BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18500990)

  • 1. GeneCount: genome-wide calculation of absolute tumor DNA copy numbers from array comparative genomic hybridization data.
    Lyng H; Lando M; Brøvig RS; Svendsrud DH; Johansen M; Galteland E; Brustugun OT; Meza-Zepeda LA; Myklebost O; Kristensen GB; Hovig E; Stokke T
    Genome Biol; 2008; 9(5):R86. PubMed ID: 18500990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Combined array-comparative genomic hybridization and single-nucleotide polymorphism-loss of heterozygosity analysis reveals complex genetic alterations in cervical cancer.
    Kloth JN; Oosting J; van Wezel T; Szuhai K; Knijnenburg J; Gorter A; Kenter GG; Fleuren GJ; Jordanova ES
    BMC Genomics; 2007 Feb; 8():53. PubMed ID: 17311676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. DNA copy number abnormality of oral squamous cell carcinoma detected with cDNA array-based comparative genomic hybridization.
    Zhou X; Jordan RC; Mok S; Birrer MJ; Wong DT
    Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2004 May; 151(1):90-2. PubMed ID: 15120918
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Challenges in array comparative genomic hybridization for the analysis of cancer samples.
    Nowak NJ; Miecznikowski J; Moore SR; Gaile D; Bobadilla D; Smith DD; Kernstine K; Forman SJ; Mhawech-Fauceglia P; Reid M; Stoler D; Loree T; Rigual N; Sullivan M; Weiss LM; Hicks D; Slovak ML
    Genet Med; 2007 Sep; 9(9):585-95. PubMed ID: 17873646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Correlation of DNA copy number changes to malignancy in oral squamous cell carcinomas by comparative genomic hybridization].
    Miyahara Y
    Kokubyo Gakkai Zasshi; 2000 Jun; 67(2):193-200. PubMed ID: 10921243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hidden gene amplifications in aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas detected by microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization.
    Wessendorf S; Schwaenen C; Kohlhammer H; Kienle D; Wrobel G; Barth TF; Nessling M; Möller P; Döhner H; Lichter P; Bentz M
    Oncogene; 2003 Mar; 22(9):1425-9. PubMed ID: 12618769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays.
    Pinkel D; Segraves R; Sudar D; Clark S; Poole I; Kowbel D; Collins C; Kuo WL; Chen C; Zhai Y; Dairkee SH; Ljung BM; Gray JW; Albertson DG
    Nat Genet; 1998 Oct; 20(2):207-11. PubMed ID: 9771718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The application of comparative genomic hybridization to previously karyotyped cervical cancer cell lines.
    Thein A; Trková M; Fox M; Parrington J
    Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2000 Jan; 116(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 10616535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Detection of DNA copy number alterations in cancer by array comparative genomic hybridization.
    Michels E; De Preter K; Van Roy N; Speleman F
    Genet Med; 2007 Sep; 9(9):574-84. PubMed ID: 17873645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Array comparative genomic hybridization analysis of uterine leiomyosarcoma.
    Cho YL; Bae S; Koo MS; Kim KM; Chun HJ; Kim CK; Ro DY; Kim JH; Lee CH; Kim YW; Ahn WS
    Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Dec; 99(3):545-51. PubMed ID: 16125217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Amplification at 9p in cervical carcinoma by comparative genomic hybridization.
    Jee KJ; Kim YT; Kim KR; Aalto Y; Knuutila S
    Anal Cell Pathol; 2001; 22(3):159-63. PubMed ID: 11455035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intratumoral regional variations in copy number of the chromosomal part revealed by microdissection and combined ploidy and comparative genomic hybridization analyses in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
    Kamitani S; Sugihara H; Shiomi H; Tani T; Hattori T
    Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2002 Jan; 132(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 11801305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Array-based comparative genomic hybridization for the detection of DNA sequence copy number changes in Barrett's adenocarcinoma.
    Albrecht B; Hausmann M; Zitzelsberger H; Stein H; Siewert JR; Hopt U; Langer R; Höfler H; Werner M; Walch A
    J Pathol; 2004 Jul; 203(3):780-8. PubMed ID: 15221937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genome-wide analysis of DNA copy-number changes using cDNA microarrays.
    Pollack JR; Perou CM; Alizadeh AA; Eisen MB; Pergamenschikov A; Williams CF; Jeffrey SS; Botstein D; Brown PO
    Nat Genet; 1999 Sep; 23(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 10471496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prognostic value of genomic alterations in invasive cervical squamous cell carcinoma of clinical stage IB detected by comparative genomic hybridization.
    Dellas A; Torhorst J; Jiang F; Proffitt J; Schultheiss E; Holzgreve W; Sauter G; Mihatsch MJ; Moch H
    Cancer Res; 1999 Jul; 59(14):3475-9. PubMed ID: 10416613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Semi-quantitative fluorescent PCR analysis identifies PRKAA1 on chromosome 5 as a potential candidate cancer gene of cervical cancer.
    Huang FY; Chiu PM; Tam KF; Kwok YK; Lau ET; Tang MH; Ng TY; Liu VW; Cheung AN; Ngan HY
    Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Oct; 103(1):219-25. PubMed ID: 16595147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. DNA gains in 3q occur frequently in squamous cell carcinoma of the lung, but not in adenocarcinoma.
    Björkqvist AM; Husgafvel-Pursiainen K; Anttila S; Karjalainen A; Tammilehto L; Mattson K; Vainio H; Knuutila S
    Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 1998 May; 22(1):79-82. PubMed ID: 9591638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Array CGH identifies distinct DNA copy number profiles of oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes in chromosomal- and microsatellite-unstable sporadic colorectal carcinomas.
    Lassmann S; Weis R; Makowiec F; Roth J; Danciu M; Hopt U; Werner M
    J Mol Med (Berl); 2007 Mar; 85(3):293-304. PubMed ID: 17143621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of degenerate oligonucleotide-primed polymerase chain reaction amplification and labeling methods on the sensitivity and specificity of metaphase- and array-based comparative genomic hybridization.
    Tsubosa Y; Sugihara H; Mukaisho K; Kamitani S; Peng DF; Ling ZQ; Tani T; Hattori T
    Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2005 Apr; 158(2):156-66. PubMed ID: 15796963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Across array comparative genomic hybridization: a strategy to reduce reference channel hybridizations.
    Buffart TE; Israeli D; Tijssen M; Vosse SJ; Mrsić A; Meijer GA; Ylstra B
    Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2008 Nov; 47(11):994-1004. PubMed ID: 18663753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.