M; Moore AV; Breiman RS; Kong Y
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1983 Apr; 140(4):649-55. PubMed ID: 6601365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Magnetic resonance with the spin-echo technic in the noninvasive evaluation of the patency of aortocoronary bypasses: preliminary data].
Knoll P; Bonatti G; Pitscheider W; Psenner K; Erlicher A; Crepaz R; Zammarchi A; Gostner P; Braito E
G Ital Cardiol; 1993 Mar; 23(3):239-46. PubMed ID: 8325459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Evaluation of aortocoronary bypass graft status by computed tomography.
Kahl FR; Wolfman NT; Watts LE
Am J Cardiol; 1981 Aug; 48(2):304-10. PubMed ID: 6973923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Contrast media enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for determining patency of a coronary bypass. A comparison with coronary angiography].
Wintersperger BJ; von Smekal A; Engelmann MG; Knez A; Penzkofer HV; Laub G; Reiser M
Rofo; 1997 Dec; 167(6):572-8. PubMed ID: 9465951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Spiral CT and CT angiography after coronary bypass surgery].
Huppert PE; Salehi-Gilani S; Duda SH; Seboldt H; Claussen CD
Rofo; 1995 Aug; 163(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 7670012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Multislice CT evaluation of coronary artery bypass graft patients.
Gilkeson RC; Markowitz AH
J Thorac Imaging; 2007 Feb; 22(1):56-62. PubMed ID: 17325577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. MR imaging of pseudoaneurysms in aortocoronary bypass graft.
Sherry CS; Harms SE
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1989; 13(3):426-9. PubMed ID: 2786011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for control of minimally invasive coronary artery bypass conduits (MIDCAB/OPCAB).
Boehm DH; Wintersperger BJ; Reichenspurner H; Gulbins H; Detter C; Kur F; Meiser B; Reichart B
Heart Surg Forum; 1999; 2(3):222-5. PubMed ID: 11276479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Evaluating the function of aortocoronary bypasses with magnetic resonance tomography].
Strametz JR; Mayr H; Imhof H; Glogar D
Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1991; 103(17):536-8. PubMed ID: 1949814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Quantitative angiographic follow-up study of the free inferior epigastric coronary bypass graft.
Gurné O; Buche M; Chenu P; Paquay JL; Pelgrim JP; Louagie Y; Marchandise B; Schroeder E
Circulation; 1994 Nov; 90(5 Pt 2):II148-54. PubMed ID: 7955244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Validity of computed tomography for the demonstration of patent or occluded aortocoronary vein grafts. A multicenter study].
Heuser L; Lackner K; Hauser H
Rofo; 1982 Dec; 137(6):619-26. PubMed ID: 6218036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Cine computed tomographic evaluation of aortocoronary bypass graft patency.
Bateman TM; Gray RJ; Whiting JS; Matloff JM; Berman DS; Forrester JS
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1986 Sep; 8(3):693-8. PubMed ID: 3489022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
