These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

67 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18494115)

  • 1. Evidence of an internecine conflict within the practice of environmental risk assessment?
    Bridges TS; Glaser D
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2008 Apr; 4(2):138. PubMed ID: 18494115
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Better environmental decision making - recent progress and future trends.
    Pollard SJ; Davies GJ; Coley F; Lemon M
    Sci Total Environ; 2008 Aug; 400(1-3):20-31. PubMed ID: 18774589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Uses and misuses of multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) in environmental decision making.
    Steele K; Carmel Y; Cross J; Wilcox C
    Risk Anal; 2009 Jan; 29(1):26-33. PubMed ID: 18826413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. And so we model: the ineffective use of mathematical models in ecological risk assessments.
    Tannenbaum LV
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2007 Oct; 3(4):473-5. PubMed ID: 18046795
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Risk perception and communication.
    Greenberg M; Lowrie K
    Risk Anal; 2009 Aug; 29(8):1059-60. PubMed ID: 19659546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Regulatory models and the environment: practice, pitfalls, and prospects.
    Holmes KJ; Graham JA; McKone T; Whipple C
    Risk Anal; 2009 Feb; 29(2):159-70. PubMed ID: 19144069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Policy decision-making under scientific uncertainty: radiological risk assessment and the role of expert advisory groups.
    Mossman KL
    Health Phys; 2009 Aug; 97(2):101-6. PubMed ID: 19590269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. ERP correlates of complex human decision making in a gambling paradigm: detection and resolution of conflict.
    Mennes M; Wouters H; van den Bergh B; Lagae L; Stiers P
    Psychophysiology; 2008 Sep; 45(5):714-20. PubMed ID: 18665870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantitative health impact assessment modelling.
    Brønnum-Hansen H
    Scand J Public Health; 2009 Jul; 37(5):447-9. PubMed ID: 19567551
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Presenting health risk information in different formats: the effect on participants' cognitive and emotional evaluation and decisions.
    Timmermans DR; Ockhuysen-Vermey CF; Henneman L
    Patient Educ Couns; 2008 Dec; 73(3):443-7. PubMed ID: 18722073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Subsea release of oil from a riser: an ecological risk assessment.
    Nazir M; Khan F; Amyotte P; Sadiq R
    Risk Anal; 2008 Oct; 28(5):1173-96. PubMed ID: 18844861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Scientific peer-review processes in setting environmental quality standards in Japan.
    Ikeda S; Uchiyama I
    Risk Anal; 2006 Feb; 26(1):21-3. PubMed ID: 16492175
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Studies on the significance of conflict strength in decision situations].
    Feger H
    Z Exp Angew Psychol; 1968; 15(1):70-87. PubMed ID: 5712607
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perspectives on evidence-based practice from consumers in the US public mental health system.
    Tanenbaum SJ
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):699-706. PubMed ID: 19018898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The strengths of the ecological risk assessment process: linking science to decision making.
    Barnthouse L
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2008 Jul; 4(3):299-305. PubMed ID: 18597567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Including risk in stated-preference economic valuations: Experiments on choices for marine recreation.
    Wielgus J; Gerber LR; Sala E; Bennett J
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Aug; 90(11):3401-9. PubMed ID: 19520490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Good prognosis studies can provide better clinical decisions. Validated risk-/prognosis factors helps the physician].
    Fall K; Holmberg L; Sundström J
    Lakartidningen; 2013 Feb 6-12; 110(6):279-83. PubMed ID: 23469749
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Barriers to clinical risk scores adoption.
    Manfrini O; Bugiardini R
    Eur Heart J; 2007 May; 28(9):1045-6. PubMed ID: 17439990
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Conflict and user involvement in drug misuse treatment decision-making: a qualitative study.
    Fischer J; Neale J; Bloor M; Jenkins N
    Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy; 2008 Oct; 3():21. PubMed ID: 18837989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Decisional conflict in patients and their physicians: a dyadic approach to shared decision making.
    LeBlanc A; Kenny DA; O'Connor AM; Légaré F
    Med Decis Making; 2009; 29(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 19196706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.