These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
405 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18501267)
1. Assessment of true intraocular pressure: the gap between theory and practical data. Chihara E Surv Ophthalmol; 2008; 53(3):203-18. PubMed ID: 18501267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Measuring intraocular pressure-adjustments for corneal thickness and new technologies. Herndon LW Curr Opin Ophthalmol; 2006 Apr; 17(2):115-9. PubMed ID: 16552245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis on tonometry as measured by dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Goldmann tonometry in glaucomatous eyes. Hager A; Loge K; Schroeder B; Füllhas MO; Wiegand W J Glaucoma; 2008 Aug; 17(5):361-5. PubMed ID: 18703945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Agreement of rebound tonometer in measuring intraocular pressure with three types of applanation tonometers. Nakamura M; Darhad U; Tatsumi Y; Fujioka M; Kusuhara A; Maeda H; Negi A Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Aug; 142(2):332-4. PubMed ID: 16876523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The influence of central corneal thickness and corneal curvature radius on the intraocular pressure as measured by different tonometers: noncontact and goldmann applanation tonometers. Harada Y; Hirose N; Kubota T; Tawara A J Glaucoma; 2008 Dec; 17(8):619-25. PubMed ID: 19092456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of corneal structure, corneal responsiveness, and other ocular parameters on tonometric measurement of intraocular pressure. Broman AT; Congdon NG; Bandeen-Roche K; Quigley HA J Glaucoma; 2007; 16(7):581-8. PubMed ID: 18091174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [What to do if the intraocular pressure measurement does not appear reliable]. Hamard P J Fr Ophtalmol; 2010 Apr; 33(4):279-84. PubMed ID: 20347507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The accuracy of continued clinical use of goldmann applanation tonometers with known calibration errors. Sandhu SS; Chattopadhyay S; Amariotakis GA; Skarmoutsos F; Birch MK; Ray-Chaudhuri N Ophthalmology; 2009 Jan; 116(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 18801579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the pressure phosphene tonometer as a self-tonometer. Naruse S; Mori K; Kinoshita S Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 Sep; 25(5):421-8. PubMed ID: 16101948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three portable tonometers, the TGDc-01, the ICARE and the Tonopen XL, compared with each other and with Goldmann applanation tonometry*. van der Jagt LH; Jansonius NM Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 Sep; 25(5):429-35. PubMed ID: 16101949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Proview phosphene tonometer fails to measure ocular pressure accurately in clinical practice. Alvarez TL; Gollance SA; Thomas GA; Greene RJ; Marchetto PM; Moore EJ; Realini T; Liebmann JM; Ritch R; Lama P; Fechtner RD Ophthalmology; 2004 Jun; 111(6):1077-85. PubMed ID: 15177956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Clinical evaluation of the ICare tonometer in measuring intraocular pressure]. Krzyzanowska-Berkowska P; Asejczyk-Widlicka M Klin Oczna; 2010; 112(7-9):217-20. PubMed ID: 21121124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of corneal parameters in keratoconus on IOP readings obtained with different tonometers. Firat PG; Orman G; Doganay S; Demirel S Clin Exp Optom; 2013 Mar; 96(2):233-7. PubMed ID: 23320621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Corneal hysteresis and intraocular pressure measurement in children using the reichert ocular response analyzer. Kirwan C; O'Keefe M; Lanigan B Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Dec; 142(6):990-2. PubMed ID: 17157583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Incorporating corneal pachymetry into the management of glaucoma. Iester M; Mete M; Figus M; Frezzotti P J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Sep; 35(9):1623-8. PubMed ID: 19683164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]