520 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18500502)
1. Adenoma detection rate: the real indicator of quality in colonoscopy.
Millan MS; Gross P; Manilich E; Church JM
Dis Colon Rectum; 2008 Aug; 51(8):1217-20. PubMed ID: 18500502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy.
Barclay RL; Vicari JJ; Doughty AS; Johanson JF; Greenlaw RL
N Engl J Med; 2006 Dec; 355(24):2533-41. PubMed ID: 17167136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Adenomas are detected more often in morning than in afternoon colonoscopy.
Sanaka MR; Deepinder F; Thota PN; Lopez R; Burke CA
Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Jul; 104(7):1659-64; quiz 1665. PubMed ID: 19491841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Longer mean colonoscopy withdrawal time is associated with increased adenoma detection: evidence from the Bowel Cancer Screening Programme in England.
Lee TJ; Blanks RG; Rees CJ; Wright KC; Nickerson C; Moss SM; Chilton A; Goddard AF; Patnick J; McNally RJ; Rutter MD
Endoscopy; 2013; 45(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 23254403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact of video recording colonoscopy on adenoma detection rates.
Madhoun MF; Tierney WM
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Jan; 75(1):127-33. PubMed ID: 21963062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Factors determining the quality of screening colonoscopy: a prospective study on adenoma detection rates, from 12,134 examinations (Berlin colonoscopy project 3, BECOP-3).
Adler A; Wegscheider K; Lieberman D; Aminalai A; Aschenbeck J; Drossel R; Mayr M; Mroß M; Scheel M; Schröder A; Gerber K; Stange G; Roll S; Gauger U; Wiedenmann B; Altenhofen L; Rosch T
Gut; 2013 Feb; 62(2):236-41. PubMed ID: 22442161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of endoscopist withdrawal speed on polyp yield: implications for optimal colonoscopy withdrawal time.
Simmons DT; Harewood GC; Baron TH; Petersen BT; Wang KK; Boyd-Enders F; Ott BJ
Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2006 Sep; 24(6):965-71. PubMed ID: 16948808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quality of colonoscopy withdrawal technique and variability in adenoma detection rates (with videos).
Lee RH; Tang RS; Muthusamy VR; Ho SB; Shah NK; Wetzel L; Bain AS; Mackintosh EE; Paek AM; Crissien AM; Saraf LJ; Kalmaz DM; Savides TJ
Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Jul; 74(1):128-34. PubMed ID: 21531410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Adenoma detection rate and the quality of colonoscopy: the sword has two edges.
Church J
Dis Colon Rectum; 2008 May; 51(5):520-3. PubMed ID: 18322755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Serrated polyp detection rate during screening colonoscopy.
Liang J; Kalady MF; Appau K; Church J
Colorectal Dis; 2012 Nov; 14(11):1323-7. PubMed ID: 22390284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Advanced adenoma detection rate is independent of nonadvanced adenoma detection rate.
Greenspan M; Rajan KB; Baig A; Beck T; Mobarhan S; Melson J
Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Aug; 108(8):1286-92. PubMed ID: 23711625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Improved colorectal adenoma detection with a transparent retractable extension device.
Horiuchi A; Nakayama Y
Am J Gastroenterol; 2008 Feb; 103(2):341-5. PubMed ID: 18076740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Flat adenomas of the large bowel: a single endoscopist study.
Gorgun E; Church J
Dis Colon Rectum; 2009 May; 52(5):972-7. PubMed ID: 19502865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Modifiable endoscopic factors that influence the adenoma detection rate in colorectal cancer screening colonoscopies.
Jover R; Zapater P; Polanía E; Bujanda L; Lanas A; Hermo JA; Cubiella J; Ono A; González-Méndez Y; Peris A; Pellisé M; Seoane A; Herreros-de-Tejada A; Ponce M; Marín-Gabriel JC; Chaparro M; Cacho G; Fernández-Díez S; Arenas J; Sopeña F; de-Castro L; Vega-Villaamil P; Rodríguez-Soler M; Carballo F; Salas D; Morillas JD; Andreu M; Quintero E; Castells A;
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Mar; 77(3):381-389.e1. PubMed ID: 23218945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparative study of standard vs. high definition colonoscopy for adenoma and hyperplastic polyp detection with optimized withdrawal technique.
East JE; Stavrindis M; Thomas-Gibson S; Guenther T; Tekkis PP; Saunders BP
Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2008 Sep; 28(6):768-76. PubMed ID: 18715401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Polypectomy rate as a quality measure for colonoscopy.
Williams JE; Le TD; Faigel DO
Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Mar; 73(3):498-506. PubMed ID: 20970795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of a time-dependent colonoscopic withdrawal protocol on adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy.
Barclay RL; Vicari JJ; Greenlaw RL
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2008 Oct; 6(10):1091-8. PubMed ID: 18639495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The importance of colonoscopy in colorectal surgeons' practices: results of a survey.
Kann BR; Margolin DA; Brill SA; Hicks TC; Timmcke AE; Whitlow CB; Beck DE
Dis Colon Rectum; 2006 Nov; 49(11):1763-7. PubMed ID: 16990980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The influence of timing of colonoscopy on adenoma detection: is timing everything?
Vicari J
Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Jul; 104(7):1666-7. PubMed ID: 19574972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A prospective randomised study on narrow-band imaging versus conventional colonoscopy for adenoma detection: does narrow-band imaging induce a learning effect?
Adler A; Pohl H; Papanikolaou IS; Abou-Rebyeh H; Schachschal G; Veltzke-Schlieker W; Khalifa AC; Setka E; Koch M; Wiedenmann B; Rösch T
Gut; 2008 Jan; 57(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 17681999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
