263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18496352)
1. Letting the CAT out of the bag: comparing computer adaptive tests and an 11-item short form of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire.
Cook KF; Choi SW; Crane PK; Deyo RA; Johnson KL; Amtmann D
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 May; 33(12):1378-83. PubMed ID: 18496352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computerized adaptive testing in back pain: validation of the CAT-5D-QOL.
Kopec JA; Badii M; McKenna M; Lima VD; Sayre EC; Dvorak M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 May; 33(12):1384-90. PubMed ID: 18496353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Item response theory analysis to evaluate reliability and minimal clinically important change of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire in patients with severe disability due to back pain from vertebral compression fractures.
Lee MK; Yost KJ; McDonald JS; Dougherty RW; Vine RL; Kallmes DF
Spine J; 2017 Jun; 17(6):821-829. PubMed ID: 28087450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the functional rating index and the 18-item Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire: responsiveness and reliability.
Chansirinukor W; Maher CG; Latimer J; Hush J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Jan; 30(1):141-5. PubMed ID: 15626994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Differential item functioning impact in a modified version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire.
Crane PK; Cetin K; Cook KF; Johnson K; Deyo R; Amtmann D
Qual Life Res; 2007 Aug; 16(6):981-90. PubMed ID: 17443419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rasch analysis of the Roland disability questionnaire.
Garratt AM;
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jan; 28(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 12544962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An initial application of computerized adaptive testing (CAT) for measuring disability in patients with low back pain.
Elhan AH; Oztuna D; Kutlay S; Küçükdeveci AA; Tennant A
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2008 Dec; 9():166. PubMed ID: 19094219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Efficiency of static and computer adaptive short forms compared to full-length measures of depressive symptoms.
Choi SW; Reise SP; Pilkonis PA; Hays RD; Cella D
Qual Life Res; 2010 Feb; 19(1):125-36. PubMed ID: 19941077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. PROMIS Physical Function Short Forms Display Item- and Scale-Level Characteristics at Least as Good as the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain.
Chiarotto A; Roorda LD; Crins MH; Boers M; Ostelo RW; Terwee CB
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2020 Feb; 101(2):297-308. PubMed ID: 31689418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Measurement Precision and Efficiency of Computerized Adaptive Testing for the Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale in People With Stroke.
Seamon BA; Kautz SA; Velozo CA
Phys Ther; 2021 Apr; 101(4):. PubMed ID: 33481989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Difference in evaluation of patients with low back pain using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Score for Back Pain and the Japanese Version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire.
Nakamura M; Miyamoto K; Shimizu K
J Orthop Sci; 2009 Jul; 14(4):367-73. PubMed ID: 19662468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Measurement properties of the RM-18. A modified version of the Roland-Morris Disability Scale.
Stratford PW; Binkley JM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1997 Oct; 22(20):2416-21. PubMed ID: 9355224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rasch analysis of 24-, 18- and 11-item versions of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire.
Davidson M
Qual Life Res; 2009 May; 18(4):473-81. PubMed ID: 19238585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Item response theory analysis of the modified Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire in a population-based study.
Mielenz TJ; Carey TS; Edwards MC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Mar; 40(6):E366-71. PubMed ID: 25774468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Development of the computer-adaptive version of the Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument.
McDonough CM; Tian F; Ni P; Kopits IM; Moed R; Pardasaney PK; Jette AM
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci; 2012 Dec; 67(12):1427-38. PubMed ID: 22546960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cross-cultural adaptation of the Roland-Morris questionnaire for German-speaking patients with low back pain.
Wiesinger GF; Nuhr M; Quittan M; Ebenbichler G; Wölfl G; Fialka-Moser V
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Jun; 24(11):1099-103. PubMed ID: 10361659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of five low back disability questionnaires: reliability and responsiveness.
Davidson M; Keating JL
Phys Ther; 2002 Jan; 82(1):8-24. PubMed ID: 11784274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Argentinean version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire.
Scharovsky A; Pueyrredón M; Craig D; Rivas ME; Converso G; Pueyrredón JH; Salvat F; Alzúa O
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 May; 33(12):1391-5. PubMed ID: 18496354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Maine-Seattle back questionnaire: a 12-item disability questionnaire for evaluating patients with lumbar sciatica or stenosis: results of a derivation and validation cohort analysis.
Atlas SJ; Deyo RA; van den Ancker M; Singer DE; Keller RB; Patrick DL
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Aug; 28(16):1869-76. PubMed ID: 12923478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the short form 12-item survey (SF-12) in patients with back pain.
Luo X; George ML; Kakouras I; Edwards CL; Pietrobon R; Richardson W; Hey L
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Aug; 28(15):1739-45. PubMed ID: 12897502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
