These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18496012)

  • 1. A cost comparison of traditional drainage and SUDS in Scotland.
    Duffy A; Jefferies C; Waddell G; Shanks G; Blackwood D; Watkins A
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(9):1451-9. PubMed ID: 18496012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The best management of SuDS treatment trains: a holistic approach.
    Bastien N; Arthur S; Wallis S; Scholz M
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(1):263-72. PubMed ID: 20057113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems (SUDS) treatment train assessment tool.
    Jefferies C; Duffy A; Berwick N; McLean N; Hemingway A
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(5):1233-40. PubMed ID: 19717910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sustainable sewerage servicing options for peri-urban areas with failing septic systems.
    Sharma AK; Tjandraatmadja G; Grant AL; Grant T; Pamminger F
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(3):570-85. PubMed ID: 20706004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost-benefit analysis and the water framework directive in Scotland.
    Hanley N; Black AR
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2006 Apr; 2(2):156-65. PubMed ID: 16646384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The management of urban surface water flood risks: SUDS performance in flood reduction from extreme events.
    Viavattene C; Ellis JB
    Water Sci Technol; 2013; 67(1):99-108. PubMed ID: 23128626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Runoff infiltration, a desktop case study.
    Bastien NR; Arthur S; Wallis SG; Scholz M
    Water Sci Technol; 2011; 63(10):2300-8. PubMed ID: 21977653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Thinking broadly about costs and benefits in ecological management.
    Costanza R
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2006 Apr; 2(2):166-73. PubMed ID: 16646385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Medium-term performance and maintenance of SUDS: a case-study of Hopwood Park Motorway Service Area, UK.
    Heal KV; Bray R; Willingale SA; Briers M; Napier F; Jefferies C; Fogg P
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 59(12):2485-94. PubMed ID: 19542655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multicriteria decision approaches to support sustainable drainage options for the treatment of highway and urban runoff.
    Ellis JB; Deutsch JC; Mouchel JM; Scholes L; Revitt MD
    Sci Total Environ; 2004 Dec; 334-335():251-60. PubMed ID: 15504512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance-costs evaluation for urban storm drainage.
    Baptista M; Barraud S; Alfakih E; Nascimento N; Fernandes W; Moura P; Castro L
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(2):99-107. PubMed ID: 15790233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Integrated urban water management for residential areas: a reuse model.
    Barton AB; Argue JR
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(3):813-23. PubMed ID: 19657177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Uncertainty in urban flood damage assessment due to urban drainage modelling and depth-damage curve estimation.
    Freni G; La Loggia G; Notaro V
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(12):2979-93. PubMed ID: 20555194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rapid assessment system based on ecosystem services for retrofitting of sustainable drainage systems.
    Scholz M
    Environ Technol; 2014; 35(9-12):1286-95. PubMed ID: 24701926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of urban flooding by dual drainage simulation model RisUrSim.
    Schmitt TG; Thomas M; Ettrich N
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(5):257-64. PubMed ID: 16248203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A GIS-based methodology for selecting stormwater disconnection opportunities.
    Moore SL; Stovin VR; Wall M; Ashley RM
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 66(2):275-83. PubMed ID: 22699330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A geographic information system screening tool to tackle diffuse pollution through the use of sustainable drainage systems.
    Todorovic Z; Breton NP
    Water Sci Technol; 2014; 69(10):2066-73. PubMed ID: 24845322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An impact assessment methodology for urban surface runoff quality following best practice treatment.
    Ellis JB; Revitt DM; Lundy L
    Sci Total Environ; 2012 Feb; 416():172-9. PubMed ID: 22227301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Urban water tariff structure and cost recovery opportunities in India.
    Singh MR; Upadhyay V; Mittal AK
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(12):43-51. PubMed ID: 16477970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Costing and perspective in published cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Neumann PJ
    Med Care; 2009 Jul; 47(7 Suppl 1):S28-32. PubMed ID: 19536023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.