416 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18498904)
1. Comparison of forces generated during root canal shaping and residual stresses of three nickel-titanium rotary files by using a three-dimensional finite-element analysis.
Kim HC; Cheung GS; Lee CJ; Kim BM; Park JK; Kang SI
J Endod; 2008 Jun; 34(6):743-7. PubMed ID: 18498904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative analysis of torsional and bending stresses in two mathematical models of nickel-titanium rotary instruments: ProTaper versus ProFile.
Berutti E; Chiandussi G; Gaviglio I; Ibba A
J Endod; 2003 Jan; 29(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 12540212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Potential relationship between design of nickel-titanium rotary instruments and vertical root fracture.
Kim HC; Lee MH; Yum J; Versluis A; Lee CJ; Kim BM
J Endod; 2010 Jul; 36(7):1195-9. PubMed ID: 20630298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Stress distribution of three NiTi rotary files under bending and torsional conditions using a mathematic analysis.
Kim TO; Cheung GS; Lee JM; Kim BM; Hur B; Kim HC
Int Endod J; 2009 Jan; 42(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 19125976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mechanical response of nickel-titanium instruments with different cross-sectional designs during shaping of simulated curved canals.
Kim HC; Kim HJ; Lee CJ; Kim BM; Park JK; Versluis A
Int Endod J; 2009 Jul; 42(7):593-602. PubMed ID: 19467053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative study of torsional and bending properties for six models of nickel-titanium root canal instruments with different cross-sections.
Xu X; Eng M; Zheng Y; Eng D
J Endod; 2006 Apr; 32(4):372-5. PubMed ID: 16554216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Correlation between experimental cyclic fatigue resistance and numerical stress analysis for nickel-titanium rotary files.
Lee MH; Versluis A; Kim BM; Lee CJ; Hur B; Kim HC
J Endod; 2011 Aug; 37(8):1152-7. PubMed ID: 21763912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mechanical behavior of ProTaper universal F2 finishing file under various curvature conditions: a finite element analysis study.
Gao Y; Cheung GS; Shen Y; Zhou X
J Endod; 2011 Oct; 37(10):1446-50. PubMed ID: 21924200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of electropolishing on torque and force during simulated root canal preparation with ProTaper shaping files.
Boessler C; Paque F; Peters OA
J Endod; 2009 Jan; 35(1):102-6. PubMed ID: 19084135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A novel platform for in vitro analysis of torque, forces, and three-dimensional file displacements during root canal preparations: application to ProTaper rotary files.
Diop A; Maurel N; Oiknine M; Patoor E; Machtou P
J Endod; 2009 Apr; 35(4):568-72. PubMed ID: 19345807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparative computational analysis of the mechanical behavior of two nickel-titanium rotary endodontic instruments.
Necchi S; Petrini L; Taschieri S; Migliavacca F
J Endod; 2010 Aug; 36(8):1380-4. PubMed ID: 20647101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of the shaping abilities of 4 nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated root canals.
Yun HH; Kim SK
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Feb; 95(2):228-33. PubMed ID: 12582365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Analysis of mechanical preparations in extracted teeth using ProTaper rotary instruments: value of the safety quotient.
Blum JY; Machtou P; Ruddle C; Micallef JP
J Endod; 2003 Sep; 29(9):567-75. PubMed ID: 14503829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative analysis of torsional and bending behavior through finite-element models of 5 Ni-Ti endodontic instruments.
Arbab-Chirani R; Chevalier V; Arbab-Chirani S; Calloch S
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Jan; 111(1):115-21. PubMed ID: 21176826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of root canal preparation using RaCe and ProTaper rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
Paqué F; Musch U; Hülsmann M
Int Endod J; 2005 Jan; 38(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 15606817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals.
Schäfer E; Vlassis M
Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):229-38. PubMed ID: 15056349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of phase transformation on the torsional and bending properties of nickel-titanium rotary endodontic instruments.
Miyai K; Ebihara A; Hayashi Y; Doi H; Suda H; Yoneyama T
Int Endod J; 2006 Feb; 39(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 16454792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Defects in nickel-titanium instruments after clinical use. Part 2: Fractographic analysis of fractured surface in a cohort study.
Shen Y; Cheung GS; Peng B; Haapasalo M
J Endod; 2009 Jan; 35(1):133-6. PubMed ID: 19084143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of cross-sectional design and dimension on mechanical behavior of nickel-titanium instruments under torsion and bending: a numerical analysis.
Zhang EW; Cheung GS; Zheng YF
J Endod; 2010 Aug; 36(8):1394-8. PubMed ID: 20647104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Shaping ability and safety of five different rotary nickel-titanium instruments compared with stainless steel hand instrumentation in simulated curved root canals.
Schirrmeister JF; Strohl C; Altenburger MJ; Wrbas KT; Hellwig E
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Jun; 101(6):807-13. PubMed ID: 16731405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
