These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18495091)

  • 1. Quantified acoustic-optical speech signal incongruity identifies cortical sites of audiovisual speech processing.
    Bernstein LE; Lu ZL; Jiang J
    Brain Res; 2008 Nov; 1242():172-84. PubMed ID: 18495091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spatiotemporal dynamics of audiovisual speech processing.
    Bernstein LE; Auer ET; Wagner M; Ponton CW
    Neuroimage; 2008 Jan; 39(1):423-35. PubMed ID: 17920933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A neural basis for interindividual differences in the McGurk effect, a multisensory speech illusion.
    Nath AR; Beauchamp MS
    Neuroimage; 2012 Jan; 59(1):781-7. PubMed ID: 21787869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adult dyslexic readers benefit less from visual input during audiovisual speech processing: fMRI evidence.
    Francisco AA; Takashima A; McQueen JM; van den Bunt M; Jesse A; Groen MA
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Aug; 117():454-471. PubMed ID: 29990508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dissociated roles of the inferior frontal gyrus and superior temporal sulcus in audiovisual processing: top-down and bottom-up mismatch detection.
    Uno T; Kawai K; Sakai K; Wakebe T; Ibaraki T; Kunii N; Matsuo T; Saito N
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0122580. PubMed ID: 25822912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Neural processes underlying perceptual enhancement by visual speech gestures.
    Callan DE; Jones JA; Munhall K; Callan AM; Kroos C; Vatikiotis-Bateson E
    Neuroreport; 2003 Dec; 14(17):2213-8. PubMed ID: 14625450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Brain activity during audiovisual speech perception: an fMRI study of the McGurk effect.
    Jones JA; Callan DE
    Neuroreport; 2003 Jun; 14(8):1129-33. PubMed ID: 12821795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electrophysiological evidence for speech-specific audiovisual integration.
    Baart M; Stekelenburg JJ; Vroomen J
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Jan; 53():115-21. PubMed ID: 24291340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Psychophysics of the McGurk and other audiovisual speech integration effects.
    Jiang J; Bernstein LE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Aug; 37(4):1193-209. PubMed ID: 21574741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Degradation of labial information modifies audiovisual speech perception in cochlear-implanted children.
    Huyse A; Berthommier F; Leybaert J
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):110-21. PubMed ID: 23059850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Different neural networks are involved in audiovisual speech perception depending on the context.
    Malfait N; Fonlupt P; Centelles L; Nazarian B; Brown LE; Caclin A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Jul; 26(7):1572-86. PubMed ID: 24392896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sequential audiovisual interactions during speech perception: a whole-head MEG study.
    Hertrich I; Mathiak K; Lutzenberger W; Menning H; Ackermann H
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Mar; 45(6):1342-54. PubMed ID: 17067640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The level of audiovisual print-speech integration deficits in dyslexia.
    Kronschnabel J; Brem S; Maurer U; Brandeis D
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Sep; 62():245-61. PubMed ID: 25084224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Top-down attention regulates the neural expression of audiovisual integration.
    Morís Fernández L; Visser M; Ventura-Campos N; Ávila C; Soto-Faraco S
    Neuroimage; 2015 Oct; 119():272-85. PubMed ID: 26119022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interactions between auditory and visual semantic stimulus classes: evidence for common processing networks for speech and body actions.
    Meyer GF; Greenlee M; Wuerger S
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Sep; 23(9):2291-308. PubMed ID: 20954938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The phase of cortical oscillations determines the perceptual fate of visual cues in naturalistic audiovisual speech.
    Thézé R; Giraud AL; Mégevand P
    Sci Adv; 2020 Nov; 6(45):. PubMed ID: 33148648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Eye Can Hear Clearly Now: Inverse Effectiveness in Natural Audiovisual Speech Processing Relies on Long-Term Crossmodal Temporal Integration.
    Crosse MJ; Di Liberto GM; Lalor EC
    J Neurosci; 2016 Sep; 36(38):9888-95. PubMed ID: 27656026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attentional and linguistic interactions in speech perception.
    Sabri M; Binder JR; Desai R; Medler DA; Leitl MD; Liebenthal E
    Neuroimage; 2008 Feb; 39(3):1444-56. PubMed ID: 17996463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Causal Inference Model Explains Perception of the McGurk Effect and Other Incongruent Audiovisual Speech.
    Magnotti JF; Beauchamp MS
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Feb; 13(2):e1005229. PubMed ID: 28207734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Phonetic versus spatial processes during motor-oriented imitations of visuo-labial and visuo-lingual speech: A functional near-infrared spectroscopy study.
    Zhao T; Hu A; Su R; Lyu C; Wang L; Yan N
    Eur J Neurosci; 2022 Jan; 55(1):154-174. PubMed ID: 34854143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.