332 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18496273)
1. Preload sensitivity of the Jarvik 2000 and HeartMate II left ventricular assist devices.
Khalil HA; Cohn WE; Metcalfe RW; Frazier OH
ASAIO J; 2008; 54(3):245-8. PubMed ID: 18496273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Current axial-flow devices--the HeartMate II and Jarvik 2000 left ventricular assist devices.
John R
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2008; 20(3):264-72. PubMed ID: 19038737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of pulsatile- and continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices on left ventricular unloading.
Garcia S; Kandar F; Boyle A; Colvin-Adams M; Lliao K; Joyce L; John R
J Heart Lung Transplant; 2008 Mar; 27(3):261-7. PubMed ID: 18342746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Optimization of axial-pump pressure sensitivity for a continuous-flow total artificial heart.
Frazier OH; Khalil HA; Benkowski RJ; Cohn WE
J Heart Lung Transplant; 2010 Jun; 29(6):687-91. PubMed ID: 20133164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Flow visualization techniques in a mock ventricle supported by a nonpulsatile left ventricular assist device.
Khalil HA; Metcalfe RW; Kleis SJ; Lee EL; Gilbert NL; Kerr DT; Frazier OH; Cohn WE
ASAIO J; 2009; 55(4):323-7. PubMed ID: 19512887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Response of rotary blood pumps to changes in preload and afterload at a fixed speed setting are unphysiological when compared with the natural heart.
Salamonsen RF; Mason DG; Ayre PJ
Artif Organs; 2011 Mar; 35(3):E47-53. PubMed ID: 21355872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hemodynamic controller for left ventricular assist device based on pulsatility ratio.
Choi S; Boston JR; Antaki JF
Artif Organs; 2007 Feb; 31(2):114-25. PubMed ID: 17298400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Performance of a new implantable cardiac assist centrifugal pump.
Tevaearai HT; Mueller XM; Jegger D; Augsburger M; Burki M; von Segesser LK
Artif Organs; 2001 Jan; 25(1):67-9. PubMed ID: 11167564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improved survival and decreasing incidence of adverse events with the HeartMate II left ventricular assist device as bridge-to-transplant therapy.
John R; Kamdar F; Liao K; Colvin-Adams M; Boyle A; Joyce L
Ann Thorac Surg; 2008 Oct; 86(4):1227-34; discussion 1234-5. PubMed ID: 18805167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Design and control of the atrio-aortic left ventricular assist device based on O2 consumption.
Drzewiecki GM; Pilla JJ; Welkowitz W
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1990 Feb; 37(2):128-37. PubMed ID: 2312137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An artificial right ventricle for failing fontan: in vitro and computational study.
Lacour-Gayet FG; Lanning CJ; Stoica S; Wang R; Rech BA; Goldberg S; Shandas R
Ann Thorac Surg; 2009 Jul; 88(1):170-6. PubMed ID: 19559219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Right heart dysfunction after left ventricular assist device implantation: a comparison of the pulsatile HeartMate I and axial-flow HeartMate II devices.
Patel ND; Weiss ES; Schaffer J; Ullrich SL; Rivard DC; Shah AS; Russell SD; Conte JV
Ann Thorac Surg; 2008 Sep; 86(3):832-40; discussion 832-40. PubMed ID: 18721570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of centrifugal, axial, and pulsatile left ventricular assist device support on end-organ function in heart failure patients.
Kamdar F; Boyle A; Liao K; Colvin-adams M; Joyce L; John R
J Heart Lung Transplant; 2009 Apr; 28(4):352-9. PubMed ID: 19332262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hemodynamic and exercise performance with pulsatile and continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices.
Haft J; Armstrong W; Dyke DB; Aaronson KD; Koelling TM; Farrar DJ; Pagani FD
Circulation; 2007 Sep; 116(11 Suppl):I8-15. PubMed ID: 17846330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In vitro and in vivo characterization of three different modes of pump operation when using a left ventricular assist device as a right ventricular assist device.
Stevens MC; Gregory SD; Nestler F; Thomson B; Choudhary J; Garlick B; Pauls JP; Fraser JF; Timms D
Artif Organs; 2014 Nov; 38(11):931-9. PubMed ID: 24660783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Acute hemodynamic study of Tai-Ta left ventricular assist device in a canine model.
Shyu JJ; Chou NK; Lee CJ; Chen CF; Shau YW; Wang SS; Chu SH
Artif Organs; 2004 Dec; 28(12):1095-101. PubMed ID: 15554938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Hemodynamic properties of the hemopump].
Mihaljevic T; Leskosek B; von Segesser LK; Tönz M; Turina M
Helv Chir Acta; 1994 Dec; 60(6):1159-62. PubMed ID: 7875998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pressures generated within the chambers of the MagScrew TAH: an in vitro study.
Flick CR; Weber S; Luangphakdy V; Klatte RS; Fukamachi K; Smith WA
ASAIO J; 2008; 54(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 18204317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Passive control of a biventricular assist device with compliant inflow cannulae.
Gregory SD; Pearcy MJ; Timms D
Artif Organs; 2012 Aug; 36(8):683-90. PubMed ID: 22882438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Nonthrombogenic, adhesive cellular lining for left ventricular assist devices.
Scott-Burden T; Tock CL; Bosely JP; Clubb FJ; Parnis SM; Schwarz JJ; Engler DA; Frazier OH; Casscells SW
Circulation; 1998 Nov; 98(19 Suppl):II339-45. PubMed ID: 9852924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]