These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

570 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18496080)

  • 1. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis: studies of studies.
    Engberg S
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2008; 35(3):258-65. PubMed ID: 18496080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Summarizing systematic reviews: methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach.
    Aromataris E; Fernandez R; Godfrey CM; Holly C; Khalil H; Tungpunkom P
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):132-40. PubMed ID: 26360830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Research Pearls: The Significance of Statistics and Perils of Pooling. Part 3: Pearls and Pitfalls of Meta-analyses and Systematic Reviews.
    Harris JD; Brand JC; Cote MP; Dhawan A
    Arthroscopy; 2017 Aug; 33(8):1594-1602. PubMed ID: 28457677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Systematic reviews and metaanalyses. Basic knowledge, strengths and weaknesses of an important tool for healthcare professionals].
    Schnabel A; Kranke P
    Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 2010 Jul; 45(7-8):510-8. PubMed ID: 20665362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evidence-based practice: how to perform and use systematic reviews for clinical decision-making.
    Kranke P
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Sep; 27(9):763-72. PubMed ID: 20523217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fixed or random effects meta-analysis? Common methodological issues in systematic reviews of effectiveness.
    Tufanaru C; Munn Z; Stephenson M; Aromataris E
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):196-207. PubMed ID: 26355603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reporting of measures of accuracy in systematic reviews of diagnostic literature.
    Honest H; Khan KS
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2002; 2():4. PubMed ID: 11884248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adding up the evidence: systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Noordzij M; Zoccali C; Dekker FW; Jager KJ
    Nephron Clin Pract; 2011; 119(4):c310-6. PubMed ID: 22135790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The application of knowledge synthesis methods in agri-food public health: recent advancements, challenges and opportunities.
    Young I; Waddell L; Sanchez J; Wilhelm B; McEwen SA; Rajić A
    Prev Vet Med; 2014 Mar; 113(4):339-55. PubMed ID: 24485274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Systematic reviews: a primer for plastic surgery research.
    Margaliot Z; Chung KC
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2007 Dec; 120(7):1834-1841. PubMed ID: 18090745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Meta-analysis for orthodontists: Part II--Is all that glitters gold?
    Papageorgiou SN
    J Orthod; 2014 Dec; 41(4):327-36. PubMed ID: 25404669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The systematic review is the foundation of evidence based medicine. One of the most important contributions to clinical medicine of the past decade].
    Eliasson M
    Lakartidningen; 2000 May; 97(22):2726-8. PubMed ID: 10900892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Systematic reviews: a logical methodological extension of evidence-based medicine.
    Gallagher EJ
    Acad Emerg Med; 1999 Dec; 6(12):1255-60. PubMed ID: 10609928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Conducting systematic reviews of intervention questions III: Synthesizing data from intervention studies using meta-analysis.
    O'Connor AM; Sargeant JM; Wang C
    Zoonoses Public Health; 2014 Jun; 61 Suppl 1():52-63. PubMed ID: 24905996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews on tuberculosis.
    Nicolau I; Ling D; Tian L; Lienhardt C; Pai M
    Int J Tuberc Lung Dis; 2013 Sep; 17(9):1160-9. PubMed ID: 23809432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management, part I: introduction and general considerations.
    Manchikanti L
    Pain Physician; 2008; 11(2):161-86. PubMed ID: 18354710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evidence-based medicine: applications in dietetic practice.
    Gray GE; Gray LK
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2002 Sep; 102(9):1263-72; discussion 1272. PubMed ID: 12792624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Compliance of systematic reviews in ophthalmology with the PRISMA statement.
    Lee SY; Sagoo H; Farwana R; Whitehurst K; Fowler A; Agha R
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):178. PubMed ID: 29281981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews in the orthopaedic literature.
    Gagnier JJ; Kellam PJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Jun; 95(11):e771-7. PubMed ID: 23780547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 29.