131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18498452)
1. Vehicle effects on skin sensitizing potency of four chemicals: assessment using the local lymph node assay.
Wright ZM; Basketter PA; Blaikie L; Cooper KJ; Warbrick EV; Dearman RJ; Kimber I
Int J Cosmet Sci; 2001 Apr; 23(2):75-83. PubMed ID: 18498452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The impact of vehicle on the relative potency of skin-sensitizing chemicals in the local lymph node assay.
Jowsey IR; Clapp CJ; Safford B; Gibbons BT; Basketter DA
Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2008; 27(2):67-75. PubMed ID: 18568891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Estimation of relative skin sensitizing potency using the local lymph node assay: a comparison of formaldehyde with glutaraldehyde.
Hilton J; Dearman RJ; Harvey P; Evans P; Basketter DA; Kimber I
Am J Contact Dermat; 1998 Mar; 9(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 9471984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The impact of vehicle on assessment of relative skin sensitization potency of 1,4-dihydroquinone in the local lymph node assay.
Lea LJ; Warbrick EV; Dearman RJ; Kimber I; Basketter DA
Am J Contact Dermat; 1999 Dec; 10(4):213-8. PubMed ID: 10594297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Novel approach for classifying chemicals according to skin sensitizing potency by non-radioisotopic modification of the local lymph node assay.
Takeyoshi M; Iida K; Shiraishi K; Hoshuyama S
J Appl Toxicol; 2005; 25(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 15744759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The local lymph node assay and the assessment of relative potency: status of validation.
Basketter DA; Gerberick F; Kimber I
Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Aug; 57(2):70-5. PubMed ID: 17627643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The use of ethanol:diethylphthalate as a vehicle for the local lymph node assay.
Betts CJ; Beresford L; Dearman RJ; Lalko J; Api AP; Kimber I
Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Feb; 56(2):70-5. PubMed ID: 17244073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of application vehicle on skin sensitization to methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone: an analysis using the local lymph node assay.
Warbrick EV; Dearman RJ; Basketter DA; Kimber I
Contact Dermatitis; 1999 Dec; 41(6):325-9. PubMed ID: 10617213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predictive identification of human skin sensitization thresholds.
Basketter DA; Clapp C; Jefferies D; Safford B; Ryan CA; Gerberick F; Dearman RJ; Kimber I
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Nov; 53(5):260-7. PubMed ID: 16283904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantitative relationship between the local lymph node assay and human skin sensitization assays.
Schneider K; Akkan Z
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2004 Jun; 39(3):245-55. PubMed ID: 15135206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of the skin sensitization potency of eugenol and its dimers using a non-radioisotopic modification of the local lymph node assay.
Takeyoshi M; Noda S; Yamazaki S; Kakishima H; Yamasaki K; Kimber I
J Appl Toxicol; 2004; 24(1):77-81. PubMed ID: 14745850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Local lymph node assay (LLNA) for detection of sensitization capacity of chemicals.
Gerberick GF; Ryan CA; Dearman RJ; Kimber I
Methods; 2007 Jan; 41(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 16938465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Contact allergenic potency: correlation of human and local lymph node assay data.
Gerberick GF; Robinson MK; Ryan CA; Dearman RJ; Kimber I; Basketter DA; Wright Z; Marks JG
Am J Contact Dermat; 2001 Sep; 12(3):156-61. PubMed ID: 11526521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Skin sensitization testing in potency and risk assessment.
Kimber I; Basketter DA; Berthold K; Butler M; Garrigue JL; Lea L; Newsome C; Roggeband R; Steiling W; Stropp G; Waterman S; Wiemann C
Toxicol Sci; 2001 Feb; 59(2):198-208. PubMed ID: 11158712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Extrapolating local lymph node assay EC3 values to estimate relative sensitizing potency.
Ryan CA; Chaney JG; Gerberick GF; Kern PS; Dearman RJ; Kimber I; Basketter DA
Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2007; 26(2):135-45. PubMed ID: 17612980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Examination of a vehicle for use with water soluble materials in the murine local lymph node assay.
Ryan CA; Cruse LW; Skinner RA; Dearman RJ; Kimber I; Gerberick GF
Food Chem Toxicol; 2002 Nov; 40(11):1719-25. PubMed ID: 12176099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Use of the local lymph node assay for the estimation of relative contact allergenic potency.
Basketter DA; Balikie L; Dearman RJ; Kimber I; Ryan CA; Gerberick GF; Harvey P; Evans P; White IR; Rycroft RJ
Contact Dermatitis; 2000 Jun; 42(6):344-8. PubMed ID: 10871098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ethanol and diethyl phthalate: vehicle effects in the local lymph node assay.
Lalko J; Isola D; Api AM
Int J Toxicol; 2004; 23(3):171-7. PubMed ID: 15204720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Local lymph node assay responses to paraphenylenediamine: intra- and inter-laboratory evaluations.
Warbrick EV; Dearman RJ; Lea LJ; Basketter DA; Kimber I
J Appl Toxicol; 1999; 19(4):255-60. PubMed ID: 10439339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Further development of LLNA:DAE method as stand-alone skin-sensitization testing method and applied for evaluation of relative skin-sensitizing potency between chemicals.
Yamashita K; Shinoda S; Hagiwara S; Itagaki H
J Toxicol Sci; 2015 Apr; 40(2):137-50. PubMed ID: 25786520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
