These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18498865)
1. A morbidity and mortality conference-based classification system for adverse events: surgical outcome analysis: part I. Antonacci AC; Lam S; Lavarias V; Homel P; Eavey RD J Surg Res; 2008 Jun; 147(2):172-7. PubMed ID: 18498865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A report card system using error profile analysis and concurrent morbidity and mortality review: surgical outcome analysis, part II. Antonacci AC; Lam S; Lavarias V; Homel P; Eavey RA J Surg Res; 2009 May; 153(1):95-104. PubMed ID: 18511079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Surgical adverse events, risk management, and malpractice outcome: morbidity and mortality review is not enough. Morris JA; Carrillo Y; Jenkins JM; Smith PW; Bledsoe S; Pichert J; White A Ann Surg; 2003 Jun; 237(6):844-51; discussion 851-2. PubMed ID: 12796581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Identification of surgical complications and deaths: an assessment of the traditional surgical morbidity and mortality conference compared with the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Hutter MM; Rowell KS; Devaney LA; Sokal SM; Warshaw AL; Abbott WM; Hodin RA J Am Coll Surg; 2006 Nov; 203(5):618-24. PubMed ID: 17084322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Development of an online morbidity, mortality, and near-miss reporting system to identify patterns of adverse events in surgical patients. Bilimoria KY; Kmiecik TE; DaRosa DA; Halverson A; Eskandari MK; Bell RH; Soper NJ; Wayne JD Arch Surg; 2009 Apr; 144(4):305-11; discussion 311. PubMed ID: 19380642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparing performance of Morbidity and Mortality Conference and National Surgical Quality Improvement Program for detection of complications after urologic surgery. Miller DC; Filson CP; Wallner LP; Montie JE; Campbell DA; Wei JT Urology; 2006 Nov; 68(5):931-7. PubMed ID: 17113882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Detection of adverse events in surgical patients using the Trigger Tool approach. Griffin FA; Classen DC Qual Saf Health Care; 2008 Aug; 17(4):253-8. PubMed ID: 18678721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Introduction--databases and the assessment of complications associated with the treatment of patients with congenital cardiac disease. Jacobs JP Cardiol Young; 2008 Dec; 18 Suppl 2():1-37. PubMed ID: 19063774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Measuring surgical quality: comparison of postoperative adverse events with the american college of surgeons NSQIP and the Thoracic Morbidity and Mortality classification system. Ivanovic J; Seely AJ; Anstee C; Villeneuve PJ; Gilbert S; Maziak DE; Shamji FM; Forster AJ; Sundaresan RS J Am Coll Surg; 2014 May; 218(5):1024-31. PubMed ID: 24661854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intraoperative adverse events and related postoperative complications in spine surgery: implications for enhancing patient safety founded on evidence-based protocols. Rampersaud YR; Moro ER; Neary MA; White K; Lewis SJ; Massicotte EM; Fehlings MG Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Jun; 31(13):1503-10. PubMed ID: 16741462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical consequences of feedback on ear surgery: the continuous recording of adverse events and complications with regard to reducing the number of surgeons who perform otosclerosis surgery. Rombout J; Van Zanten B; Fokkens WJ; Pauw BK Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2002 Aug; 259(7):351-61. PubMed ID: 12189400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale and atrial septal defect in adults: the impact of clinical variables and hospital procedure volume on in-hospital adverse events. Opotowsky AR; Landzberg MJ; Kimmel SE; Webb GD Am Heart J; 2009 May; 157(5):867-74. PubMed ID: 19376313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Residency education through the family medicine morbidity and mortality conference. Kim C; Fetters MD; Gorenflo DW Fam Med; 2006 Sep; 38(8):550-5. PubMed ID: 16944385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Linking processes and outcomes to improve surgical performance: a new approach to morbidity and mortality peer review. Pine M; Fry DE Am Surg; 2006 Nov; 72(11):1115-9; discussion 1126-48. PubMed ID: 17120958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Can systematic analysis of morbidity and mortality reduce complication rates in neurosurgery? Steiger HJ; Stummer W; Hänggi D Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2010 Dec; 152(12):2013-9. PubMed ID: 20936313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Learning in a new cardiac surgical center: an analysis of precursor events. Wong DR; Ali IS; Torchiana DF; Agnihotri AK; Bohmer RM; Vander Salm TJ Surgery; 2009 Feb; 145(2):131-7. PubMed ID: 19167967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The incidence and nature of adverse events during pediatric sedation/anesthesia with propofol for procedures outside the operating room: a report from the Pediatric Sedation Research Consortium. Cravero JP; Beach ML; Blike GT; Gallagher SM; Hertzog JH; Anesth Analg; 2009 Mar; 108(3):795-804. PubMed ID: 19224786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 cardiac surgery risk models: part 2--isolated valve surgery. O'Brien SM; Shahian DM; Filardo G; Ferraris VA; Haan CK; Rich JB; Normand SL; DeLong ER; Shewan CM; Dokholyan RS; Peterson ED; Edwards FH; Anderson RP; Ann Thorac Surg; 2009 Jul; 88(1 Suppl):S23-42. PubMed ID: 19559823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantitative analysis of adverse events in neurosurgery. Houkin K; Baba T; Minamida Y; Nonaka T; Koyanagi I; Iiboshi S Neurosurgery; 2009 Sep; 65(3):587-94; discussion 594. PubMed ID: 19687705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]