These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

30 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18499246)

  • 1. The Effects of Abutment Finish Lines on the Penetration Characteristics of Elastomers into the Simulated Gingival Sulcus.
    Jaroenpiboon A; Apinsathanon P; Na Nan P; Aimjirakul N
    Eur J Dent; 2023 Oct; 17(4):1129-1136. PubMed ID: 36599449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sulcus depth reproduction with polyvinyl siloxane impression material: effects of hydrophilicity and impression temperature.
    Takahashi H; Finger WJ; Kurokawa R; Furukawa M; Komatsu M
    Quintessence Int; 2010 Mar; 41(3):e43-50. PubMed ID: 20213014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Gingival sulcus simulation model for evaluating the penetration characteristics of elastomeric impression materials.
    Aimjirakul P; Masuda T; Takahashi H; Miura H
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(4):385-9. PubMed ID: 12956493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
    Caputi S; Varvara G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study.
    Lee H; Ercoli C; Funkenbusch PD; Feng C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 18262011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of newly formulated fast-setting elastomeric impression materials.
    Wadhwani CP; Johnson GH; Lepe X; Raigrodski AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jun; 93(6):530-9. PubMed ID: 15942613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sulcus reproduction with elastomeric impression materials: a new in vitro testing method.
    Finger WJ; Kurokawa R; Takahashi H; Komatsu M
    Dent Mater; 2008 Dec; 24(12):1655-60. PubMed ID: 18499246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predictable elastomeric impressions in advanced fixed prosthodontics: a comprehensive review.
    Lee EA
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2007 Oct; 19(9):529-36; quiz 537, 565. PubMed ID: 18038717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Trends in elastomeric impression materials.
    Craig RG; Sun Z
    Oper Dent; 1994; 19(4):138-45. PubMed ID: 9028233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Why should we use plaster for the prime impression in complete removable prosthodontics].
    Koffi NJ; Koffi KG; Assi KD
    Odontostomatol Trop; 2005 Sep; 28(111):17-22. PubMed ID: 16398307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy and stability of impression materials subjected to chemical disinfection - a literature review.
    Kotsiomiti E; Tzialla A; Hatjivasiliou K
    J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Apr; 35(4):291-9. PubMed ID: 18321265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tissue conditioning materials as functional impression materials.
    Chander S; Hill M; Moore D; Morrow L
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2007 Jun; 15(2):67-71. PubMed ID: 17645067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 2.