BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18495027)

  • 1. The efficacy of 'radio guided occult lesion localization' (ROLL) versus 'wire-guided localization' (WGL) in breast conserving surgery for non-palpable breast cancer: a randomized clinical trial - ROLL study.
    van Esser S; Hobbelink MG; Peeters PH; Buskens E; van der Ploeg IM; Mali WP; Rinkes IH; van Hillegersberg R
    BMC Surg; 2008 May; 8():9. PubMed ID: 18495027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Efficacy of 'radioguided occult lesion localisation' (ROLL) versus 'wire-guided localisation' (WGL) in breast conserving surgery for non-palpable breast cancer: a randomised controlled multicentre trial.
    Postma EL; Verkooijen HM; van Esser S; Hobbelink MG; van der Schelling GP; Koelemij R; Witkamp AJ; Contant C; van Diest PJ; Willems SM; Borel Rinkes IH; van den Bosch MA; Mali WP; van Hillegersberg R;
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2012 Nov; 136(2):469-78. PubMed ID: 23053639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Localization techniques for guided surgical excision of non-palpable breast lesions.
    Chan BK; Wiseberg-Firtell JA; Jois RH; Jensen K; Audisio RA
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Dec; 2015(12):CD009206. PubMed ID: 26718728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost-effectiveness of radioguided occult lesion localization (ROLL) versus wire-guided localization (WGL) in breast conserving surgery for nonpalpable breast cancer: results from a randomized controlled multicenter trial.
    Postma EL; Koffijberg H; Verkooijen HM; Witkamp AJ; van den Bosch MA; van Hillegersberg R
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Jul; 20(7):2219-26. PubMed ID: 23435568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of wire-guided localization (WGL) and radio-guided occult lesion localization (ROLL) in localization of non-palpable breast lesions.
    Elzohery YH; Gomaa MM; Mohamed G; Fadlalla WM; Taha SN; Ibraheem MH
    World J Surg Oncol; 2023 Aug; 21(1):266. PubMed ID: 37626332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of wire-guided and radio-guided occult lesion localization for non-palpable breast lesions: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of current evidence.
    Kiruparan N; Kiruparan P; Debnath D
    Asian J Surg; 2022 Jan; 45(1):79-88. PubMed ID: 34479779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of radioguided occult lesion localization (ROLL) and wire localization for non-palpable breast cancers: a meta-analysis.
    Sajid MS; Parampalli U; Haider Z; Bonomi R
    J Surg Oncol; 2012 Jun; 105(8):852-8. PubMed ID: 22213057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of wire-guided localization and radio-guided occult lesionlocalization in preoperative localization of nonpalpable breast lesions.
    Kanat NB; Tuncel M; Aksoy T; Fırat A; Demirkazık F; Onat D; Çağlar Tuncalı M; Caner BE
    Turk J Med Sci; 2016 Dec; 46(6):1829-1837. PubMed ID: 28081335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Radioactive seed localization is the preferred technique in nonpalpable breast cancer compared with wire-guided localization and radioguided occult lesion localization.
    Theunissen CI; Rust EA; Edens MA; Bandel C; Van't Ooster-van den Berg JG; Jager PL; Noorda EM; Francken AB
    Nucl Med Commun; 2017 May; 38(5):396-401. PubMed ID: 28362718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Applicability of Radioguided Occult Lesion Localization for NonPalpable Benign Breast Lesions, Comparison with Wire Localization, a Clinical Trial.
    Alikhassi A; Saeed F; Abbasi M; Omranipour R; Mahmoodzadeh H; Najafi M; Gity M; Kheradmand A
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2016; 17(7):3185-90. PubMed ID: 27509949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ultrasound-guided breast-sparing surgery to improve cosmetic outcomes and quality of life. A prospective multicentre randomised controlled clinical trial comparing ultrasound-guided surgery to traditional palpation-guided surgery (COBALT trial).
    Krekel NM; Zonderhuis BM; Schreurs HW; Cardozo AM; Rijna H; van der Veen H; Muller S; Poortman P; de Widt L; de Roos WK; Bosch AM; Taets van Amerongen AH; Bergers E; van der Linden MH; de Lange de Klerk ES; Winters HA; Meijer S; van den Tol PM
    BMC Surg; 2011 Mar; 11():8. PubMed ID: 21410949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radioguided occult lesion localization plus sentinel node biopsy (SNOLL) versus wire-guided localization plus sentinel node detection: a case control study of 129 unifocal pure invasive non-palpable breast cancers.
    Giacalone PL; Bourdon A; Trinh PD; Taourel P; Rathat G; Sainmont M; Perocchia H; Rossi M; Rouleau C
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2012 Mar; 38(3):222-9. PubMed ID: 22231127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The use of radioactive iodine-125 seed localization in patients with non-palpable breast cancer: a comparison with the radioguided occult lesion localization with 99m technetium.
    van der Noordaa ME; Pengel KE; Groen E; van Werkhoven E; Rutgers EJ; Loo CE; Vogel W; Vrancken Peeters MJ
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Apr; 41(4):553-8. PubMed ID: 25707349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Radioguided occult lesion localization versus wire-guided localization for non-palpable breast lesions: randomized controlled trial.
    Ocal K; Dag A; Turkmenoglu O; Gunay EC; Yucel E; Duce MN
    Clinics (Sao Paulo); 2011; 66(6):1003-7. PubMed ID: 21808866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Radioguided occult lesion localization (ROLL) versus wire-guided lumpectomy for non-palpable breast lesions: a randomized prospective evaluation.
    Medina-Franco H; Abarca-Pérez L; García-Alvarez MN; Ulloa-Gómez JL; Romero-Trejo C; Sepúlveda-Méndez J
    J Surg Oncol; 2008 Feb; 97(2):108-11. PubMed ID: 18181162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Occult breast lesions: A comparison between radioguided occult lesion localisation (ROLL) vs. wire-guided lumpectomy (WGL).
    Nadeem R; Chagla LS; Harris O; Desmond S; Thind R; Titterrell C; Audisio RA
    Breast; 2005 Aug; 14(4):283-9. PubMed ID: 15985370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sentinel node and occult lesion localization (SNOLL): a systematic review.
    Ahmed M; Douek M
    Breast; 2013 Dec; 22(6):1034-40. PubMed ID: 24135767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Wire and Non-Wire Localisation Techniques in Breast Cancer Surgery: A Review of the Literature with Pooled Analysis.
    Shirazi S; Hajiesmaeili H; Khosla M; Taj S; Sircar T; Vidya R
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2023 Jul; 59(7):. PubMed ID: 37512107
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Systematic review of radioguided surgery for non-palpable breast cancer.
    Lovrics PJ; Cornacchi SD; Vora R; Goldsmith CH; Kahnamoui K
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2011 May; 37(5):388-97. PubMed ID: 21333482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. iROLL: does 3-D radioguided occult lesion localization improve surgical management in early-stage breast cancer?
    Bluemel C; Cramer A; Grossmann C; Kajdi GW; Malzahn U; Lamp N; Langen HJ; Schmid J; Buck AK; Grimminger HJ; Herrmann K
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2015 Oct; 42(11):1692-1699. PubMed ID: 26153146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.