These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18493638)

  • 41. [From the Cochrane Library: the use of peer review is still under discussion].
    Stijntjes F; Veeken H
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Apr; 152(16):934-7. PubMed ID: 18561790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. New developments in the use of citation analysis in research evaluation.
    Moed HF
    Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz); 2009; 57(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 19219533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Research assessment exercises are necessary - but we need to learn to do them better.
    Nature; 2023 May; 617(7961):437. PubMed ID: 37193816
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Spotlight on "peer-review": the noble foundation of scientific research.
    Bhandari S
    Indian Heart J; 2008; 60(2):159-60. PubMed ID: 19218730
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Investigator balkanization.
    Johnston SC; Hauser SL
    Ann Neurol; 2008 Sep; 64(3):A11-2. PubMed ID: 18825670
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Progress report and a farewell.
    Noseworthy JH
    Neurology; 2009 Jul; 73(1):8-10. PubMed ID: 19564580
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Life begins again at age 126!
    Pietrini P; Ghelarducci B
    Arch Ital Biol; 2008 Mar; 146(1):2p preceding 1. PubMed ID: 18666443
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A peer review how-to.
    Zucker RS
    Science; 2008 Jan; 319(5859):32. PubMed ID: 18174417
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The future for Howard Hughes. Interview by Erika Check Hayden.
    Tjian R
    Nature; 2008 Oct; 455(7214):718. PubMed ID: 18843328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Peer review and the nursing literature.
    Dougherty MC
    Nurs Res; 2009; 58(2):73. PubMed ID: 19289927
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. International peer review improved Irish research rankings.
    O'Carroll C
    Nature; 2009 Aug; 460(7258):949. PubMed ID: 19693064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Recruiters and academia. Academics worry about hiring "undiscovered geniuses".
    Williams WM; Ceci SJ
    Nature; 2005 May; 435(7041):534. PubMed ID: 15917823
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The Neuroscience Peer Review Consortium.
    Saper CB; Maunsell JH;
    Neurosci Lett; 2009 Jun; 457(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 19410133
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Reviewers support blinding in peer review.
    Tierney AJ
    J Adv Nurs; 2008 Oct; 64(2):113. PubMed ID: 18990091
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Neuroendocrinologies membership of the Neuroscience Peer Review Consortium.
    Saper CB; Maunsell JH
    Neuroendocrinology; 2009; 89(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 19176976
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. National Institutes of Health. Changes in peer review target young scientists, heavyweights.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2008 Jun; 320(5882):1404. PubMed ID: 18556519
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The roads not taken.
    Marder E
    Curr Biol; 2008 Sep; 18(17):R725-R726. PubMed ID: 18786366
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Integrating scientific cultures.
    Ideker T; Bafna V; Lemberger T
    Mol Syst Biol; 2007; 3():105. PubMed ID: 17437030
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The Promise and Perils of Peer Review.
    Rohrich RJ
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Nov; 148(5S):43S-45S. PubMed ID: 34699488
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Coordinates and peer review.
    Nat Struct Biol; 2003 Aug; 10(8):579. PubMed ID: 12886286
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.