These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18499612)
1. Does patient position influence Doppler signal quality from the USCOM ultrasonic cardiac output monitor? Siu L; Tucker A; Manikappa SK; Monagle J Anesth Analg; 2008 Jun; 106(6):1798-802. PubMed ID: 18499612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of portable continuous wave Doppler ultrasound (ultrasonic cardiac output monitor) for cardiac output measurements in neonates. Meyer S; Todd D; Shadboldt B J Paediatr Child Health; 2009; 45(7-8):464-8. PubMed ID: 19712182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical validation of the non-invasive cardiac output monitor USCOM-1A in critically ill patients. van Lelyveld-Haas LE; van Zanten AR; Borm GF; Tjan DH Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2008 Nov; 25(11):917-24. PubMed ID: 18652712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cardiac index in term pregnant women in the sitting, lateral, and supine positions: an observational, crossover study. Armstrong S; Fernando R; Columb M; Jones T Anesth Analg; 2011 Aug; 113(2):318-22. PubMed ID: 21642602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Clinical study of neonatal cardiac output measurement methods]. Zheng ML; Sun X; Zhong J; He SR; Pan W; Pang CC; Sun YX; Liu YM Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Jan; 51(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 23527933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical evaluation of USCOM ultrasonic cardiac output monitor in cardiac surgical patients in intensive care unit. Tan HL; Pinder M; Parsons R; Roberts B; van Heerden PV Br J Anaesth; 2005 Mar; 94(3):287-91. PubMed ID: 15653709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ultrasonic cardiac output monitor provides accurate measurement of cardiac output in recipients after liver transplantation. Su BC; Lin CC; Su CW; Hui YL; Tsai YF; Yang MW; Lui PW Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan; 2008 Dec; 46(4):171-7. PubMed ID: 19097964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Nurse-determined assessment of cardiac output. Comparing a non-invasive cardiac output device and pulmonary artery catheter: a prospective observational study. Corley A; Barnett AG; Mullany D; Fraser JF Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Oct; 46(10):1291-7. PubMed ID: 19423107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the USCOM ultrasound cardiac output monitor with pulmonary artery catheter thermodilution in patients undergoing liver transplantation. Wong LS; Yong BH; Young KK; Lau LS; Cheng KL; Man JS; Irwin MG Liver Transpl; 2008 Jul; 14(7):1038-43. PubMed ID: 18581504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of continous-wave Doppler ultrasound monitor and echocardiography to assess cardiac output in intensive care patients. Elgendy A; Seppelt IM; Lane AS Crit Care Resusc; 2017 Sep; 19(3):222-229. PubMed ID: 28866972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of head up tilting on bioreactance cardiac output and stroke volume readings using suprasternal transcutaneous Doppler as a control in healthy young adults. Zhang J; Critchley LA; Lee DC; Khaw KS; Lee SW J Clin Monit Comput; 2016 Oct; 30(5):519-26. PubMed ID: 26873749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cardiac output estimation with a new Doppler device after off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. Chand R; Mehta Y; Trehan N J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2006 Jun; 20(3):315-9. PubMed ID: 16750729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of different positions on hemodynamics derived from noninvasive transcutaneous Doppler ultrasound. Chan CP; Cheung PL; Man Tse M; Agarwal N; Narain S; Chan SS; Smith BE; Graham CA; Rainer TH Physiol Rep; 2013 Sep; 1(4):e00062. PubMed ID: 24303147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Measurement of cardiac output with a non-invasive continuous wave Doppler device versus the pulmonary artery catheter: a comparative study. Chan JS; Segara D; Nair P Crit Care Resusc; 2006 Dec; 8(4):309-14. PubMed ID: 17227267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cardiac output assessment in pregnancy: comparison of two automated monitors with echocardiography. Vinayagam D; Patey O; Thilaganathan B; Khalil A Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 49(1):32-38. PubMed ID: 26970353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The influence of left lateral position on cardiac output changes after head up tilt measured by impedance cardiography. Kamenik M J Clin Monit Comput; 1999 Dec; 15(7-8):519-23. PubMed ID: 12578050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation of an ultrasound dilution technology for cardiac output measurement and shunt detection in infants and children. Lindberg L; Johansson S; Perez-de-Sa V Pediatr Crit Care Med; 2014 Feb; 15(2):139-47. PubMed ID: 24366506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reliability of a new ultrasonic cardiac output monitor in recipients of living donor liver transplantation. Su BC; Yu HP; Yang MW; Lin CC; Kao MC; Chang CH; Lee WC Liver Transpl; 2008 Jul; 14(7):1029-37. PubMed ID: 18581505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Testing the reliability of a new ultrasonic cardiac output monitor, the USCOM, by using aortic flowprobes in anesthetized dogs. Critchley LA; Peng ZY; Fok BS; Lee A; Phillips RA Anesth Analg; 2005 Mar; 100(3):748-753. PubMed ID: 15728064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Study to determine the repeatability of supra-sternal Doppler (ultrasound cardiac output monitor) during general anaesthesia: effects of scan quality, flow volume, and increasing age. Huang L; Critchley LA Br J Anaesth; 2013 Dec; 111(6):907-15. PubMed ID: 23880100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]