712 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18493164)
1. Observer performance based on marginal bone tissue visibility in Scanora panoramic radiography and posterior bitewing radiography.
Ivanauskaite D; Lindh C; Rohlin M
Stomatologija; 2008; 10(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 18493164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison between Scanora panoramic radiography and bitewing radiography in the assessment of marginal bone tissue.
Ivanauskaite D; Lindh C; Rangne K; Rohlin M
Stomatologija; 2006; 8(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 16687909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reliability of marginal bone level measurements on digital panoramic and digital intraoral radiographs.
Hellén-Halme K; Lith A; Shi XQ
Oral Radiol; 2020 Apr; 36(2):135-140. PubMed ID: 31004276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Panoramic radiography in the assessment of the marginal bone level.
Akesson L
Swed Dent J Suppl; 1991; 78():1-129. PubMed ID: 1896925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Agreement between panoramic and intra-oral radiography in the assessment of marginal bone height.
Molander B; Ahlqwist M; Gröndahl HG; Hollender L
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1991 Aug; 20(3):155-60. PubMed ID: 1808000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of trabecular pattern on periapical and panoramic radiographs: a pilot study.
Pham D; Jonasson G; Kiliaridis S
Acta Odontol Scand; 2010 Mar; 68(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 20085501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of bitewing, periapical, unfiltered and filtered digital panoramic images for approximal caries detection in posterior teeth.
Akarslan ZZ; Akdevelioğlu M; Güngör K; Erten H
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Dec; 37(8):458-63. PubMed ID: 19033431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparative diagnostic assessment of anterior tooth and bone status using panoramic and periapical radiography.
Le T; Nassery K; Kahlert B; Heithersay G
Aust Orthod J; 2011 Nov; 27(2):162-8. PubMed ID: 22372273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of panoramic and intraoral radiography and pocket probing for the measurement of the marginal bone level.
Akesson L; Håkansson J; Rohlin M
J Clin Periodontol; 1992 May; 19(5):326-32. PubMed ID: 1517478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of clinician agreement during visualization of conventional and digitized bitewing radiographs.
Kimmes NS; Saini TS; Carroll LR
Gen Dent; 2006; 54(3):182-5. PubMed ID: 16776410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of intraoral radiography and cone-beam computed tomography for the detection of periodontal defects: an in vitro study.
Bagis N; Kolsuz ME; Kursun S; Orhan K
BMC Oral Health; 2015 May; 15():64. PubMed ID: 26016804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Radiographic assessment of the marginal bone level after implant treatment: a comparison of periapical and Scanora detailed narrow beam radiography.
Lofthag-Hansen S; Lindh C; Petersson A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Mar; 32(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 12775663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the reproducibility of storage phosphor and film bitewings for assessment of alveolar bone loss.
Henriksson CH; Stermer EM; Aass AM; Sandvik L; Møystad A
Acta Odontol Scand; 2008; 66(6):380-4. PubMed ID: 18932094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Panoramic radiography in dental diagnostics.
Molander B
Swed Dent J Suppl; 1996; 119():1-26. PubMed ID: 8971997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An evaluation of image quality for the assessment of the marginal bone level in panoramic radiography. A comparison of radiographs from different dental clinics.
Akesson L; Håkansson J; Rohlin M; Zöger B
Swed Dent J; 1993; 17(1-2):9-21. PubMed ID: 8362363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Marginal bone in periodontal disease: an evaluation of image quality in panoramic and intra-oral radiography.
Akesson L; Rohlin M; Håkansson J
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1989 Aug; 18(3):105-12. PubMed ID: 2637876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detection of bone loss with different X-ray techniques in periodontal patients.
Kim TS; Obst C; Zehaczek S; Geenen C
J Periodontol; 2008 Jul; 79(7):1141-9. PubMed ID: 18597595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Periodontal disease morbidity quantification. II. Validation of alveolar bone loss measurements and vertical defect diagnosis from digital bite-wing images.
Hildebolt CF; Vannier MW; Shrout MK; Pilgram TK; Province M; Vahey EP; Rietz DW
J Periodontol; 1990 Oct; 61(10):623-32. PubMed ID: 2231229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of radiographic bone height assessments in panoramic and intraoral radiographs of implant patients.
Kullman L; Al-Asfour A; Zetterqvist L; Andersson L
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(1):96-100. PubMed ID: 17340902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison between subtraction radiography and conventional radiographic interpretation during long-term evaluation of periodontal therapy in Class II furcation defects.
Cury PR; Araujo NS; Bowie J; Sallum EA; Jeffcoat MK
J Periodontol; 2004 Aug; 75(8):1145-9. PubMed ID: 15455744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
