154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18493638)
21. Peer-review system could gain from author feedback.
Korngreen A
Nature; 2005 Nov; 438(7066):282. PubMed ID: 16292281
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Peer-review: a citadel under siege.
Apuzzo ML
Neurosurgery; 2008 Nov; 63(5):821. PubMed ID: 19005370
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Rethink on review leaves researchers out in the cold.
Brumfiel G
Nature; 2005 May; 435(7038):5. PubMed ID: 15874982
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. The do's and don't's of submitting scientific papers.
Walsh PJ; Mommsen TP; Nilsson GE
Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol; 2009 Mar; 152(3):203-4. PubMed ID: 19146976
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25.
Welch MD
Mol Biol Cell; 2020 Jan; 31(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 31887068
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Mentors of tomorrow.
Nature; 2007 Jun; 447(7146):754. PubMed ID: 17568705
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Discourse among referees and editors would help.
Lahiri DK
Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7078):784. PubMed ID: 16482130
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Academics seek to cast peer review as a public service.
Butler D
Nature; 2004 Jul; 430(6995):7. PubMed ID: 15229573
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Future of open access could be online and peer-reviewed.
Sandal M
Nature; 2008 Jul; 454(7201):158. PubMed ID: 18615058
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Does peer review at the US National Institutes of Health need modifying?
Reprod Biomed Online; 2008 Mar; 16(3):390. PubMed ID: 18339262
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Supporting the future.
Nature; 2008 Jun; 453(7198):958. PubMed ID: 18563096
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Judging the judges: keeping objectivity in peer review.
Aisen ML
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2002; 39(1):vii-viii. PubMed ID: 11926332
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Editorial. Comments and criticisms.
Frank D; Caldamone A; Mouriquand P
J Pediatr Urol; 2009 Aug; 5(4):253. PubMed ID: 19596115
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Peer review at National Institutes of Health: small steps forward.
Johnston SC; Hauser SL
Ann Neurol; 2008 Nov; 64(5):A15-7. PubMed ID: 19067350
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Double-blind review: easy to guess in specialist fields.
Lane D
Nature; 2008 Mar; 452(7183):28. PubMed ID: 18322503
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Evidence & Methods: a new addition to The Spine Journal.
Weiner BK
Spine J; 2009 Jun; 9(6):433. PubMed ID: 19364679
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. We need more insight into what's worth paying for.
Gunn W
Nature; 2009 Mar; 458(7236):281. PubMed ID: 19295585
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Funding: the research revolution.
Brumfiel G
Nature; 2008 Jun; 453(7198):975-6. PubMed ID: 18563124
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Brain imaging skewed.
Abbott A
Nature; 2009 Apr; 458(7242):1087. PubMed ID: 19415822
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Chemistry: what chemists want to know.
Ball P
Nature; 2006 Aug; 442(7102):500-2. PubMed ID: 16885957
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
