These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
1163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18498887)
1. Prevalence and management of instrument fracture in the postgraduate endodontic program at the Dental School of Athens: a five-year retrospective clinical study. Tzanetakis GN; Kontakiotis EG; Maurikou DV; Marzelou MP J Endod; 2008 Jun; 34(6):675-8. PubMed ID: 18498887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Nickel-titanium rotary instrument fracture: a clinical practice assessment. Di Fiore PM; Genov KA; Komaroff E; Li Y; Lin L Int Endod J; 2006 Sep; 39(9):700-8. PubMed ID: 16916359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Probability of removing fractured instruments from root canals. Suter B; Lussi A; Sequeira P Int Endod J; 2005 Feb; 38(2):112-23. PubMed ID: 15667633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of an ultrasonic technique to remove fractured rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments from root canals: an experimental study. Ward JR; Parashos P; Messer HH J Endod; 2003 Nov; 29(11):756-63. PubMed ID: 14651285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fracture of ProFile nickel-titanium rotary instruments: a laboratory simulation assessment. Di Fiore PM; Genov KI; Komaroff E; Dasanayake AP; Lin L Int Endod J; 2006 Jun; 39(6):502-9. PubMed ID: 16674746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Questionnaire survey on the use of rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments by Australian dentists. Parashos P; Messer HH Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):249-59. PubMed ID: 15056351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluating two techniques on removal of fractured rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments from root canals: an in vitro study. Alomairy KH J Endod; 2009 Apr; 35(4):559-62. PubMed ID: 19345805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Root canal shaping using rotary nickel-titanium files in preclinical teaching. Georgelin-Gurgel M; Devillard R; Lauret ME; Diemer F; Calas P; Hennequin M Odontostomatol Trop; 2008 Mar; 31(121):5-11. PubMed ID: 18623974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of an ultrasonic technique to remove fractured rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments from root canals: clinical cases. Ward JR; Parashos P; Messer HH J Endod; 2003 Nov; 29(11):764-7. PubMed ID: 14651286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Defects in nickel-titanium instruments after clinical use. Part 3: a 4-year retrospective study from an undergraduate clinic. Shen Y; Coil JM; Haapasalo M J Endod; 2009 Feb; 35(2):193-6. PubMed ID: 19166771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of rotational speed on the cyclic fatigue of rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. Lopes HP; Ferreira AA; Elias CN; Moreira EJ; de Oliveira JC; Siqueira JF J Endod; 2009 Jul; 35(7):1013-6. PubMed ID: 19567325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dissolution of nickel-titanium endodontic files via an electrochemical process: a new concept for future retrieval of fractured files in root canals. Ormiga F; da Cunha Ponciano Gomes JA; de Araújo MC J Endod; 2010 Apr; 36(4):717-20. PubMed ID: 20307750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A retrospective clinical study of incidence of root canal instrument separation in an endodontics graduate program: a PennEndo database study. Iqbal MK; Kohli MR; Kim JS J Endod; 2006 Nov; 32(11):1048-52. PubMed ID: 17055904 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Undergraduate teaching and clinical use of rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments: a survey of French dental schools. Arbab-Chirani R; Vulcain JM Int Endod J; 2004 May; 37(5):320-4. PubMed ID: 15086753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Canal preparation with Hero 642 rotary Ni-Ti instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-file assessed using computed tomography. Taşdemir T; Aydemir H; Inan U; Unal O Int Endod J; 2005 Jun; 38(6):402-8. PubMed ID: 15910476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Deformation and fracture of Mtwo rotary nickel-titanium instruments after clinical use. Inan U; Gonulol N J Endod; 2009 Oct; 35(10):1396-9. PubMed ID: 19801238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison between a hand stainless-steel K file and a rotary NiTi 0.04 taper. Namazikhah MS; Mokhlis HR; Alasmakh K J Calif Dent Assoc; 2000 Jun; 28(6):421-6. PubMed ID: 11324127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Shaping ability of two rotary instruments in simulated canals: stainless steel ENDOflash and nickel-titanium HERO Shaper. Perez F; Schoumacher M; Peli JF Int Endod J; 2005 Sep; 38(9):637-44. PubMed ID: 16104977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of root canal preparation using RaCe and ProTaper rotary Ni-Ti instruments. Paqué F; Musch U; Hülsmann M Int Endod J; 2005 Jan; 38(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 15606817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A novel technique for the removal of fractured instruments in the apical third of curved root canals. Rahimi M; Parashos P Int Endod J; 2009 Mar; 42(3):264-70. PubMed ID: 19228217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]