These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18498497)
1. Sunscreen in vitro spectroscopy: application to UVA protection assessment and correlation with in vivo persistent pigment darkening. Ferrero L; Pissavini M; Marguerie S; Zastrow L Int J Cosmet Sci; 2002 Apr; 24(2):63-70. PubMed ID: 18498497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The COLIPA in vitro UVA method: a standard and reproducible measure of sunscreen UVA protection. Matts PJ; Alard V; Brown MW; Ferrero L; Gers-Barlag H; Issachar N; Moyal D; Wolber R Int J Cosmet Sci; 2010 Feb; 32(1):35-46. PubMed ID: 20412201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative evaluation of different substrates for the in vitro determination of sunscreen photostability: spectrophotometric and HPLC analyses. Scalia S; Mezzena M; Bianchi A Int J Cosmet Sci; 2010 Feb; 32(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 19732185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Photoprotective efficacy and photostability of fifteen sunscreen products having the same label SPF subjected to natural sunlight. Hojerová J; Medovcíková A; Mikula M Int J Pharm; 2011 Apr; 408(1-2):27-38. PubMed ID: 21277959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy for ultraviolet A protection factor measurement: correlation studies between in vitro and in vivo measurements. Ruvolo E; Chu M; Grossman F; Cole C; Kollias N Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed; 2009 Dec; 25(6):298-304. PubMed ID: 19906164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Immediate pigment darkening and persistent pigment darkening as means of measuring the ultraviolet A protection factor in vivo: a comparative study. Hwang YJ; Park HJ; Hahn HJ; Kim JY; Ko JH; Lee YW; Choe YB; Ahn KJ Br J Dermatol; 2011 Jun; 164(6):1356-61. PubMed ID: 21250967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of sun protection factors determined by an in vivo and different in vitro methodologies: a study with 58 different commercially available sunscreen products. Heinrich U; Tronnier H; Kockott D; Kuckuk R; Heise HM Int J Cosmet Sci; 2004 Apr; 26(2):79-89. PubMed ID: 18494916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vitro assessment of the broad-spectrum ultraviolet protection of sunscreen products. Diffey BL; Tanner PR; Matts PJ; Nash JF J Am Acad Dermatol; 2000 Dec; 43(6):1024-35. PubMed ID: 11100018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. How a calculated model of sunscreen film geometry can explain in vitro and in vivo SPF variation. Ferrero L; Pissavini M; Doucet O Photochem Photobiol Sci; 2010 Apr; 9(4):540-51. PubMed ID: 20354649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. SPF and UVA-PF sunscreen evaluation: are there good correlations among results obtained in vivo, in vitro and in a theoretical Sunscreen Simulator? A real-life exercise. Santos Caetano JP; Abarca AP; Guerato M; Guerra L; Schalka S; Perez Simão DC; Vila R Int J Cosmet Sci; 2016 Dec; 38(6):576-580. PubMed ID: 27012956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quartz plates for determining sun protection in vitro and testing photostability of commercial sunscreens. Akrman J; Kubác L; Bendová H; Jírová D; Kejlová K Int J Cosmet Sci; 2009 Apr; 31(2):119-29. PubMed ID: 19175432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sunscreen tests: correspondence between in vitro data and values reported by the manufacturers. Garoli D; Pelizzo MG; Bernardini B; Nicolosi P; Alaibac M J Dermatol Sci; 2008 Dec; 52(3):193-204. PubMed ID: 18755574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The sun protection factor (SPF) inadequately defines broad spectrum photoprotection: demonstration using skin reconstructed in vitro exposed to UVA, UVBor UV-solar simulated radiation. Bernerd F; Vioux C; Lejeune F; Asselineau D Eur J Dermatol; 2003; 13(3):242-9. PubMed ID: 12804982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Decreased human epidermal antigen-presenting cell activity after ultraviolet A exposure: dose-response effects and protection by sunscreens. Stoebner PE; Poosti R; Djoukelfit K; Martinez J; Meunier L Br J Dermatol; 2007 Jun; 156(6):1315-20. PubMed ID: 17535231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of the photoprotection properties of sunscreens by chromatographic measurement of DNA damage in skin explants. Mouret S; Bogdanowicz P; Haure MJ; Castex-Rizzi N; Cadet J; Favier A; Douki T Photochem Photobiol; 2011; 87(1):109-16. PubMed ID: 21091484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Broad-spectrum sunscreens provide better protection from solar ultraviolet-simulated radiation and natural sunlight-induced immunosuppression in human beings. Moyal DD; Fourtanier AM J Am Acad Dermatol; 2008 May; 58(5 Suppl 2):S149-54. PubMed ID: 18410801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. On the assessment of photostability of sunscreens exposed to UVA irradiation: from glass plates to pig/human skin, which is best? Crovara Pescia A; Astolfi P; Puglia C; Bonina F; Perrotta R; Herzog B; Damiani E Int J Pharm; 2012 May; 427(2):217-23. PubMed ID: 22343131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vivo persistent pigment darkening method: proposal of a new standard product for UVA protection factor determination. Moyal D; Pissavini M; Boyer F; Perier V; Frêlon JH Int J Cosmet Sci; 2007 Dec; 29(6):443-9. PubMed ID: 18489383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sun protection factors: world wide confusion. Osterwalder U; Herzog B Br J Dermatol; 2009 Nov; 161 Suppl 3():13-24. PubMed ID: 19775352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]