BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

484 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18493161)

  • 1. Antibacterial potential of contemporary dental luting cements.
    Daugela P; Oziunas R; Zekonis G
    Stomatologija; 2008; 10(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 18493161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative Evaluation of Antibacterial Effect of Dental Luting Cements on Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus acidophilus: An In vitro Study.
    Feroz S; Bhoyar A; Khan S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Dec; 17(12):973-977. PubMed ID: 27965482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Retention strengths of five luting cements on prefabricated dowels after root canal obturation with a zinc oxide/eugenol sealer: 1. Dowel space preparation/cementation at one week after obturation.
    Hagge MS; Wong RD; Lindemuth JS
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Sep; 11(3):168-75. PubMed ID: 12237797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Antibacterial properties of current orthodontic band cements.
    Vokus RP; Cisneros GJ; Levi M
    Pediatr Dent; 1998; 20(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 9524972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Changes of cement properties caused by mixing errors: the therapeutic range of different cement types.
    Behr M; Rosentritt M; Loher H; Kolbeck C; Trempler C; Stemplinger B; Kopzon V; Handel G
    Dent Mater; 2008 Sep; 24(9):1187-93. PubMed ID: 18372038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Retentiveness of various luting agents used with implant-supported prosthesis: an in vitro study.
    Garg P; Pujari M; Prithviraj DR; Khare S
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Dec; 40(6):649-54. PubMed ID: 25506659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Antibacterial properties of aged dental cements evaluated by direct-contact and agar diffusion tests.
    Lewinstein I; Matalon S; Slutzkey S; Weiss EI
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Apr; 93(4):364-71. PubMed ID: 15798687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Antimicrobial action of dental cements.
    Schwartzman B; Caputo AA; Schein B
    J Prosthet Dent; 1980 Mar; 43(3):309-12. PubMed ID: 6766503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Radiographic appearance of commonly used cements in implant dentistry.
    Pette GA; Ganeles J; Norkin FJ
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2013; 33(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 23342348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Antibacterial properties of eight dental cements.
    Coogan MM; Creaven PJ
    Int Endod J; 1993 Nov; 26(6):355-61. PubMed ID: 8144245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Retentiveness of various luting agents used with implant-supported prostheses: a preliminary in vitro study.
    Garg P; Gupta G; Prithviraj DR; Pujari M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2013; 26(1):82-4. PubMed ID: 23342339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Antibacterial activity, surface roughness, flexural strength, and solubility of conventional luting cements containing chlorhexidine diacetate/cetrimide mixtures.
    Korkmaz FM; Tüzüner T; Baygin O; Buruk CK; Durkan R; Bagis B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Aug; 110(2):107-15. PubMed ID: 23929372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bond strength of luting cements to core foundation materials.
    Hewlett S; Wadenya RO; Mante FK
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2010 Mar; 31(2):140-6. PubMed ID: 20344899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of luting agents on the retention and marginal adaptation of the CeraOne implant system.
    Clayton GH; Driscoll CF; Hondrum SO
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(5):660-5. PubMed ID: 9337028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dental cements: an update.
    Jones DW
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1998 Sep; 64(8):569-70. PubMed ID: 9785686
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of luting agents and stiffness of implant-abutments on marginal adaptation, chipping, and fracture resistance of zirconia crowns.
    Schäfer L; Winkler C; Brandl G; Eckl S; Preis V; Behr M
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2014 Nov; 39():279-91. PubMed ID: 25168974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Retention of implant-supported zirconium oxide ceramic restorations using different luting agents.
    Nejatidanesh F; Savabi O; Shahtoosi M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24 Suppl A100():20-4. PubMed ID: 22092303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An in vitro radiographic analysis of the density of dental luting cements as measured by CCD-based digital radiography.
    Antonijevic D; Jevremovic D; Jovanovic S; Obradovic-Djuricic K
    Quintessence Int; 2012 May; 43(5):421-8. PubMed ID: 22536594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development of a new temporary luting agent consisting of PEMA and eugenol--residue ratio and bond strength of luting cements for abutment materials.
    Okada H; Ishida Y; Noguchi H; Ryukata I; Nagayama K
    Dent Mater J; 2009 May; 28(3):261-6. PubMed ID: 19662723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of evaporation on the properties of water-based dental luting agents.
    Hondrum SO
    Gen Dent; 2000; 48(3):286-90; quiz 291-2. PubMed ID: 11199594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.